Hi All,
Don't know if this is worth reporting, as it's human error. Anyway, I had a
panic on my zfs box. Here's the error:
marksburg /usr2/glowe> grep panic /var/log/syslog
Apr 8 06:57:17 marksburg savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic:
assertion failed: 0 == dmu_buf_hold_arra
> > Yes, I made note of that in my OP on this thread. But is it enough to
> > end up with 8gb of non-compressed files measuring 8gb on
> > reiserfs(linux) and the same data showing nearly 9gb when copied to a
> > zfs filesystem with compression on.
>
> whoops.. a hefty exaggeration it only show
Harry Putnam writes:
> Richard Elling writes:
>
>> Harry Putnam wrote:
>>> Robert Milkowski writes:
>>>
>>>
Then is block doesn't compress better than 12.5% it won't be
compressed at all. Then in zfs you need extra space for checksums, etc.
How did the OP came up with how
Richard Elling writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Robert Milkowski writes:
>>
>>
>>> Then is block doesn't compress better than 12.5% it won't be
>>> compressed at all. Then in zfs you need extra space for checksums, etc.
>>>
>>> How did the OP came up with how much data is being used?
>>>
Harry Putnam wrote:
Robert Milkowski writes:
Then is block doesn't compress better than 12.5% it won't be
compressed at all. Then in zfs you need extra space for checksums, etc.
How did the OP came up with how much data is being used?
OP, just used `du -sh' at both ends of the trans
Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "ms" == Michael Shadle writes:
>
> ms> When I attach this new raidz2, will ZFS auto "rebalance" data
> ms> between the two, or will it keep the other one empty and do
> ms> some sort of load balancing between the two for future wri
> "gs" == Geoff Shipman writes:
gs> At this point boot from disk into single user mode and move
gs> the /etc/zfs/zpool.cache file to a different name.
and these days ``boot single-user'' seems to often mean
'boot -m milestone=none'. The old 'boot -s' will, AFAICT, still read
zpool.
> "ms" == Michael Shadle writes:
ms> When I attach this new raidz2, will ZFS auto "rebalance" data
ms> between the two, or will it keep the other one empty and do
ms> some sort of load balancing between the two for future writes
ms> only?
the second choice.
You can see how t
Michael,
You can't attach disks to an existing RAIDZ vdev, but you add another
RAIDZ vdev. Also keep in mind that you can't detach disks from RAIDZ
pools either.
See the syntax below.
Cindy
# zpool create rzpool raidz2 c1t0d0 c1t1d0 c1t2d0
# zpool status
pool: rzpool
state: ONLINE
scrub:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Tomas Ögren wrote:
>> Do you think there is something that can be done to recover lost data?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vic
>
> Does 'zpool import' find anything? devfsadm -v to re-scan devices
> first perhaps..
... or info from the other thread
"boot from disk into sing
On 07 April, 2009 - Victor Galis sent me these 5,8K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> I have lost a ZFS volume and I am hoping to get some help to recover the
> information ( a couple of months worth of work :( ).
>
> I have been using ZFS for more than 6 months on this project. Yesterday
> I ran a "zvol statu
11 matches
Mail list logo
