Not wanting to hijack this thread, but...
I'm a simple man with simple needs. I'd like to be able to manually spin
down my disks whenever I want to...
Anyone come up with a way to do this? ;)
Nathan.
Jens Elkner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 02:54:10PM -0800, Yuan Chu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
Krzys wrote:
> compression is not supported for rootpool?
>
> # zpool create rootpool c1t1d0s0
> # zfs set compression=gzip-9 rootpool
>
I think gzip compression is not supported on zfs root. Try compression=on.
Regards,
Fajar
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
compression is not supported for rootpool?
# zpool create rootpool c1t1d0s0
# zfs set compression=gzip-9 rootpool
# lucreate -c ufsBE -n zfsBE -p rootpool
Analyzing system configuration.
ERROR: ZFS pool does not support boot environments
#
why? are there any plans to have compression on that dis
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> After that, I decided to upgrade my zpool (b98 has zpool v13). Surprise,
> surpise, the system now doesn't boot at all. Apparently I got hit by
> this "bug" :
> http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/ZFS_rpool_Upgrade_and_GRUB
>
>
b98 CD works as expected. I made a litt
On 05/11/2008, at 2:22 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>
>>> be done in a very short time. perhaps you can amortize that cost by
>>> doing it when the data from userland makes it into the kernel.
>>> another
>>> idea could be doing
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
>> be done in a very short time. perhaps you can amortize that cost by
>> doing it when the data from userland makes it into the kernel. another
>> idea could be doing the compression when you reach a relatively low
>> threshol
Has anyone done a script to check for filesystem problems?
On our existing UFS infrastructure we have a cron job run metacheck.pl
periodically so we get email if an SVM setup has problems.
We can scratch something like this together but if someone else already has.
--
This message posted fr
I did upgrade my Solaris and wanted to move from ufs to zfs, I did read about
it
a little but I am not sure about all the steps...
Anyway I do understand that I cannot use whole disk as zpool, so I cannot use
c1t1d0 but I do have to use c1t1d0s0 instead is that correct?
also all documents tha
Hi,
I'm observing a change in the values returned by zpool_get_prop_int. In Solaris
10 update 5 this function returned the values for ZPOOL_PROP_CAPACITY in bytes,
but in update 6 (i.e. nv88?) it seems to be returning the value in kB.
Both Solaris versions were shipped with libzfs.so.2. So how
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:52:33AM -0800, Ivan Wang wrote:
> > $ /usr/bin/amd64/ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 user opc0 oct. 16 2057
> > .gtk-bookmarks
> >
> > This is a bit absurd. I thought Solaris was fully 64
> > bit. I hope those tools will be integrated soon.
Solaris
Would you send the messages that appeared with
the failed ludelete?
Lori
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris
From: Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FYI: s10u6 LU issues
quoting cindy (Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:01:07 -0800 (PST)):
Besides the release notes, I'm c
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:31:16PM -0700, Carl Wimmi wrote:
>>
>> There isn't a de-populated version.
>>
>> Would X4540 with 250 or 500 GB drives meet your needs?
Other than the number of drives offered, it seems that the X4540 is a
substantially different
Well, what's the end goal? What are you testing for that you need from the
thumper?
I/O interfaces? CPU? Chipset? If you need *everything* you don't have any
other choice.
--Tim
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:31:16PM -0700,
All,
my apologies in advance for the wide distribution - it
was recommended that I contact these aliases but if
there is a more appropriate one, please let me know...
I have received the following EFI disk-related
questions from the EMC PowerPath team who
would like to provide more complete
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:31:16PM -0700, Carl Wimmi wrote:
>
> There isn't a de-populated version.
>
> Would X4540 with 250 or 500 GB drives meet your needs?
That might be our only choice.
--
-Gary Mills--Unix Support--U of M Academic Computing and Networking-
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris
From: Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FYI: s10u6 LU issues
quoting cindy (Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:01:07 -0800 (PST)):
> Besides the release notes, I'm collecting many issues here as well:
>
> http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Troubleshooti
Hi Gary:
There isn't a de-populated version.
Would X4540 with 250 or 500 GB drives meet your needs?
- Carl
Gary Mills wrote:
> One of our storage guys would like to put a thumper into service, but
> he's looking for a smaller model to use for testing. Is there something
> that has the same
One of our storage guys would like to put a thumper into service, but
he's looking for a smaller model to use for testing. Is there something
that has the same CPU, disks, and disk controller as a thumper, but
fewer disks? The ones I've seen all have 48 disks.
--
-Gary Mills--Unix Support-
On 05/11/2008, at 3:27 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> be done in a very short time. perhaps you can amortize that cost by
>> doing it when the data from userland makes it into the kernel.
>> another
>> idea could be doing the compression when you reach
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
> I also need this information.
> Thanks a lot for keeping me on the loop also
I didn't hear anything back on this, so I went ahead and opened an SR on my
contract, it's #66126640. With an @sun.com address I think you'd have
better information sources tha
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I've been struggling to fully understand why disk space seems to vanish.
> I've dug through bits of code and reviewed all the mails on the subject that
> I can find, but I still don't have a proper understanding of whats going on.
>
> I did a test with a local zpool on s
Hernan Freschi wrote:
> Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I'm having a little
> trouble deleting old solaris installs:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# lustatus
> Boot Environment Is Active ActiveCanCopy
> Name Complete NowOn Reboot Dele
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 6:12:48 PM, you wrote:
RE> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello zfs-discuss,
>>
>> Looks like it is not supported there - what are the current plan to
>> bring L2ARC to Solaris 10?
>>
RE> L2ARC did not make Solaris 10 10/08 (aka update 6). I think th
Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello zfs-discuss,
>
> Looks like it is not supported there - what are the current plan to
> bring L2ARC to Solaris 10?
>
L2ARC did not make Solaris 10 10/08 (aka update 6). I think the plans for
update 7 are still being formed.
-- richard
__
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Hernan Freschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I'm having a little
> trouble deleting old solaris installs:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# lustatus
> Boot Environment Is Active ActiveCanCopy
> Name
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, David Gwynne wrote:
> be done in a very short time. perhaps you can amortize that cost by
> doing it when the data from userland makes it into the kernel. another
> idea could be doing the compression when you reach a relatively low
> threshold of uncompressed data in the cache
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I'm having a little trouble
deleting old solaris installs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# lustatus
Boot Environment Is Active ActiveCanCopy
Name Complete NowOn Reboot Delete Status
---
Hello zfs-discuss,
Looks like it is not supported there - what are the current plan to
bring L2ARC to Solaris 10?
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
_
Sean Alderman wrote:
> Greetings,
> I have been evaluating an X4540 server. I now have to return it. I'm
> curious about all of your thoughts on the best method for securely wiping the
> data might be.
Use the purge command from the analyze submenu of format(1M) on each disk.
--
Darren J M
Greetings,
I have been evaluating an X4540 server. I now have to return it. I'm
curious about all of your thoughts on the best method for securely wiping the
data might be.
Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailin
Hello Marc. Thank you so much for your help with this. Although the process
took a full two days (I've got the Supermicro AOC 8 port PCI-X card in a PCI
slot, dog-slow write speeds) it went off without a hitch thanks to your
excellent guide.
# zpool list mp
NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP H
On 11/05/2007, at 4:54 AM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:10 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> Btw: In one experiment I tried to boot the kernel under kmdb
>> control (-kd), patched "minclsyspri := 61" and used a
>> breakpoint inside spa_active() to patch the spa_zio_* taskq
>> to u
Mark Shellenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> You can, but I don't think ufsdump is ACL aware.
> >> ufsdump is ACL aware since 12 years.
> >>
> >> The problem may be in ufsrestore that IIRC only supports POSIX draft
> >> ACLs.
> >>
> >> If ZFS is able to translate this to NFSv4 ACLs, you may h
> I see, thanks.
> And as Jörg said, I only need a 64 bit binary. I
> didn't know, but there is one for ls, and it does
> work as expected:
>
> $ /usr/bin/amd64/ls -l .gtk-bookmarks
> -rw-r--r-- 1 user opc0 oct. 16 2057
> .gtk-bookmarks
>
> This is a bit absurd. I thought Solaris
George,
> I'm looking for any pointers or advice on what might have happened
> to cause the following problem...
To run Oracle RAC on iSCSI Target LUs, accessible by three or more
iSCSI Initiator nodes, requires support for SCSI-3 Persistent
Reservations. This functionality was added to OpenS
Right now s10u6 runs on ZFS off disk c1d0s0. A check proved that even
zones are copied good at last! Hurray. So, I have no more need of
c0d0s0. For data integrity is is very wise to use this disk in a
mirror, right?
Only problem: the system (zfs) disk is 320Mb; the older c0d0s0 drive is
only 250M
I fixed it by setting the *LK* to *NL* in /etc/shadow so that zfssnap can
execute cronjobs.
And I added this line to /etc/user_attr:
zfssnaptype=role;auths=solaris.smf.manage.zfs-auto-snapshot;profiles=ZFS
File System Management
to give zfssnap the rights to snapshot.
Maybe there is a smarter
Christiaan Willemsen schrieb:
>
>> do the disks show up as expected in format?
>>
>> Is your root pool just a single disk or is it a mirror of mutliple
>> disks? Did you attach/detach any disks to the root pool before rebooting?
>>
> No, we did nothing at all to the pools. The root pool is a ha
Christiaan Willemsen schrieb:
> Since the last reboot, our system wont boot anymore. It hangs at the "Use is
> subject to license terms." line for a few minutes, and then gives an error
> that it can't find the device it needs for making the root pool, and
> eventually reboots.
>
> We did not c
Since the last reboot, our system wont boot anymore. It hangs at the "Use is
subject to license terms." line for a few minutes, and then gives an error that
it can't find the device it needs for making the root pool, and eventually
reboots.
We did not change anything to the system or to the Ada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:33:52PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>> Now, the good filter could be to use MAGIC numbers within files or
>>> approach btrfs come up with, or maybe even both combined.
>> You are suggesting that
Per subject, has abyone sucessfully used b99 with HP hardware?
I've been using opensolaris for some time on HP Blade. Installing from
os200805 back in June works fine, with the caveat that I had to manually
add cpqary3 driver (v 1.90 was available back then).
After installation, I regulary upgrad
42 matches
Mail list logo
