"Brandon High" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e.,
> > with one disk offline)?
>
> [...]
> 1. Create a sparse file on an existing filesystem. The size should
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e., with
> one disk offline)? In that case I could use one of the 1 TB disks as
The official answer is no, but it might be possible to fool Solaris
into lettin
We have a moderately sized Cyrus installation with 2 TB of storage
and a few thousand simultaneous IMAP sessions. When one of the
backup processes is running during the day, there's a noticable
slowdown in IMAP client performance. When I start my `mutt' mail
reader, it pauses for several seconds
Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
>
> I also have a question about sharing a zfs from the global zone to a local
> zone. Are there any issues with this? We had an unfortunate sysadmin who did
> this and our systems hung. We have no logs that show anyhing at all, but I
> thought I'd ask just be sure.
>
>
Hi,
I'm about to convert my 3 * 1 TB raidz to a 5 * 1 TB raidz. Since raidz
can't be grown like that I have to find some place to move the data to
temporarily while I reformat the raidz. However, I'm short on disk
space (which is why I'm adding 2 new disks).
So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 T
After successful upgrade from snv_95 to snv_98 ( ufs boot -> zfs boot).
After luactive new BE with zfs. I am not able to ludelete old BE with ufs.
problem is, I think that zfs boot is /rpool/boot/grub.
ludelete snv_b95
System has findroot enabled GRUB
Checking if last BE on any disk...
BE is not
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM, jonathan sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would you mind helping me ask your tech guy whether there will be
> repercussions when I try to run this command in view of the situation below:
> # *zpool add -f zhome raidz c6t6006016056AC1A00C8FB7A6346F8DB11d0
> c6t60
Hi
Please see the query below. Appreciate any help.
Rgds
jonathan
Original Message
Would you mind helping me ask your tech guy whether there will be
repercussions when I try to run this command in view of the situation below:
# /*zpool add -f zhome raidz c6t6006016056AC1
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
> > define a lot :-)
> >
> > We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but
> perhaps it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering
> completed about 4386h earli
