Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs=off, but still being shared?

2008-07-12 Thread Martin Gisch
Hi Mark, Sharemgr output: -bash-3.2# sharemgr show -vp default nfs=() smb smb=() zfs zfs/rpool/export smb=() export=/export zfs/store/movies smb=() Movies=/store/movies zfs/store/overlord2 nfs=() smb=() overlord2=/store/overlord2 zfs/store/tv smb=()

Re: [zfs-discuss] Supermicro AOC-USAS-L8i

2008-07-12 Thread James C. McPherson
Tim wrote: > Bryan, > > Where did you find the sas to sata cables? I've been looking but > haven't found anything at the usual watering holes. I assume you > grabbed mini-sas to 4 sata? Hi Tim, I did a quick search with google: http://www.google.com/search?q=sff8087+sff+cable and came up with

Re: [zfs-discuss] Supermicro AOC-USAS-L8i

2008-07-12 Thread Tim
Bryan, Where did you find the sas to sata cables? I've been looking but haven't found anything at the usual watering holes. I assume you grabbed mini-sas to 4 sata? Thanks! --tim On 7/12/08, Bryan Wagoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's to hoping it works, I just pulled the trigger o

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4540

2008-07-12 Thread Dale Ghent
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > > Yes, of course. But there is only one CF slot. Cool coincidence that the following article on CF cards and DMA transfers was posted to /. http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/12/1851251 I take it that Sun's going ship/sell O

Re: [zfs-discuss] Supermicro AOC-USAS-L8i

2008-07-12 Thread Bryan Wagoner
Here's to hoping it works, I just pulled the trigger on this at provantage for my Home NAS in hopes to replace the PCI card I have in their now from Supermicro. I also picked up a couple of SAS to SATA cables for it too. If anyone has verified it works, please let me know. Thanks, ~Bryan

Re: [zfs-discuss] sharenfs=off, but still being shared?

2008-07-12 Thread Mark Shellenbaum
Martin Gisch wrote: > I noticed an oddity on my 2008.05 box today. > Created a new zfs file system that I was planning to nfs share out to an old > FreeBSD box, after I put sharenfs=on for it, I noticed there was a bunch of > others shared too: > > -bash-3.2# dfshares -F nfs > RESOURCE

Re: [zfs-discuss] Largest (in number of files) ZFS instance tested

2008-07-12 Thread Peter Tribble
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: >> >> (The backup problem is the real stumbling block. And backup is an area ripe >> for disruptive innovation.) >> >> > Is down to volume of data, or many small files? Many small files. We could handle

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4540

2008-07-12 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
> Well, I'm not holding out much hope of Sun working > with these suppliers any time soon. I asked Vmetro > why they don't work with Sun considering how well ZFS > seems to fit with their products, and this was the > reply I got: > > "Micro Memory has a long history of working with Sun, > and I w

[zfs-discuss] sharenfs=off, but still being shared?

2008-07-12 Thread Martin Gisch
I noticed an oddity on my 2008.05 box today. Created a new zfs file system that I was planning to nfs share out to an old FreeBSD box, after I put sharenfs=on for it, I noticed there was a bunch of others shared too: -bash-3.2# dfshares -F nfs RESOURCE SERVER ACC