Charles Soto wrote:
> On 6/27/08 8:55 AM, "Mark J Musante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, wan_jm wrote:
>>
>>> the procedure is follows:
>>> 1. mkdir /tank
>>> 2. touch /tank/a
>>> 3. zpool create tank c0d0p3
>>> this command give the following error message:
>>> cannot mount
On 6/27/08 8:55 AM, "Mark J Musante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, wan_jm wrote:
>
>> the procedure is follows:
>> 1. mkdir /tank
>> 2. touch /tank/a
>> 3. zpool create tank c0d0p3
>> this command give the following error message:
>> cannot mount '/tank': directory is not empt
I wanted to resurrect an old dual P3 system with a couple of IDE drives
to use as a low power quiet NIS/DHCP/FlexLM server so I tried installing
ZFS boot from build 90.
The install ran through without issue, creating a mirror pool on the two
drives. On reboot, I was surprised to see 2 sets of gru
Aaron Moore wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to create a file server that will be used across multiple OSs and
> I wanted to create the root pool/zfs system with mixed case. I am not sure
> how to do this since the root zfs fs gets automatically created without this
> flag when I create the pool
Richard Elling wrote:
> Erik Trimble wrote:
>
>> * 5.25" CDROM-form-factor RAM disk, as above
>>
>>
>
> CD-ROMs are dead. With the size of slim DVDs today, you wouldn't
> be able to put much space in them.
>
>
The point here is a 5.25" half height device, that will fit in a drive
ba
Hello,
I am trying to create a file server that will be used across multiple OSs and I
wanted to create the root pool/zfs system with mixed case. I am not sure how to
do this since the root zfs fs gets automatically created without this flag when
I create the pool.
Is there a way to do this?
I had a friend rebuild his system and instead of running a "zpool import" he
ran a "zpool create". Sadly this means he has an empty raidz disk now. A
"zpool import" only shows the last zpool he created. a "zpool import -D" shows
now destroyed pools for importing.
Any suggestions as to data r
> "et" == Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
et> SSD used to refer strictly to standard DRAM backed with a
et> battery (and, maybe some sort of a fancy enclosure with a hard
et> drive to write all DRAM data to after a power outage).
et> * 3.5" LP disk form factor, SCSI h
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Hechinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:02:43PM -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, we need to be careful here with our terminology.
> >>
> >
> > You are completely and 100% correct, Erik. I've
On Jun 28, 2008, at 10:17, Richard Elling wrote:
> This week, Verident announced a system using Spansion EcoRAMs
> (DRAM + NOR Flash on a DIMM form factor) for main memory.
> This is almost getting there, but seems to require some special OS
> support, which is not surprising. The holy grail is f
I'm using ZFS and a drive has failed.
I am quite new to solaris and Frankly I seem to know more about ZFS and how it
works then I do the OS.
I have the hot spare taking over the failed disk and from here, do I need to
remove the disk on the OS side (if so what is proper) or do I need to take
ac
Erik Trimble wrote:
> Brian Hechinger wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:02:43PM -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately, we need to be careful here with our terminology.
>>>
>>>
>> You are completely and 100% correct, Erik. I've been throwing the
>> term SSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James C. McPherson wrote:
| Matt Harrison wrote:
|
|> I seem to have overlooked the first part of your reply, I can just
|> replace the disks one at a time, and of course the pool would rebuild
|> itself onto the new disk. Would this automatically
Matt Harrison wrote:
> I seem to have overlooked the first part of your reply, I can just
> replace the disks one at a time, and of course the pool would rebuild
> itself onto the new disk. Would this automatically extend the size of
> the pool once all 3 disks are replaced?
Yes - once the re
Le 28 juin 08 à 05:14, Robert Milkowski a écrit :
> Hello Mark,
>
> Tuesday, April 15, 2008, 8:32:32 PM, you wrote:
>
> MM> The new write throttle code put back into build 87 attempts to
> MM> smooth out the process. We now measure the amount of time it
> takes
> MM> to sync each transaction g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Harrison wrote:
| Tomas Ögren wrote:
| | On 28 June, 2008 - Matt Harrison sent me these 0,6K bytes:
| |
| |> Hi gurus,
| |>
| |> Just wanted some input on this for the day when an upgrade is
necessary.
| |>
| |> Lets say I have simple pool made up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomas Ögren wrote:
| On 28 June, 2008 - Matt Harrison sent me these 0,6K bytes:
|
|> Hi gurus,
|>
|> Just wanted some input on this for the day when an upgrade is necessary.
|>
|> Lets say I have simple pool made up of 3 750gb SATA disks in raidz1,
|>
On 28 June, 2008 - Matt Harrison sent me these 0,6K bytes:
> Hi gurus,
>
> Just wanted some input on this for the day when an upgrade is necessary.
>
> Lets say I have simple pool made up of 3 750gb SATA disks in raidz1,
> giving around 1.3tb usable space. If we wanted to upgrade the disks,
>
Hi gurus,
Just wanted some input on this for the day when an upgrade is necessary.
Lets say I have simple pool made up of 3 750gb SATA disks in raidz1,
giving around 1.3tb usable space. If we wanted to upgrade the disks,
what is the accepted procedure? There are 6 SATA ports in the machine in
James C. McPherson wrote:
Andrius wrote:
Hi,
there is mirrored pool in i86 system with Solaris 10. The one disc is
internal SATA via PCI link, another USB mobile disc. OS does not boot
when USB is plugged on. It is necessary to take it off, then system
boots, then plug it on and then work OK
I believe there's a block rewrite function being worked on, which if memory
serves will enable further technologies such as changing raid-z stripe size on
the fly, defrag, etc.
I doubt 'soon' is a word you could use to describe the timeframe for these
arriving however.
This message posted f
Thanks, that's something I hadn't realised. After googling, I've found this
article comparing the i-RAM with a couple of SSD's, and the difference is quite
something:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/ssd-iram_5.html
However, the SATA interface's limitations soon seem to even thi
22 matches
Mail list logo
