Re: [zfs-discuss] 'zfs list' output showing incorrect mountpoint after boot -Z

2008-06-26 Thread Mark J Musante
On Jun 26, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Sumit Gupta wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the snapshot of the original installation on > snv_92. snv_92.backup is the clone. You can see that the / is > mounted on snv_92.backup but in zfs list output it still shows that > '/' is mounted on snv_92. > It's showi

[zfs-discuss] 'zfs list' output showing incorrect mountpoint after boot -Z

2008-06-26 Thread Sumit Gupta
I installed snv_92 with zfs root. Then took a snapshot of the root and clonned it. Now I am booting from the clone using the -Z option. The system boots fine from the clone but 'zfs list' still shows that the '/' is mounted on the original mountpoint instead of the clone even though the output o

[zfs-discuss] zfs send/receive locks system threads (Bug?)

2008-06-26 Thread Paul
Dear experts, when migrating from a 6 disk to a 4 disk raidz1 zpool with 'zfs send -R|zfs receive', the system's response time dropped noticeably. The run queue increased to 28-32, and 'prstat -Lm' showed that several system threads were locked repeatedly - noticeably fmd, devfsd and many of th

Re: [zfs-discuss] Oops: zfs-auto-snapshot with at scheduling

2008-06-26 Thread Tim Foster
Hey Nils, On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 09:37 -0700, Nils Goroll wrote: > I'll attach a new version zfs-auto-snapshot including some more > improvements, and probably some new bugs. Just to let you know that I *have* seen your mails on this and really appreciate getting the feedback, but I just haven't h

[zfs-discuss] How about an zfs-auto-snapshot project

2008-06-26 Thread Nils Goroll
And how about making this an official project? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Oops: zfs-auto-snapshot with at scheduling

2008-06-26 Thread Nils Goroll
Hi all, I'll attach a new version zfs-auto-snapshot including some more improvements, and probably some new bugs. Seriously, I have tested it, but certainly not all functionality, so please let me know about any (new) problems you come across. Except from the change log: - Added support to sch

Re: [zfs-discuss] Questions

2008-06-26 Thread Richard Elling
Mickae?l ABISROR wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> here are some questions about ZFS >>> >>> When accessing to RAW volumes under ZFS do we go through cache or >>> not? If yes can we disable it? >>> I believe Zvols are uncached. >>> They use Veritas QuickIO (ODM) and they want to compare with ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] raid card vs zfs

2008-06-26 Thread Mertol Ozyoney
Please note that IO speeds exceeding 1 GB/sec can be limited by several components including the OS or device drivers. Currrent maximum performance I have seen is around 1,25 GB through dual IB. Anyway, that's a great realworld performance, considering the price and size of the unit. Mertol O

Re: [zfs-discuss] raid card vs zfs

2008-06-26 Thread Mertol Ozyoney
Good analysis. Generally X4500 can stream 2,5 GB/sec disk to RAM and around 1,2-1,4 GB/sec ram to disk. Network to disk or disk to network most of the time depends on the network interface. With Infiniband we are seeing 1 GB/sec transfer speeds [2 OS disks, 6 spares] With dual IB initial result

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send and recordsize

2008-06-26 Thread Peter Boros
Hi, Is there any way to do this in Solaris 10? For example create an empty zfs filesystem before receiving and then receive the stream without touching the metadata? On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:37 PM, James Andrewartha wrote: > Peter Boros wrote: >> Hi James, >> >> Of course, changing the recordsi

[zfs-discuss] Questions

2008-06-26 Thread Mickae?l ABISROR
>> Hi all, >> >> here are some questions about ZFS >> >> When accessing to RAW volumes under ZFS do we go through cache or >> not? If yes can we disable it? >> They use Veritas QuickIO (ODM) and they want to compare with ZFS and >> also ZFS with and without cache. >> >> Do we have some benchmark