Xavier Canehan wrote:
> Carson,
> are you sure about the patch number ? I have been unable to get a french
> support guy to find it.
> You are mentionning an "official" IDR patch for Solaris 10 x86, update 4,
> aren't you ?
We received it from Sun Support for our Sol 10 U4 X4500. Not sure how
"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not safe to jump to this conclusion. Disk drivers that support FMA
> won't log error messages to /var/adm/messages. As more support for I/O
> FMA shows up, you won't see random spew in the messages file any more.
That is a Very Bad Idea. Please convey this to wh
> Hello andrew,
>
> Thursday, April 24, 2008, 11:03:48 AM, you wrote:
>
> a> What is the reasoning behind ZFS not enabling the
> write cache for
> a> the root pool? Is there a way of forcing ZFS to
> enable the write cache?
>
> The reason is that EFI labels are not supported for
> booting.
IIRC
> Note that it is expected that the cluster will force
> import, so in a
i was talking about creation, not import.
> You must be running an older version of Solaris. The
s10u4 + sc 3.2
Anyway, bug has now been accepted.
With cluster and SAN, zfs does _yet_ not behave normally :)
Thanks for your
