Be careful of changing the Max_Payload_Size parameter. It needs to match, and
be supported, between all PCI-E components which might communicate with each
other. You can tell what values are supported by reading the Device
Capabilities Register and checking the Max_Payload_Size Supported bits.
Chris Kirby wrote:
> Balaji Kutty wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
>> that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
>> see this option in s10u4.
>
> This RFE (6351954) appears to have been integrated into s10u4.
> What error m
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
> You can get "support" for SXDE. Perhaps you already have it.
> http://www.sun.com/service/subscriptions/sxde.xml
We have a ton of hardware under Silver/Gold support, quite likely we might
already qualify for this, although I was previously unaware of i
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rocky wrote:
> I run a few NetApp boxes, must admit I've never noticed the ACL mapping
> sucking before. How does yours suck?
It's been almost a year since we evaluated Netapp, I'm a little hazy on the
details.
Basically, NetApp has three different ideas of the permissions
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>
>> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
>>> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>>>
>> Why not the in kernel CIFS se
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
> > home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>
> Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
An official supported version of Solaris
David Magda wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 07:33, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out
>>> user
>>> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>> Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
>
> It
On Mar 13, 2008, at 07:33, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out
>> user
>> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>
> Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
It's an option, but not everyone
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Roy Butler wrote:
> > a NetApp could do some kind of mapping to satisfy
> your idea, but of even
> > that I'd be skeptical.
>
> We eval'd a netapp box. ACL mapping on netapp sucks.
> You really need to
> either use unix or windows privs, not both.
I run a few NetApp boxes,
Hello all,
I'm willing to configure "telemetry" in SC 3.2, but i did not see how...
The two ways that i did find to configure it is:
1) "clsetup" or
2) Using "sctelemetry" resource utility
The problem is that in the both we need a "FilesystemMountPoints" property
configured, and that property
Tim wrote:
>
>
>
>
> He wants to mount the ZFS filesystem (I'm assuming off of a backend
> SAN storage array) to two heads, then round-robin NFS connections
> between the heads to essentially *double* the throughput.
pNFS is the droid you are looking for.
On 3/13/08, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> msl wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I was thinking if such scenario could be possible:
> > 1 - Export/import a ZFS filesystem in two solaris servers.
> > 2 - Export that filesystem (NFS).
> > 3 - Mount that filesystem on clients in two different
msl wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was thinking if such scenario could be possible:
> 1 - Export/import a ZFS filesystem in two solaris servers.
> 2 - Export that filesystem (NFS).
> 3 - Mount that filesystem on clients in two different mount points (just to
> authenticate in both servers/UDP).
> 4a - U
>> Also, what other things are coming with ZFS boot in b87? Or is it just
>> support for it in the installer?
>>
> - a fair amount of cleanup and bug fixes
> - support for swap and dump devices in pools
> - sparc support
> - installation support
Cool. But again, it's the Caiman installer bu
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
> that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
> see this option in s10u4.
This RFE (6351954) appears to have been integrated into s10u4.
What error message are you seeing when you
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
> that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
> see this option in s10u4.
Hmm, I thought that had made it back to s10u4, but I guess not.
>
> How can I disable zfs extended attr
Hello all,
I was thinking if such scenario could be possible:
1 - Export/import a ZFS filesystem in two solaris servers.
2 - Export that filesystem (NFS).
3 - Mount that filesystem on clients in two different mount points (just to
authenticate in both servers/UDP).
4a - Use some kind of "man-in-t
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zf
I figured the following ZFS 'success story' may interest some readers here.
I was interested to see how much sequential read/write performance it would be
possible to obtain from ZFS running on commodity hardware with modern features
such as PCI-E busses, SATA disks, well-designed SATA controlle
Hi,
I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
see this option in s10u4.
How can I disable zfs extended attributes on s10u4?
I'm not in the zfs-discuss alias. Please respond to me directly.
Thanks
Balaji
__
20 matches
Mail list logo
