This is true, but I think it's the testing bit that worries me. It's
hard to lab out, and fully test an equivalent setup that has 350 active
clients pounding on it to test usability and stability. One of our
boxes has a boat load of special software running and various tweaks,
that also wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If a machine has very obvious memory corruption due to bad ram, is there
anything beyond scrub that can verify the integrity of a pool? Am I
correct in assuming that scrub will fix checksum errors, but not
metadata errors?
- --
Christopher Gorski
mai
I'm not an Oracle expert but I don't think Oracle checksumming can
correct data. If you have ZFS checksums enabled, and you're mirroring in
your zpools, then ZFS can self-correct as long the checksum on the other
half of the mirror is good.
Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
> Don't take my words as an expe
Don't take my words as an expert advice, as I am newbie when it comes to
ZFS.
If I am not mistaken, if you are only using Oracle on the particular Zpol,
Oracle Checksum offers better protection against data corruption.
You can disable ZFS checksums.
Best regards
Mertol
Mertol Ozyoney
Storag
On Jan 30, 2008 2:27 PM, Jonathan Loran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before ranting any more, I'll do the test of disabling the ZIL. We may
> have to build out these systems with Open Solaris, but that will be hard
> as they are in production. I would have to install the new OS on test
> systems
On Feb 2, 2008, at 03:16, Jayakrishna wrote:
> is it possible to create a ZFS file system & boot the Solaris OS
> on the ZFS file system. Is this supported ? If not when it will be
> supported. Does booting on ZFS partition is supported on any other
> platform eg x86.
This was just discuss
On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Depending on needs for space vs. performance, I'd probably pixk
>> eithr 5*9 or
>> 9*5, with 1 hot spare.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> How you can check the speed (I'm totally newbie on Solaris)
>
> We're d
John-Paul Drawneek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Vincent Fox wrote:
>> | So the point is, a JBOD with a flash drive in one
>> (or two to mirror
>> the ZIL) of the slots would be a lot SIMPLER.
>>
>> I guess a USB pendrive would be slower than a
>> harddisk. Bad p
Someone had tell me that s10u5 will not contain your need SSD or NVRAM separate
for zfs intent log.
"Finally, s10u5 will only contain a small part of bugfix. But s10u6 will be a
quite huge wad of features/fixes."
Set nocacheflush=1 will huge improve your nfs client's performance when use a
NVR
Hi,
I understands the upgrade issue surrounding the patching and upgrade
tools. Can I get around this with some trickery using quota and
reservation? I would quota and reserve for a pool/somezonepath some
capacity, say 10GB, and in this way allocate a fixed capacity per zonepath.
Will this wo
Hi,
Solaris 8/07 does not support zfs boot. ZFS boot support currently only
available on Solaris Express (Nevada) on x86.
Rgds,
Andre W.
Jayakrishna wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have the following machine
> sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T1000
>
> & Solaris 10 8/07 OS , is it possible to create a ZFS file s
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Vincent Fox wrote:
> | So the point is, a JBOD with a flash drive in one
> (or two to mirror
> the ZIL) of the slots would be a lot SIMPLER.
>
> I guess a USB pendrive would be slower than a
> harddisk. Bad performance
> for the ZIL.
>
Does
Hi ,
I have the following machine
sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T1000
& Solaris 10 8/07 OS , is it possible to create a ZFS file system & boot the
Solaris OS on the ZFS file system. Is this supported ? If not when it will be
supported. Does booting on ZFS partition is supported on any other platfo
13 matches
Mail list logo
