http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461
On Jan 21, 2008 5:09 PM, Thiago Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> s
The bug is being actively worked at this time (it just got a boost
in urgency as a result of the issues it was causing for the
zfs boot project). It is likely that there will be a fix soon
(sooner than zfs boot will be available). In the
meantime, I know of no workaround. Maybe someone
else doe
Hello,
I have several servers swapping to ZVOLs, and I appears to be encountering the
below bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6528296
Does anyone have any comments on the reliability of using ZVOLs for swap? Are
there any workarounds to prevent bug 6528296?
This message
It'd be a really nice feature. Combined with baked-in replication it
would be a nice alternative to our DD appliances.
-J
On Jan 21, 2008 2:03 PM, John Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great question. I've been wondering this myself over the past few
> weeks, as de-dup is becoming more pop
I have a need to stream video over nfs. video is stored on zfs. every 10
minutes or so, the video will freeze, and then 1 minute later it
resumes. This doesn't happen from an nfs mount on ufs. zfs server is a
32 bit P4 box with 512MB, running nexenta in plain text mode, and
nothing else, really. Tr
Great question. I've been wondering this myself over the past few
weeks, as de-dup is becoming more popular a term in our IT department.
-john
On Jan 20, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Narayan Venkat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is de-duplication in ZFS an active project? If so, can somebody
> share details about
Hey Thiago,
SVM is a direct replacement for LVM. Also, you'll notice about a 30%
performance boost if you move from LVM to SVM. At least we did when we
moved a couple of years ago.
-J
On Jan 21, 2008 8:09 AM, Thiago Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like
> I don't believe this is true. Online replacement is smart enough
> to pick this up. Where you hare to re-import is when you change
> the size of a LUN without doing a zpool replace.
I see. I have never had the hardware necessary to actually try hotswaps, but I
remember some people complaining
J Duff wrote:
> The best internals discussion I have found so far is the ZFS Source Tour
> at http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/, but I was hoping to
> find even more detailed information.
check out the "ZFS: Under the Hood" by myself and Jason Banham. i
presented this at the Lond
The September 16, 2006 entry in Jeff Bonwick’s blog says “Bill Moore and I will
host a four-hour deep dive into ZFS internals at the 2006 Storage Developer
Conference in San Jose.” Were the contents of this deep dive ever published in
a document or video? If not, will there be another ZFS intern
Thiago Sobral wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> solution that I'll adopt. I don't have Veritas here.
Specifically what is SVM missin
Thiago Sobral schrieb:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> solution that I'll adopt. I don't have Veritas here.
>
Why do you think it doesn'
Hi folks,
I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
ZFS can solve this issue.
I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
solution that I'll adopt. I don't have Veritas here.
I created a pool with name "black" and a volume "lv00", then creat
Torsten Paul Eichstädt wrote:
> a loopback mount, not a dataset, does what you want.
> in zonecfg, do:
>> add fs
>> set special=/export/home
>> set dir=/home
>> set type=lofs
>> add options rw,nodevices,noexec,nosetuid
>> end
>> verify
> # man zonecfg
>
> Make sure the local zones have the same us
Matty wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2008 7:35 AM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sengor wrote:
>>> On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
> production environment?
Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it
15 matches
Mail list logo
