Jay Calaus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> # cat /etc/release
>Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86
>Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Asse
KASTURI VENKATA SESHA SASIDHAR wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on open solaris bugs .. and need to change the code of
> df in the above two folders..
>
> I would like to know why there are two df's with diff options in the
> respective folders..
> /usr/bin/df is different is from /usr/xp
Shawn Ferry wrote:
>> It would be tempting to add the bootadm update-archive to the boot
>> process, as I would rather have it come up half-assed, than not come
>> up at all.
> It is part of the shutdown process, you just need to stop crashing :)
I put a cron entry that does it manually every
>From a programming perspective, you can get the EZFS_* errno values from
libzfs.h. However, these don't necessarily have a 1:1 correspondence
with error messages, which may be more informative, include more text,
etc. If you search for callers of zfs_error() (which sets the 'action'
and errno wh
Hello all, looking to get the master list of all the error codes/
messages which I could get back from doing bad things in zfs.
I am wrappering the zfs command into python and want to be able to
correctly pick up on errors which are returned from certain operations.
I did a source code search
Shawn Ferry wrote:
>
> It is part of the shutdown process, you just need to stop crashing :)
>
That looks like a good idea on paper, but what other unforeseen
side-effects will we get from not crashing?!
Apart from the one crash with quotacheck, it is currently running quite
well. It updat
Hello,
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 09 June 2006
I want to i
format -e
then from there, re-label using SMI label, versus EFI.
Cheers
Al Slater wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the quickest way of clearing the label information on a disk
> that has been previously used in a zpool?
>
> regards
>
> - --
> Al Sl
http://www.wiredzone.com/xq/asp/ic.10016527/qx/itemdesc.htm
On Dec 17, 2007 2:01 PM, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do you get an 8 port SATA card that works with Solaris for around $100?
>
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
Where do you get an 8 port SATA card that works with Solaris for around $100?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
On Dec 17, 2007 4:18 PM, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The pool holds home directories so small sequential writes to one
> > large file present one of a few interesting use cases.
>
> Can you be more specific here ?
>
> Do you have a body of application that would do small
>
>> r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
>> 0.0 48.00.0 3424.6 0.0 35.00.0 728.9 0 100 c2t8d0
> That service time is just terrible!
yea, that service time is unreasonable. almost a second for each
command? and 35 more commands queued? (reorder =
We are currently running sun cluster 3.2 on solaris 10u3. We are using ufs/vxvm
4.1 as our shared file systems. However, I would like to migrate to HA-NFS on
ZFS. Since there is no conversion process from UFS to ZFS other than copy, I
would like to migrate on my own time. To do this I am plannin
Frank Penczek writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 10:37 AM, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > dd uses a default block size of 512B. Does this map to your
> > expected usage ? When I quickly tested the CPU cost of small
> > read from cache, I did see that ZFS was more costly
Hi Al,
That depends on whether you want to go back to a VTOC/SMI label or
keep the EFI label created by ZFS. To keep the EFI label just
repartition and use the partitions as desired. If you want to go back
to a VTOC/SMI label you have to run format -e and then relabel the
disk and select SMI.
Be
Hi,
On Dec 17, 2007 10:37 AM, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> dd uses a default block size of 512B. Does this map to your
> expected usage ? When I quickly tested the CPU cost of small
> read from cache, I did see that ZFS was more costly than UFS
> up to a crossover between 8K and 16
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies.
To clear up one issue, when I mentioned snapshots, I [i]was[/i] talking about
snapshots performed by the array and/or replication software. In order to take
a ZFS snapshot I would need access to the secondary copies of the data, and
that is not generally possibl
I'm going to be installing B77 in the next couple days. I've built a
server using a SiL3124 card, but the BIOS of the machine for whatever
reason doesn't get along with grub so I'm not able to actually boot
from it.
This isn't a huge concern, as I've orderd (and hopefully they will arrive
soon) a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
What is the quickest way of clearing the label information on a disk
that has been previously used in a zpool?
regards
- --
Al Slater
Technical Director
SCL
Phone : +44 (0)1273 07
Fax : +44 (0)1273 01
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stant
sudarshan sridhar wrote:
> I would like to know the method of getting/setting Extended Attributes
> (EAs) for files and directoreis.
From an application layer openat(2).
> Also I would like to know is there any difference in getting/setting EAs
> from UFS filesystem ?. I mean can we use same
I would like to know the method of getting/setting Extended Attributes (EAs)
for files and directoreis.
Also I would like to know is there any difference in getting/setting EAs from
UFS filesystem ?. I mean can we use same system calls, open, openat etc... to
extract EA information?
If
Hello Jeff,
Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:42:18 AM, you wrote:
JB> In short, yes. The enabling technology for all of this is something
JB> we call bp rewrite -- that is, the ability to rewrite an existing
JB> block pointer (bp) to a new location. Since ZFS is COW, this would
JB> be trivial in t
dd uses a default block size of 512B. Does this map to your
expected usage ? When I quickly tested the CPU cost of small
read from cache, I did see that ZFS was more costly than UFS
up to a crossover between 8K and 16K. We might need a more
comprehensive study of that (data in/out of cache, di
In short, yes. The enabling technology for all of this is something
we call bp rewrite -- that is, the ability to rewrite an existing
block pointer (bp) to a new location. Since ZFS is COW, this would
be trivial in the absence of snapshots -- just touch all the data.
But because a block may appea
Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Sunday, December 16, 2007, 9:54:18 PM, you wrote:
>
> JCM> hi Frank,
>
> JCM> there is an interesting pattern here (at least, to my
> JCM> untrained eyes) - your %b starts off quite low:
> JCM> All of which, to me, look like you're filling a buffer
Hey folks,
Does anybody know if any of these are on the roadmap for ZFS, or have any idea
how long it's likely to be before we see them (we're in no rush - late 2008
would be fine with us, but it would be nice to know they're being worked on)?
I've seen many people ask for the ability to expand
Hello James,
Sunday, December 16, 2007, 9:54:18 PM, you wrote:
JCM> hi Frank,
JCM> there is an interesting pattern here (at least, to my
JCM> untrained eyes) - your %b starts off quite low:
JCM> Frank Penczek wrote:
JCM>
>> ---
>> dd'ing to NFS mount:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]://tmp> dd if=./f
It's good he didn't mail you, now we all know some under-the-hood details via
Googling ;)
Thanks to both of you for this :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
