On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Alderman, Sean wrote:
> This is good news, thank you for the blog!
>
> If I may ask a couple of questions to the community on the topic of
> OLTP
> workload and ZFS...
>
> 1. When evaluating ZFS for our Oracle systems (heavy 8K uncached
> workload), our DBAs used
Hello Joel,
Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 8:19:56 PM, you wrote:
JM> Hi Robert,
JM> It should work. We have not had the time or resources to test it (we are
JM> busy qualifying the 2530 (SAS array) with an upcoming MPxIO enabled MPT
JM> driver and SATA drive support).
JM> I do not know if MPxIO wil
Hi,
sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn't find a good answer searching
the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :)
However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a
vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie.
ZFS
zonedata/zfs
hi Jürgen,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 05:04 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote:
> How about a new feature for "zpool create" and "zfs create" to
> allow creation of a zpool or zfs that is not using the newest
> version but some older version
Yep, that's there already - PSARC 2007/328 gives "zfs upgrade" and y
Yesterday I was surprised because an old snv_66 kernel
(installed as a new zfs rootfs) refused to mount.
Error message was
Mismatched versions: File system is version 2 on-disk format,
which is incompatible with this software version 1!
I tried to prepare that snv_66 rootfs when running
