eric kustarz wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>
>
>> You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar! Seriously, this is exactly
>> the information I was looking for, thank you very much!
>>
>> Would you happen to know if this has improved since build 63 or if
>> chipset
On 7/13/07, Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ZFS needs to use the top level multipath device or bad things will
> probably happen in a failover or in initial zpool creation. Fopr
> example: You'll try to use the device on two paths and cause a lun
> failover to occur.
>
> Mpxio fixes a l
On 7/15/07, JS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I run zfs (v2 and v3) on Emulex and Sun Branded emulex on SPARC with
> Powerpath 4.5.0(and MPxIOin other cases) and Clariion arrays and have never
> seen this problem. In fact I'm trying to get rid of my PowerPath instances
> and standardizing on MP
> Shows up as lpfc (is that Emulex?)
lpfc (or fibre-channel) is an Emulex branded emulex card device - sun branded
emulex uses the emlxs driver.
I run zfs (v2 and v3) on Emulex and Sun Branded emulex on SPARC with Powerpath
4.5.0(and MPxIOin other cases) and Clariion arrays and have never se
I did that, and here are the results from the ZFS jury:
bash-3.00$ timex dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=128k count=8192
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
real 19.40
user 0.01
sys1.54
That is, 1GB created on 20sec = 50MB/sec. That is better, but still not good,
as
