> Apologies in advance for the newbie internals question, but could
> someone please give me a pointer to how ZFS snapshots cause future
> modifications to files to be written to different disk blocks? I'm
> looking at OpenSolaris NV bld 66.
"snapshots" don't really cause that. ZFS never overwri
Apologies in advance for the newbie internals question, but could someone
please give me a pointer to how ZFS snapshots cause future modifications to
files to be written to different disk blocks? I'm looking at OpenSolaris NV
bld 66.
How do snapshots interact with open files or files with page
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:26, Albert Chin wrote:
> PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> how to take advantage of it?
For those not in the know, PSARC 2007/171 is a separate intent log
for ZFS:
http://cz.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/171/
Manoj Joseph wrote:
> Manoj Joseph wrote:
>> Manoj Joseph wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In brief, what I am trying to do is to use libzpool to access a zpool
>>> - like ztest does.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> No, AFAIK, the pool is not damaged. But yes, it looks like the device
>>> can't be written to by the us
Experts,
Sorry if this is a FAQ but I'm not on this alias.
Please reply directly to me.
I'm working on a project setting up a web portal that
will use 2 hosts for load balancing ftp's. I wanted to
use ZFS to showcase it to our customer.
What I've been trying to setup is anonymous ftp to a host
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> Good point. The speeds for the following don't seem very impressive:
>> http://www.adtron.com/products/A25fb-SerialATAFlashDisk.html
>>
>> http://www.sandisk.com/OEM/ProductCatalog(1321)-SanDisk_SSD_SATA_5000_25.aspx
>
>
> The adton URL leaves
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:10:25PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:02:24AM -0700, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:26:20AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> > > how to take advantage o
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:02:24AM -0700, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:26:20AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> > how to take advantage of it?
> >
> > Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would
Adam Leventhal wrote:
> Flash SSDs typically boast a huge number of _read_ IOPS (thousands), but
> very few write IOPS (tens). The write throughput numbers quoted are almost
> certainly for non-synchronous writes whose latency can easily be in the
> milisecond range. STEC makes an interesting devic
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:26:20AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> how to take advantage of it?
>
> Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
> if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:31:28AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:01:50AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> >> Albert Chin wrote:
> >>> Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
> >>> if the array NVRAM would be available fo
Flash SSDs typically boast a huge number of _read_ IOPS (thousands), but
very few write IOPS (tens). The write throughput numbers quoted are almost
certainly for non-synchronous writes whose latency can easily be in the
milisecond range. STEC makes an interesting device which offers fast
_synchrono
Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:01:50AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
>> Albert Chin wrote:
>>> Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
>>> if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage. It would also
>>> be nice for extra hardware (PCI-X, PCIe c
Alderman, Sean wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to the list as of today, I've come because I'm fascinated with
> ZFS and my company has just begun an adventure into the unknown with
> Solaris 10.
>
> We've got a few Sun Fire X4200's and a few Sun Fire V245's that we're
> playing with and we've come
David Smith wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had a script to parse the "zpool status -v" output
> into a more machine readable format?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discu
>Good point. The speeds for the following don't seem very impressive:
> http://www.adtron.com/products/A25fb-SerialATAFlashDisk.html
> http://www.sandisk.com/OEM/ProductCatalog(1321)-SanDisk_SSD_SATA_5000_25.aspx
The adton URL leaves out IOops altogether.
Sandisks limit itself to read IOops
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:01:50AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
> > if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage. It would also
> > be nice for extra hardware (PCI-X, PCIe card) that added NVRAM
William Loewe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using a Sun Fire X4500 "Thumper" and trying to get some sense of the best
> performance I can get from it with zfs.
>
> I'm running without mirroring or raid, and have checksumming turned off. I
> built the zfs with these commands:
>
> # zpool create mypo
I was wondering if anyone had a script to parse the "zpool status -v" output
into a more machine readable format?
Thanks,
David
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolari
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:31:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> >how to take advantage of it?
> >
> >Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
> >if the array NVRAM would be available for Z
Hi all,
I'm new to the list as of today, I've come because I'm fascinated with
ZFS and my company has just begun an adventure into the unknown with
Solaris 10.
We've got a few Sun Fire X4200's and a few Sun Fire V245's that we're
playing with and we've come to a decision point about how to confi
Albert Chin wrote:
> PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
> how to take advantage of it?
Should be part of b68.
> Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
> if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage. It would also
> be nic
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> William Loewe
>
> I'm using a Sun Fire X4500 "Thumper" and trying to get some
> sense of the best performance I can get from it with zfs.
>
> I'm running without mirroring or raid, and have checksumming
> turned off. I built
Hello,
I'm using a Sun Fire X4500 "Thumper" and trying to get some sense of the best
performance I can get from it with zfs.
I'm running without mirroring or raid, and have checksumming turned off. I
built the zfs with these commands:
# zpool create mypool disk0 disk1 ... diskN
# zfs set chec
I've found it's fairly easy to trim down a 'core' install, installing
to a temporary UFS root,
doing the ufs -> zfs thing, and then re-use the old UFS slice as swap.
Obviously you need a separate /boot slice in this setup.
On 03/07/07, Douglas Atique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid the S
>PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
>how to take advantage of it?
>
>Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
>if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage. It would also
>be nice for extra hardware (PCI-X, PCIe card) that a
PSARC 2007/171 will be available in b68. Any documentation anywhere on
how to take advantage of it?
Some of the Sun storage arrays contain NVRAM. It would be really nice
if the array NVRAM would be available for ZIL storage. It would also
be nice for extra hardware (PCI-X, PCIe card) that added NV
hi all,
I was extracting a 8GB tar and encountered this panic. the system was
just installed last week with Solaris 10 update 3 and the latest
recommended patches as of June 26. I can provide more output from mdb,
or the crashdump itself if it would be of any use.
any ideas what's going on her
I'm afraid the Solaris installer won't let me stop the process just before it
starts copying files to the target filesystem. It would be very nice to get
away with the UFS slice altogether, but between filesystem creation and
initialisation (which seems mandatory) and copying there is no pause w
29 matches
Mail list logo
