Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs data recovery bug?

2007-06-04 Thread Eric Schrock
As described in the 'status' section, ZFS was able to recover from the error and applications are unaffected. To be sure, can you 'fmdump -e' output? You can also do a 'zpool scrub' and see if that produces an error. >From the ZFS perspective, you had one disk return a single failure, but we we

Re: [zfs-discuss] Multiple OpenSolaris boxes with access to zfs pools

2007-06-04 Thread eric kustarz
Hi Jeff, You should take a look at this: http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/poor_man_s_cluster_end We added the hostid/hostname to the vdev label. What this means is that we stop you from importing a pool onto multiple machines (which would have lead to corruption). eric On May 30, 2

[zfs-discuss] zfs data recovery bug?

2007-06-04 Thread Roman Chervotkin
Hi guys, please help to clarify. Do usual postgresql pg_dump today and have got an error. - pg_dump: SQL command failed pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: compressed data is corrupt pg_dump: The command was: COPY public.candidates (id, name, surname, mid_name, compen

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-04 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi, I have been trying to setup a boot ZFS filesystem since b63 and found out about bug 6553537 that was preventing boot from ZFS filesystems starting from b63. First question is whether b65 has solved the problem as was planned on the bug page. Second question is: as I cannot boot successfully

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: shareiscsi is cool, but what about sharefc or sharescsi?

2007-06-04 Thread Brian Hechinger
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 06:37:21PM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > I'd love to be able to server zvols out as SCSI or FC > > targets. Are > > there any plans to add this to ZFS? That would be > > amazingly awesome. > > Can one use a spare SCSI or FC controller as if it were a target? Most

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slashdot Article: Does ZFS Obsolete Expensive NAS/SANs?

2007-06-04 Thread eric kustarz
On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toby Thain wrote: Sorry, I should have cited it. Blew my chance to moderate by posting to the thread :) http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=236627&cid=19319903 I computed the FUD factor by sorti

[zfs-discuss] Re: Deterioration with zfs performance and recent zfs bits?

2007-06-04 Thread Jürgen Keil
I wrote > Instead of compiling opensolaris for 4-6 hours, I've now used > the following find / grep test using on-2007-05-30 sources: > > 1st test using Nevada build 60: > > % cd /files/onnv-2007-05-30 > % repeat 10 /bin/time find usr/src/ -name "*.[hc]" -exec grep FooBar {} + This find + grep

Re: [zfs-discuss] A possible interim alternative to ZFS boot

2007-06-04 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harold Ancell wrote: > Those of us who don't want to be part of the "debug ZFS boot" effort > could very possibly get along for now by having a minimal toe hold in, > say, a SVM RAID-1 UFS / filesystem, and after that gets started, mount > as ZFS files

[zfs-discuss] Replacing a failed drive with ZFS

2007-06-04 Thread Stephen Person
DISCLAIMERS: ZFS bits on this server are old: # pkginfo -l SUNWzfsr |grep -i version VERSION: 11.11,REV=2006.01.03.01.17 OS is an old build of Nevada: SunOS 5.11 snv_31 Experts, I have what is hopefully a simple question. We have a ZFS pool (dilbert) consisting of 6 2

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS consistency guarantee

2007-06-04 Thread Darren Dunham
> > > Just curious,is there any manual way of telling ZFS > > to flush the > > > buffers after queiscing the db other than taking a > > ZFS snapshot?. > > > > If you're not taking a snapshot, why would you want > > ZFS to flush the > > buffers? > > > > Maybe just a way to confirm some really i

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Deterioration with zfs performance and recent zfs bits?

2007-06-04 Thread Jürgen Keil
> > Patching zfs_prefetch_disable = 1 has helped > It's my belief this mainly aids scanning metadata. my > testing with rsync and yours with find (and seen with > du & ; zpool iostat -v 1 ) pans this out.. > mainly tracked in bug 6437054 vdev_cache: wise up or die > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/

Re: [zfs-discuss] SMART

2007-06-04 Thread Marko Milisavljevic
You are right... I shouldn't post in the middle of the night... nForce chipsets don't support AHCI. On 6/4/07, J. David Beutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Marko Milisavljevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2007 02:03:56 AM: > I think nForce 430 would be using AHCI driver if you set you BIOS

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Send/RECV

2007-06-04 Thread Mark J Musante
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Ben Bressler wrote: > When I do the zfs send | ssh zfs recv part, the file system (folder) is > getting created, but none of the data that I have in my snapshot is > sent. I can browse on the source machine to view the snapshot data > pool/.zfs/snapshot/snap-name and I see the

[zfs-discuss] A possible interim alternative to ZFS boot

2007-06-04 Thread Harold Ancell
The following occurred to me as I'm in the process of debugging a SCSI boot problem (immediate reboot after I tell GRUB to "go" on a Tyan S2865 with a LSI Logic LSI20160B-F; every other possible use of the LSI board works.): While for the sake of simplicity and robustness we'd *like* everything to

[zfs-discuss] Re: /dev/random problem after moving to zfs boot:

2007-06-04 Thread Nicolas Linkert
*** # cryptoadm list -p Provider at user level: = /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pkcs11_kernel.so: All mechanisms are activated. /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pkcs11_softtoken.so: All mechanisms are activated. random is activated.

[zfs-discuss] Re: /dev/random problem after moving to zfs boot:

2007-06-04 Thread Nicolas Linkert
What about the /dev/random issue? Is there any way to fix this? I'd be delighted to name a provider with cryptoadm, but I have no clue at all how this works ... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@openso

Re: [zfs-discuss] SMART

2007-06-04 Thread J. David Beutel
"Marko Milisavljevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2007 02:03:56 AM: I think nForce 430 would be using AHCI driver if you set you BIOS for it, in current Nevada builds anyway, and I think that uses SATA framework. I don't see any BIOS option for AHCI, but when I get back in a couple week

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs and 2530 jbod

2007-06-04 Thread Louwtjie Burger
On 5/30/07, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Louwtjie Burger wrote: > I know the above mentioned kit (2530) is new, but has anybody tried a > direct attached SAS setup using zfs? (and the Sun SG-XPCIESAS-E-Z > card, 3Gb PCI-E SAS 8-Port Host Adapter, RoHS:Y - which is the > prefered