Just saw a message on xen-discuss that HVM is in the next version (b60-ish).
On 15/03/07, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet.
That would rule out windows for now.
You can run centOS zones on SXCR.
That just leaves freebsd (which hasn't got fan
It's possible (if unlikely) that you are only getting checksum errors on
metadata. Since ZFS always internally mirrors its metadata, even on
non-redundant pools, it can recover from metadata corruption which does not
affect all copies. (If there is only one LUN, the mirroring happens at
differe
Hi all.
A quick question about the checksum error detection routines in ZFS.
Surely ZFS can decide about checksum errors in a redundant environment but
what about an non-redundant one? We connected a single RAID5 array to a
v440 as a NFS server and while doing backups and the like we see the
"
Thanks for the links, but this is not really the kind of data I'm looking for.
These focus more on I/O. I need information on the memory cahing, and so on.
Specifically, I need data that shows how starting up a 10GB SGA database on a
16GB machine will not be able to flush the ZFS cache as quickl
On Mar 16, 2007, at 1:29 PM, JS wrote:
I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10
update 2 and 3) machines since the script came out (arc hogging is
a huge problem for me, esp on Oracle). This is probably a red
herring, but my v490 testbed seemed to actually cap on 3 s
Al Hopper wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating
I thought I'd share some lessons learned testing Oracle APS on Solaris 10 using
ZFS as backend storage. I just got done running 2 months worth of performance
tests on a v490 (32GB/4x1.8Ghz dual core proc system with 2xSun 2G HBAs on
separate fabrics) and varying how I managed storage. Storage us
> I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10 update
> 2 and 3) machines since the script came out (arc hogging is a huge
> problem for me, esp on Oracle). This is probably a red herring, but my
> v490 testbed seemed to actually cap on 3 separate tests, but my t2000
> testbed do
I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10 update 2 and 3)
machines since the script came out (arc hogging is a huge problem for me, esp
on Oracle). This is probably a red herring, but my v490 testbed seemed to
actually cap on 3 separate tests, but my t2000 testbed doesn't e
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
> > user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
> > keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
> >
I am wondering if it is possible (or whether it is a valid RFE) to support
file checksums on ZFS (e.g. in the extended file attributes). ZFS also has
block-level checksums - how complicated would it be to construct file-level
checksums from that?
These checksums may be used, for example, to qui
Hi Jiri,
>
> Currently the samba-3.0.25 will introduce the modular
> (.so) interface to plug the VFS modules handling the
> ACLs according the FS used.
Do you know - will the Samba/ZFS ACL be implemented in samba-3.0.26 ?
Thanks,
-- Leon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Overall ZFS/Database blogs:
http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/zfs_and_databases
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/zfs_and_oltp
Memory:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=82353𔆱
(There are more postings on ram.. just search the forum)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Greetings, all.
Does anyone have a good whitepaper or three on how ZFS uses memory and swap? I
did some Googling, but found nothing that was useful.
The reason I ask is that we have a small issue with some of our DBA's. We have
a server with 16GB of memory, and they are looking at moving over d
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating
and I'm wondering when it is coming.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:40:27PM +, Dick Davies wrote:
> I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet.
Not in any public release. It works in the internal bits.
dme.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolar
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
I'm wondering when it is coming.
Anything I can do to hel
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
I'm wondering when it is coming.
Anything I can do to help (mainly since I think
18 matches
Mail list logo
