[zfs-discuss] Question: Zpool replace on a disk which is getting errors

I have a large pool and I starting getting the following errors on one of the LUNS: Mar 13 17:52:36 gdo-node-2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (sd337): Mar 13 17:52:36 gdo-node-2 Error for Command: write(10) Error Level: Retryable Mar 13 17:52:36 gdo-node

Re: [zfs-discuss] nv59 + HA-ZFS

David Anderson wrote: ... My next step is to configure HA-ZFS for failover between the two ZFS nodes. Does Sun Cluster 3.2 work with SXCE? If so, are there any caveats for my situation? Has anyone been successful in developing a HA-ZFS environment without SC? I'd rather not go this route if p

[zfs-discuss] nv59 + HA-ZFS

Hi, I'm attempting to build a ZFS SAN with iSCSI+IPMP transport. I have two ZFS nodes that access iSCSI disks on the storage network and then the ZFS nodes share ZVOLs via iSCSI to my front-end Linux boxes. My throughput from one Linux box is about 170+MB/s with nv59 (earlier builds were abou

Re: [zfs-discuss] A little different look at filesystems ... Just looking for ideas

Ross, Gary (G.A.) wrote: What if something like the old CacheFS was revived, using ZFS as the base file system instead of UFS? Using the ZFS filesystems on servers as the "master" systems, the laptop builds a "cache" of files, used in the last month or so. If we ignore the "merging" problem for

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

I had thought about it, but from what I understand that limits the other VMs to Solaris. I have a few different administrators that are going to be running their own OSes (freebsd, linux, possibly windows), as well as some development ones (like jnode). From what I was able to find, that means th

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

> A little background... Awhile back, a FreeBSD server (running 7 domains) I > had running for 3 years (without reboot) got hacked into over Christmas > break. They wiped everything, including most of the logs. I was able to > determine that they got in from one of the user accounts. As you cou

[zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

A little background... Awhile back, a FreeBSD server (running 7 domains) I had running for 3 years (without reboot) got hacked into over Christmas break. They wiped everything, including most of the logs. I was able to determine that they got in from one of the user accounts. As you could prob

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Layout for multiple large streaming writes.

Tp the original poster, FYI, Accessing RAID drives at a constant "~70-75%" does not probably leave enough excess for degraded mode. A normal rule of thumb is 50 to 60% constant to allow excess capacity to be absorbed in degraded mode. An "

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Solaris as a VMWare guest

James Dickens wrote: On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: What issues, if any, are likely to surface with using Solaris inside vmware as a guest os, if I choose to use ZFS? works great in vmware server, I

Re: [zfs-discuss] Layout for multiple large streaming writes.

Thanks to everyone who replied to my question. Your input is very helpful. To clarify, I was concerned more with MTTDL than performance. With either of the 7+2 or 10+2 layouts, I am able to achieve far more throughput than is available to me via the network. Doing tests from memory on the s

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS info

A good starting point: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/ Rayson On 3/13/07, kanishk rastogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i wanted to know in detail about the zfs.Like its physical disk structure. If u can point me the links, i did be greatful. regards kanishk __

[zfs-discuss] ZFS info

hi all, i wanted to know in detail about the zfs.Like its physical disk structure. If u can point me the links, i did be greatful. regards kanishk ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-d