Thanks for the response, please see my comments below . . .
> It (hot-spare) should have kicked in. How long did you wait for it ?
10 to 15 minutes.
> Was there any IO happening on the pool ?
Not when I noticed the problem. I'm evaluating ZFS+NFS as a replacement for our
NetApp filers and d
They're really not comparable at all.
ZFS is a local on-disk file system.
PVFS2 is a parallel file system built on top of a file system local to each of
the nodes in a cluster with a lot of features for high-performance I/O.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
I have the P5M2, not the P5M2-M. It is a new board, not yet listed on Asus's
website. The P5M2 is a LGA775 socket (I have an Intel Pentium D processor).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Jason,
Depending on which hardware architecture you're working on, you may be
able to get Studio 11 compiled binaries through the CoolStack project:
http://cooltools.sunsource.net/coolstack/index.html
Regardless, optimized compiler flags for MySQL with Studio 11 are in the
source bundle l
Hi Martin,
Martin wrote:
I agree for non enterprise users the expansion of
raidz vdevs is a critical missing feature.
Now you've got me curious. I'm not trying to be inflammatory here, but how is
online expansion a non-enterprise feature? From my perspective, enterprise
users are the
Rob,
It (hot-spare) should have kicked in. How long did you wait for it ?
Was there any IO happening on the pool ? Try doing some IO to the disk
and see if it kicks in.
Also, another point to note is the size of the the hotspares. Please
ensure that the hot-spares
are of the same size as the
Jason,
Apologies.. I missed out this mail yesterday...
I am not too familiar with the options. Someoen else will have to answer
this.
Thanks and regards,
Sanjeev.
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Sanjeev,
Could you point me in the right direction as to how to convert the
following GCC compile
> So, does anyone know if I can run ZFS on my iPhone?
> ;-)
> -- richard
Hi Richard
Thanks for your interest in running ZFS, the final word in filesystems, on your
iPhone.
I'd be happy to help you. Please send the iPhone to me at the address provided
below and I shall get you going as fast a
> I agree for non enterprise users the expansion of
> raidz vdevs is a critical missing feature.
Now you've got me curious. I'm not trying to be inflammatory here, but how is
online expansion a non-enterprise feature? From my perspective, enterprise
users are the ones most likely to keep legac
Ah, vi does an fsync. So I suspect that this is bug:
6413510 zfs: writing to ZFS filesystem slows down fsync() on other files
in the same FS
Here's a snippet from the Evaluation:
---
ZFS keeps in list in memory of all transactions and will push *all*
of them out on a fsync.
I've some important information that should shed some light on this behavior:
This evening I created a new filesystem across the very same 50 disks including
the COMPRESS attribute. My goal was to isolate some workload to the new
filesystem and started moving a 100GB directory tree over to the n
this is more speculation that anything, but I would think that ZFS on my
iPod would be a more relevant question at this time, as ZFS will ship
with Leopard/Mac OS X 10.5, and the 1 Gb should be available for file
system cache.
Jerry
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Richard Elling wrote:
Hi Sanjeev,
Thank you! I was not able to find anything as useful on the subject as
that! We are running build 54 on an X4500, would I be correct in my
reading of that article that if I put "set zfs:zfs_arc_max =
0x1 #4GB" in my /etc/system, ZFS will consume no more than
4GB? Thank you in
I agree for non enterprise users the expansion of raidz vdevs is a critical
missing feature.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> I've tested a box running two Marvell based 8-port
> controllers (which has
> been running great on Update 2) on the solaris Update
> 3 beta without
> issues. The specific card is the newer version of
> the SuperMicro board:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/A
> oC-SAT2
>
> For future reference for someone looking to build a
> ZFS storage server, the server config I am now using
> is Solaris 10 U3, has two Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8
> controllers, 12 Seagate 750GB drives, 2 Seagate 160GB
> drives, and an Asus P5M2 motherboard (don't think
> these boards are yet for gen
Ok, I've been actively pouring through this discussion list reading everything
I can about ZFS mirroring and remote setups.
I have a feeling that on reading everyone's input, that ZFS is purely designed
to have "persistance" or "recovery" mirroring rather than "backup" mirroring.
There is no in
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Richard Elling wrote:
> So, does anyone know if I can run ZFS on my iPhone? ;-)
Sure--provided it has at least 1GB of RAM for the file system cache. :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http
So, does anyone know if I can run ZFS on my iPhone? ;-)
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
As an update, I found out that if I attempt a "zfs import -f -d ", it
errors with:
"no pools available to import"
If I try to force with the pool name itself, it complains that no such pool
exists.
Ian
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/09/2007 10:59:08 AM:
> I have a zfs filesystem exported via samba. I can connect to the
> filesystem over CIFS from a Windows box, but I get an access denied
> when I try to create a file. I can create the file just fine from
> the Solaris prompt as the same u
New tidbit of information...
I have a user account USER belonging to two groups GROUP1 and GROUP2. GROUP1
is the primary group.
If the ZFS folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP1, I can create the file through Samba.
If the folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP2, the create fails. This same problem
occurs w
I have a zfs filesystem exported via samba. I can connect to the filesystem
over CIFS from a Windows box, but I get an access denied when I try to create a
file. I can create the file just fine from the Solaris prompt as the same user
account. Does samba try to control permissions itself, or
Good morning.
I am interested in implementing a remote mirror with ZFS and iSCSI. I've gotten
the mirroring to work no problem (with a little bit of forcing), but I am
concerned about recovery if the mirror fails. If the mirror fails remotely
(I.E. the remote node goes down), no problem. I can
I'm using the Chenbro RM31212B. I highly recommend Chenbro rackmount chassis.
http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_01features.php?serno=33
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Understood. Two things, does the rename loop hit any of the fs in
> > question, and does putting a " sort -r | " before the while make any
> > difference?
>
>
> The reason I ask is because I had a similar issue running through batch
> renames (from epoch -> human) o
Hello Sunil,
Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 1:06:49 AM, you wrote:
SS> Hi,
SS> Are there any customer references available who have deployed ZFS in
SS> production?
SS> Thanks.
We've been using ZFS for over 2 years in a production.
Right now we've got over 100TB data on ZFS and we're still putting
[i]* Maximizing the use of different disk sizes[/i]
[i]If such capabilities exist, you could start with a single disk vdev and grow
it to consume a large disk farm with any number of parity drives, all while the
system is fully available.[/i]
Now you're just teasing me ;-)
This message post
We've been using ZFS for at least 3 months in a production environment. Not
only are we using the basic functionality but we use the snapshot/cloning
feature heavily along with Zones. We're running Solaris 10 Update 2 (aka 06/06)
version and are going to Update 3 shortly. Our diskspace is large
I'll see if I can confirm what you are suggesting. Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Naveen Nalam wrote:
> For future reference for someone looking to build a ZFS storage server,
> the server config I am now using is Solaris 10 U3, has two Supermicro
> AOC-SAT2-MV8 controllers, 12 Seagate 750GB drives, 2 Seagate 160GB
> drives, and an Asus P5M2 motherboard (don
Hello Anton,
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 6:29:29 AM, you wrote:
>> It's not about the checksum but about how a fs block is stored in
>> raid-z[12] case - it's spread out to all non-parity disks so in order
>> to read one fs block you have to read from all disks except parity
>> disks.
ABR> Howeve
Dennis Clarke writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Peter Schuller wrote:
> >> > http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine
> >>
> >> So just to confirm; disabling the zil *ONLY* breaks the semantics of
> >> fsync()
> >> and synchronous writes from the a
33 matches
Mail list logo
