Hi,
I've been using a ZFS pool inside a VMware'd NexentaOS, on a single real disk
partition, for a few months in order to store some backups.
Today I noticed that there were some directories missing inside 2 separate
filesystems, which I found strange. I went to the backup logs (also stored
in
Basically then wilth data being stored on the ZFS disks (no applications), and
web servers logs, it would benefit us more to have the 3 luns setup in one ZFS
Storage Pool?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-dis
Hello Casper,
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 6:40:31 PM, you wrote:
>>Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>>> Similarly, the bulk of the synchronous I/O done during the import of SMF
>>> manifests early in boot after an install or upgrade are wasted effort..
>>
>>I've done hundreds of installs. Empirically, my
> 1. Can I create ZFS volumes on a ZFS file system from one server,
> attach the file system read-write to a different server (to load data),
> then detach the file system from that server and attach the file system
> read-only to multiple other servers?
I don't think so today. Th
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Dave Burleson wrote:
> 1. Can I create ZFS volumes on a ZFS file system from one server,
> attach the file system read-write to a different server (to load data),
> then detach the file system from that server and attach the file system
> read-only to multiple oth
I will have a file system in a SAN using ZFS. Can someone answer my
questions?
1. Can I create ZFS volumes on a ZFS file system from one server,
attach the file system read-write to a different server (to load data),
then detach the file system from that server and attach the file syst
Hey Robert,
The iSCSI target is targetting Solaris 10 update 4. There wasn't any issue
with the target, rather it was the timing of the its integration into Nevada,
and the sheer quantity of projects targetting update 3.
Adam
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:39:17PM -0500, Robert Petkus wrote:
> Folks
Folks,
Just wondering why iSCSI target disk support didn't make it into the
latest Solaris release. Were there any problems?
Robert
--
Robert Petkus
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Physics Dept. - Bldg. 510A
http://www.bnl.gov/RHIC
http://www.acf.bnl.gov
__
>Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>> Similarly, the bulk of the synchronous I/O done during the import of SMF
>> manifests early in boot after an install or upgrade are wasted effort..
>
>I've done hundreds of installs. Empirically, my observation is that
>the SMF manifest import scales well with processor
Thanks Louwtjie and Darren.
On 12/14/06, storage-disk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I hope that I this is not the old thread.
I'd like to know how zfs get mounted. After a pool is created, zfs got
mounted? Where is the record? Which file got written?
Traditional /etc/vfstab will mount
Mike Byrne did a nice write-up on ztest at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/ztest
Bill Moore also discusses ztest in his blog at:
http://blogs.sun.com/bill/date/20051116
This is a "whitebox" test suite that is maintained by the ZFS developers,
and is in the ON source code base on op
Roch - PAE wrote:
Right on. And you might want to capture this in a blog for
reference. The permalink will be quite useful.
such as:
http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/zil_disable
?
We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
big user controlled transaction :
turn
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Similarly, the bulk of the synchronous I/O done during the import of SMF
manifests early in boot after an install or upgrade are wasted effort..
I've done hundreds of installs. Empirically, my observation is that
the SMF manifest import scales well with processors. In o
storage-disk wrote:
Hi all,
I hope that I this is not the old thread.
I'd like to know how zfs get mounted. After a pool is created, zfs got mounted?
Where is the record? Which file got written?
Traditional /etc/vfstab will mount all entries in that file. Where does Solaris
find zfs mount
Anton B. Rang wrote:
> The ZIL is a necessary part of ZFS. Just because the ZFS file structure will
> be consistent after a system crash even with the ZIL disabled does not mean
> that disabling it is safe!
Is there a list of battery-backed RAID controllers supported by Solaris x86
somewhere? Doe
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 11:33 +0100, Roch - PAE wrote:
> We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
> big user controlled transaction :
>
> turn zil off
> do tons of thing to the filesystem.
> big sync
> turn zil back on
Yep. The bulk of the "heavy lifting" o
Hi all,
I hope that I this is not the old thread.
I'd like to know how zfs get mounted. After a pool is created, zfs got mounted?
Where is the record? Which file got written?
Traditional /etc/vfstab will mount all entries in that file. Where does Solaris
find zfs mount at boot?
How to I tell
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:39:58PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> Jochen M. Kaiser wrote:
> >Didn't find any decent SAS controllers though, qlogic has some,
> >but the PCIe model with two external ports isn't supported on
> >Solaris. The single port model would work though...
>
> We (Sun) sell LSI
Hi there!
I want to build el cheapo ZFS NFS/Samba server for storing user files and NFS
mail
storage.
I'm planning to have one 0.5Tb SATA2 ZFS RAID10 pool with several filesystems:
1) 200 Gb filesystem with ~300K user files, shared with Samba, about 10
clients, very light load.
2) 15-20 Gb fil
Hello Jochen,
Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 10:35:22 PM, you wrote:
JMK> Robert,
>> It's not that bad with CPU usage.
>> For example with RAID-Z2 while doing scrub I get
>> something like
>> 800MB/s read from disks (550-600MB/s from zpool
>> iostat perspective)
>> and all four cores are mostly c
Right on. And you might want to capture this in a blog for
reference. The permalink will be quite useful.
We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
big user controlled transaction :
turn zil off
do tons of thing to the filesystem.
big sync
turn zil
21 matches
Mail list logo
