Hi all,
As inotify for Linux, is there same mechanism in Solaris for ZFS?
I think this functionality is helpful for desktop search engine.
I know one engineer of Sun is working on "file event monitor", which
will provide some information of file events, but is not for
search purpose because it m
For me, it came down to - Do I want to patch, or upgrade?
My gateway to the internet is a solaris 10 box, patched whenever
required. I like that as soon as a security patch is available, I can
apply it and reboot. Simple.
My laptop runs nevada. I upgrade from network / dvd when I see a new
featur
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:21, Richard Elling - PAE wrote:
> > One way to populate
> > an ABE is to mirror slices. However, you cannot mirror between a
> > device that starts at cylinder 0 and one that does not.
>
> Where is this restriction documented? It doesn't make sense to me.
> Maybe you h
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Jason King wrote:
Anxiously anticipating the ability to boot off zfs, I know there's
been some talk about leveraging some of the snapshotting/cloning
features in conjunction with upgrades and patches.
What I am really hoping for is the ability to clone /, patch the
clon
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 11/7/06, Richard Elling - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> d10 mirror of c0t2d0s0 and c0t3d0s0swap (2+2GB, to match above)
Also a waste, use a swap file. Add a dumpdev if you care about
kernel dumps, no need to mirror a dumpdev.
How do you figure that allocating
On 11/8/06, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my case, the ability to clone a zone from a zfs snapshot did'nt make
it! :(
Yeah, but if you read the man page in the U3 beta, you would see that
the man page changes made it over. Personally, I would have preferred
the code instead of the ma
> [ Hi Wes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
> And the smart-ask answer is:
>
> By Definition: the OpenSolaris/Solaris Express
> feature that is *your*
> "must-have" feature, probably won't be in Update 3!
> :)
>
Exactly, that's why I used quotes as I'm sure I'd be happy with S10u3, assuming
ignorance
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Wes Williams wrote:
[ reformatted ... ]
> I'm in the process of building a Solaris NFS server with ZFS and was
> wondering if any gurus here have any comments as to choosing the
> upcoming Solairs 10 11/06 [presumably] or OpenSolaris bXX/Solairs
> Express for this use. Ev
Jason King wrote:
Anxiously anticipating the ability to boot off zfs, I know there's been some
talk about leveraging some of the snapshotting/cloning features in conjunction
with upgrades and patches.
What I am really hoping for is the ability to clone /, patch the clone, then boot off the clo
I'm in the process of building a Solaris NFS server with ZFS and was wondering
if any gurus here have any comments as to choosing the upcoming Solairs 10
11/06 [presumably] or OpenSolaris bXX/Solairs Express for this use. Even with
my use of OpenSolaris I maintain a service contract to show my
Anxiously anticipating the ability to boot off zfs, I know there's been some
talk about leveraging some of the snapshotting/cloning features in conjunction
with upgrades and patches.
What I am really hoping for is the ability to clone /, patch the clone, then
boot off the clone (by doing a clon
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 5:31:28 PM, you wrote:
MA> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> PvdZ> This could be related to Linux trading reliability for speed by doing
>> PvdZ> async metadata updates.
>> PvdZ> If your system crashes before your metadata is flushed to disk your
>> PvdZ> fi
Robert Milkowski wrote:
PvdZ> This could be related to Linux trading reliability for speed by doing
PvdZ> async metadata updates.
PvdZ> If your system crashes before your metadata is flushed to disk your
PvdZ> filesystem might be hosed and a restore
PvdZ> from backups may be needed.
you can a
Robert Milkowski wrote On 11/08/06 08:16,:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 3:23:35 PM, you wrote:
PvdZ> On 7 Nov 2006, at 21:02, Michael Schuster wrote:
listman wrote:
hi, i found a comment comparing linux and solaris but wasn't sure
which version of solaris was being referred.
Paul van der Zwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure UFS and ZFS can be faster, but having fast, but possibly
> dangerous, defaults
> gives you nice benchmark figures ;-)
> In real life I prefer the safe, but a bit slower, defaults, as should
> anybody
> who values his data.
There is another p
On 8 Nov 2006, at 16:16, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 3:23:35 PM, you wrote:
PvdZ> On 7 Nov 2006, at 21:02, Michael Schuster wrote:
listman wrote:
hi, i found a comment comparing linux and solaris but wasn't sure
which version of solaris was being referr
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 3:23:35 PM, you wrote:
PvdZ> On 7 Nov 2006, at 21:02, Michael Schuster wrote:
>> listman wrote:
>>> hi, i found a comment comparing linux and solaris but wasn't sure
>>> which version of solaris was being referred. can the list confirm
>>> that this i
On 7 Nov 2006, at 21:02, Michael Schuster wrote:
listman wrote:
hi, i found a comment comparing linux and solaris but wasn't sure
which version of solaris was being referred. can the list confirm
that this issue isn't a problem with solaris10/zfs??
"Linux also supports asynchronous director
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 01:54 -0800, Erblichs wrote:
>
> Bill Sommerfield,
that's not how my name is spelled
>
> Are their any existing snaps?
no. why do you think this would matter?
>
> Can you have any scripts that may be
> removing aged files?
no; there was essentially no
Bill Sommerfield,
Are their any existing snaps?
Can you have any scripts that may be
removing aged files?
Mitchell Erblich
--
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>
> On a v40z running snv_51, I'm doing a "zpool replace z c1t4d0 c1t5d0".
>
> (so, w
20 matches
Mail list logo
