Frank Cusack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of
../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one existing
snapshot which, after getting the above error,
On August 31, 2006 4:00:52 PM -0700 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of ../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one e
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of ../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one existing
snapshot which, after getting the above error, I deleted successfully
No, there is no documentation for libzfs. Your only bet is to look at
the opensolaris source and see how its being used. It's a
consolidation-private library, so it's not intended for public use.
That being said, if you're willing to go through some growing pains on
upgrade/patch, you're welcome
Hi there...
I have solaris 5.10 update 2
I am trying get some iostats on a zpool, A little bit digging indicated thtat
I can do this by doing
libzfs_init and zpool_open and so on .. library calls.
But /lib/libzfs.so doesn't have the implementation of libzfs_int() , checked
with
/ucs/ccs/bin/nm
Sanjeev Bagewadi wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a cer
Ok, it's clear but doesn't give me any real solid ground. Maybe I tell more
about the hardware etc. It's a Sun X4200 running Solaris 10 X68 connecting
through fiberchannel to a StorageTek D280 RAID storage.
Maybe this makes the picture more complete.
Greets,
This message posted from opensol
John Beck wrote:
% zfs snapshot -r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% zfs send space/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh newbox zfs recv -d space
% zfs send space/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh newbox zfs recv -d space
...
% zfs set mountpoint=/export/home space
% zfs set mountpoint=/usr/local space/local
% zfs set sharenfs=on
Roch wrote:
Matthew Ahrens writes:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > IIRC unmounting ZFS file system won't flush its caches - you've got to
> > export entire pool.
>
> That's correct. And I did ensure that the data was not cached before
> each of my tests.
Matt ?
It seems to me that (at
Matthew Ahrens writes:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > Hello Richard,
> >
> > Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of
> > the
> > RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:54:25AM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Theo Bongers wrote:
> >Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a
> >RAID array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
> >How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of the
RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise, there
might
RLH> still be a fair bit of cached data left o
Theo Bongers wrote:
Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a RAID
array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I grow the filesystem
after LUN expansion.
Do I need to format/type/autoc
Thanks
Now, I don't have any worry to migrate to ZFS.
> > I have 3 drives.
> > The first one will be the primary/boot drive under
> UFS. The 2 others will become a mirrored pool with
> ZFS.
> > Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware
> or software), so all the data on my mirrored pool a
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:55:27PM +0100, Tim Foster wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> > snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> Nope, unfortunately not - you're interested in bug
> http://b
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files
(or S
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files (or
SB> rather the otherwa
Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a RAID
array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I grow the filesystem
after LUN expansion.
Do I need to format/type/autoconfigre/label on the s
Thanks guys for your help.
Of course I have already put the D1000 in split so I can test the ZFS
mirroring and so on
cheers
Alfredo
James C. McPherson wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of
On 8/31/06, Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nickus,
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> # rsync -arvn
>
> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go
Hi Nickus,
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> # rsync -arvn
>
> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole
> filesystem and compare files.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:53:20PM -0700, Stefan Johansson wrote:
> Yes I did and it works ok enough for me.
>
> Would be nice to have vmware server for Solaris instead so I can run Solaris
> as the host and use zfs directly on the controllers.
You're not the only one who wants that. Maybe we s
Hi everyone,
Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
# rsync -arvn
and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole
filesystem and compare files. It would be nice if zfs would have this
option builtin.
Regards,
Nick
James Dickens wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
If
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
If solaris see's the devi
Hi,
> I have 3 drives.
> The first one will be the primary/boot drive under UFS. The 2 others will
> become a mirrored pool with ZFS.
> Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware or software), so all the
> data on my mirrored pool are ok?
> How can I restore this pool? When I create the p
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
cheers
___
zfs-discuss mailing lis
Hi,
I'm a newbie at ZFS but I have some questions:
I have 3 drives.
The first one will be the primary/boot drive under UFS. The 2 others will
become a mirrored pool with ZFS.
Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware or software), so all the data
on my mirrored pool are ok?
How can I r
Hello Richard,
Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of the
RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise, there
might
RLH> still be a fair bit of cached data left over from the first test, w
29 matches
Mail list logo
