On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 16:29 -0700, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> Yeah; you need to be using a profile shell to get access to profile-enabled
> commands:
>
> $ zfs create pool/aux2
> cannot create 'pool/aux2': permission denied
> $ pfksh
> $ zfs create pool/aux2
> $ exit
> $
>
> Either set your shell
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:08:18PM -0500, James Dickens wrote:
> I think I have found a bug in ZFS profiles as defined in
> # uname -av
> SunOS enterprise 5.11 snv_39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
> #
>
> # usermod -P "ZFS File System Management" zfsadmin
>
> # su zfsadmin
>
> # zfs create pool2/te
I think I have found a bug in ZFS profiles as defined in
# uname -av
SunOS enterprise 5.11 snv_39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
#
# usermod -P "ZFS File System Management" zfsadmin
# su zfsadmin
# zfs create pool2/testzfsprofile
cannot create 'pool2/testzfsprofile': permission denied
# ppriv -De z
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Steve,
Thursday, June 29, 2006, 5:54:50 PM, you wrote:
SB> I've noticed another possible issue - each mount consumes about 45KB of
SB> memory - not an issue with tens or hundreds of filesystems, but going
SB> back to the 10,000 user scenario this would be 450MB of
>
> I just tried a quick test on Sol10u2:
> for x in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do for y in 0 1 2
> 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> zfs create testpool/$x$y; zfs set quota=1024k
> testpool/$x$y
>done; done
> ologies for the formatting - is there any way to
> preformat text on this forum?]
Remove the quota fr
Hello Steve,
Thursday, June 29, 2006, 5:54:50 PM, you wrote:
SB> I've noticed another possible issue - each mount consumes about 45KB of
SB> memory - not an issue with tens or hundreds of filesystems, but going
SB> back to the 10,000 user scenario this would be 450MB of memory. I know
SB> that mem
1) We installed ZFS onto our Solaris 10 T2000 3 months ago. I have been
told our ZFS code is downrev. What is the recommended way to upgrade ZFS
on a production system (we want minimum downtime)? Can it safely be
done without affecting our 3.5 million files?
2) We did not turn on compression
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded my machine at home to Solaris 10U2. As I already had a ZFS, I
wanted to migrate my home directories at once to a ZFS from a local UFS
metadisk. Copying and changing the config of the automounter succeeded without
any problems. But when I tried to
My latest blog details the steps needed to access your zfs root filesystem from
miniroot. It would probably be wise if you set this up before you need it :)
http://solaristhings.blogspot.com
Doug
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-dis
> There is no 40 filesystem limit. You most likely had a pre-existing
> file/directory in testpool of the same name of the filesystem
> you tried to create.
I'm absolutely sure that I didn't. This was a freshly created pool.
Having said that, I recreated the pool just now and tried again and
it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:30:25AM -0400, Jeff Victor wrote:
For example, if ZFS is mirroring a pool across two different storage arrays, a
firmware error in one of them will cause problems that ZFS will detect when
it tries to read the data. Further, ZFS would be able
Hi there.
I have a telco customer who has a home grown application which deals with
inter carrier sms. Basically all this application does is read an sms request
and write it to a queue.
However that's lots and lots of very small reads and writes.
They've done performance testing on a
Hello przemolicc,
Thursday, June 29, 2006, 10:08:23 AM, you wrote:
ppf> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello przemolicc,
>>
>> Thursday, June 29, 2006, 8:01:26 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> ppf> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:30:28PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> >>
Hi,
I just upgraded my machine at home to Solaris 10U2. As I already had a ZFS, I
wanted to migrate my home directories at once to a ZFS from a local UFS
metadisk. Copying and changing the config of the automounter succeeded without
any problems. But when I tried to login to JDS, login suceeded
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello przemolicc,
>
> Thursday, June 29, 2006, 8:01:26 AM, you wrote:
>
> ppf> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:30:28PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> >> ppf> What I wanted to point out is the Al's example: he wrote about
> >> damag
Hello przemolicc,
Thursday, June 29, 2006, 8:01:26 AM, you wrote:
ppf> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:30:28PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> ppf> What I wanted to point out is the Al's example: he wrote about damaged
>> data. Data
>> ppf> were damaged by firmware _not_ disk surface ! In such case
Hello Philip,
Thursday, June 29, 2006, 2:58:41 AM, you wrote:
PB> Erik Trimble wrote:
>>
>> Since the best way to get this is to use a Mirror or RAIDZ vdev, I'm
>> assuming that the proper way to get benefits from both ZFS and HW RAID
>> is the following:
>>
>> (1) ZFS mirror of HW stripes,
17 matches
Mail list logo
