Re: [zfs-discuss] Bandwidth disparity between NFS and ZFS

2006-06-24 Thread Chris Csanady
On 6/24/06, Neil Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The data will be written twice on ZFS using NFS. This is because NFS on closing the file internally uses fsync to cause the writes to be committed. This causes the ZIL to immediately write the data to the intent log. Later the data is also writt

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Extended metadata?

2006-06-24 Thread Shawn Walker
> > Well, I think that's the first time that I've been > > accused of being "detail lite [sic]"... Indeed, > it's > > amazing to me that anyone could read > > all of the content that I pointed to and not be > > _overwhelmed_ with detail. > > Really? Perhaps we are looking for different things. >

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS on 32bit x86

2006-06-24 Thread Shawn Walker
> Erik Trimble wrote: > This is an @opensolaris.org alias it is about working > together as a > community and identifying problems and discovering > solutions. I don't > think it is at all appropriate to bring up Sun > business choices here. > Where that is appropriate is when Sun employees nee

Re: [zfs-discuss] Bandwidth disparity between NFS and ZFS

2006-06-24 Thread Neil Perrin
Chris, The data will be written twice on ZFS using NFS. This is because NFS on closing the file internally uses fsync to cause the writes to be committed. This causes the ZIL to immediately write the data to the intent log. Later the data is also written committed as part of the pools transaction