Hey,
thanks ;)
although it seems after a reboot things are sorted ;)
Patrick
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're missing some of the daemons:
daemon 337 1 0 11:41:03 ? 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpcbind
daemon 469 1 0 11:41:04 ? 0:00
Well, aftr reboot I destroyed snapshots in nfs-s5-s8 and now system is working
ok without effects desribed before (at least so far).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensol
System was booting over 30 minutes (it was staying hust after checkign for ufs
was done) - I can see on the array that disks in pool nfs-s5-s8 are blinking -
I guess it was hanging during zfs import/mount.
It was reported during ZFS beta and was supposed to be fixed - looks like it's
not.
T
Robert Milkowski wrote:
> I issued svcadm disable nfs/server
> nfsd is still there with about 1300 threads (down from 2052).
> stack pointer for thread 3002f4bd300: 2a1084b7021
> [ 02a1084b7021 cv_wait+0x40() ]
> 02a1084b70d1 exitlwps+0x11c(0, 20, 4202, 300116ec7e0, 10,
> 3
Daniel Rock wrote:
> Sean Meighan schrieb:
>
>> The box runs less than 20% load. Everything has been working perfectly
>> until two days ago, now it can take 10 minutes to exit from vi. The
>> following truss shows that the 3 line file that is sitting on the ZFS
>> volume (/archives) took almost 1
It's not only when I try to stop nfsd - during normall operations I see that
one CPU has 0% idle, all traffic is only to one pool (and this is very small
traffic) and all nfs threads hung - I guess all these threads are to this pool.
bash-3.00# zpool iostat 1
capacity operatio
Hi.
All filesystems have compression set to off.
bash-3.00# zfs list -o compression|grep -i on
bash-3.00#
But still lzjb_compress() is ised by ZFS - is it for metadata or what?
bash-3.00# dtrace -n fbt::lzjb_compress:entry'[EMAIL PROTECTED]()]=count();}'
dtrace: description 'fbt::lzjb_compr
I issued svcadm disable nfs/server
nfsd is still there with about 1300 threads (down from 2052).
mpstat show at least on CPU with 0% idle all the time and:
bash-3.00# dtrace -n fbt:::entry'{self->vt=vtimestamp;}' -n
fbt:::return'/self->vt/[EMAIL PROTECTED](vtimestamp-self->vt);self->vt=0;}' -n
Hi.
snv_39, SPARC.
I have several pools (no protection on ZFS) with several filesystems inside
each pool.
Data are served by nfsd (over 3000 active threads).
Last time I changed it /etc/system:
set rpcmod:cotsmaxdupreqs=8192
set rpcmod:maxdupreqs=8192
And now I observer that every few hou
Hi,
is anyone working on ZFS ACL support in Samba?
Currently I have to disable ACL support in samba. Otherwise I get
"permission denied" error messages trying to synchronize my offline folders
residing on a Samba server (now on ZFS).
Daniel
___
zf
Sean Meighan schrieb:
The box runs less than 20% load. Everything has been working perfectly
until two days ago, now it can take 10 minutes to exit from vi. The
following truss shows that the 3 line file that is sitting on the ZFS
volume (/archives) took almost 15 minutes in fdsync.
/me have
Sean Meighan wrote:
Hi all; i just joined the group. My team has created a tool to watch
Solaris,Linux,Windows. It is non-root on both the client and the server. We
currently are using it to watch the 750 Sun Ray servers inside of sun. The basic
thing it does is executes a 55 command shell scr
Sean Meighan wrote:
... Everything has been working perfectly until two days ago, now it
can take 10 minutes to exit from vi. The following truss shows that
the 3 line file that is sitting on the ZFS volume (/archives) took
almost 15 minutes in fdsync. For those of you inside of Sun you can
s
13 matches
Mail list logo
