I would normally agree, just that I get very large block sizes in the
non-NFS scenario.
However, for completeness, you'll see my standard settings allow for
pretty large transfers. The maxreceivedataseglen below is the default,
and increasing it may help, but it still doesn't answer why the local
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:48:00PM -0700, Joe Little wrote:
> Here's some sample output. Where the I write over NFS to ZFS (no
> iscsi) I get high sizes for i/o:
>
> In the iscsi-backed case, I get:
[small block sizes]
> Looks to me the bulk of my problem is poor block size scheduling. Is
> this
> A couple of questions:
> - Do you think that zfs (and other subsystems) should
> use the ISO8601 time
> formatting standards?
>
> Regards,
>
> Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX.
I wish that were the only time standard!
No matter what country you live in, the ISO 8601 time/date sta
