Re: [yocto] [RFC] Blubber, a tool to set up yocto/poky projects easily

2014-03-10 Thread Vali Cobelea
Hi Josef, Looks ok at a first look, but my first suggestion would be to start using the "is" operator instead of "==" when it comes to comparing strings. Otherwise using your way with "==" will crash if any of the variables (those "sys.argv[]") are None (void). Best regards, Vali On 03/10/

Re: [yocto] [RFC] Blubber, a tool to set up yocto/poky projects easily

2014-03-10 Thread Vali Cobelea
be to have more safety and less crashes when one of the arguments, in your case, is empty (eg None). This discussion can go over and over, is more a flavor thing: being pythonian or not. Best regards, Vali On 03/10/2014 01:11 PM, Josef Holzmayr wrote: Hello Vali, Vali Cobelea hat am 10. März

[yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-08 Thread Vali Cobelea
Hi, Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project. For this we started the work on a dedicated layer called 'meta-cgl' which can be accessed / cloned from here: http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git git clone g...@git.

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-08 Thread Vali Cobelea
Hi, It should work as I tried it outside the company network; otherwise I'll ping back the IT guys to allow anonymous access. Sorry for any inconvenience, Vali On 04/08/2014 06:38 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vali Cobelea mailto:valentin.cobe...@ene

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-08 Thread Vali Cobelea
, Chris Larson wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vali Cobelea mailto:valentin.cobe...@enea.com>> wrote: Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project. For this we started the work on a dedicated layer called

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-09 Thread Vali Cobelea
make it easier to find, access and use for anyone, exactly as you suggested. Best regards, Vali On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Vali, On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote: Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL compliance when it

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-09 Thread Vali Cobelea
yer state. Much appreciated, Vali On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote: On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote: Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regardi

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-11 Thread Vali Cobelea
for Yocto. I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible. One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on? Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro sent from mobile. On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" <mailto:valentin.cobe...@enea.com>> wrote: OK Paul, that indeed makes

Re: [yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

2014-04-11 Thread Vali Cobelea
Hi, Thank you for your kind words. On 04/11/2014 05:20 AM, João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas wrote: Hi Vali, I took a look into meta-cgl and I've builded with all master (lots of warning) layers described in README file. Good initiative. The warnings will be addressed in the upcoming change