M=vt100, I get
F1-F5 working, but unfortunately, I need F10 as well.
So the terminal that matchbox-terminal emulates is neither a VT100 nor a
VT220 (or the superset it claims to be: xterm), but a confused mix of
the two.
Is there some setting to change this behaviour or is this a bug?
Regards,
applications don't seem to recognise F1-F5.
Regards,
--
Stuart Longland
Contractor
_ ___
\ /|_) | T: +61 7 3535 9619
\/ | \ | 38b Douglas StreetF: +61 7 3535 9699
SYSTEMSMilton QLD 4064 http://www.vrt.com.au
--
___
On 28/03/14 05:57, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Hi Ross,
> On 27/03/14 22:27, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> Can you paste the output of cat to confirm the values you're seeing?
>> The xterm guide says VT100 for F1-F4 (as VT100 doesn't define F5
>> onwards) and VT220 for F5-F
-gnueabi`?
Building a full cross-compiling is a royal PITA, been there more than
once and usually I stop at building a bare-bones C compiler as I find
doing a C library maddening.
In this case, the Yocto (OpenEmbedded?) build scripts have done all the
hard work for you.
--
Stuart Lon
