[yocto] *** NOTICE: bugzilla.yoctoproject.org scheduled maintenance ***

2011-01-21 Thread Saul Wold
provide improved functionality to site users and service will be restored as soon as possible. Thank you, The Yocto Team -- Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Build System ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] *** NOTICE: bugzilla.yoctoproject.org scheduled maintenance ***

2011-01-23 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/21/2011 10:42 AM, Saul Wold wrote: All, The site/application http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org will be offline, temporarily, for maintenance on 01/21/2011 at 4:00PM PST. Please do not attempt to use the site during this time period as the application and its data will be completely offline

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/1] perf: hard-code NO_LIBPERL/NO_LIBPYTHO

2011-01-25 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/25/2011 07:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: We already had this fix in the 2.6.37 kernel (and it is staged temporarily there) so this is the same change for the -stable kernel to fix the perf build error reported by Gary this morning. I went ahead and merged this to the kernel tree directly, s

[yocto] Volunteer for setting up a Debian 6 / Squeeze Machine

2011-01-26 Thread Saul Wold
Folks, especially regular contributors: Are they are any volunteers willing to setup a Debian 6 machine and build Poky / Yocto to determine if we have any problems. Since we will release 1.0 right around the time that developers maybe be working on Debian 6, we want to ensure we have tested a

[yocto] Bugzilla has returned - Bug Triage Plans

2011-01-27 Thread Saul Wold
n order to facilitate some semblance of order. You can also send email or place a bugzilla comment directly for those bugs that are important to you or your project. Thanks for your support of the Yocto Project -- Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Bu

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto/stable: beagle and crownbay updates

2011-01-27 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/21/2011 10:23 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Just a couple of SRCREV updates to bring in new kernel configs for the crownbay and some functionality (cherry picked from mainline) for the Beagle. Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git Branch: zedd/kernel Browse: h

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto/stable: update beagleboard part 2

2011-01-27 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/21/2011 12:23 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Just another quick update to pickup a change that gets beagleboard xm networking functional. Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git Branch: zedd/kernel Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zed

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto: update SRCREVs for emenlow

2011-01-27 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/24/2011 01:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: The emenlow has been ported/tested on 2.6.37. Updating the SRCREVs to reflect the change. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --gi

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2011-01-27 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/24/2011 01:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Saul/Richard, I'm batching two changes that I've been testing together. The first is explained by the patch itself, but basically it allows us to map multiple BSPs onto a single branch for building. There's no impact to existing BSPs, but as we go f

Re: [yocto] Kernel QA build error

2011-01-28 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/28/2011 12:31 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: I'm getting a QA failure when running a build from a recent git master: Checking autotools environment for common misconfiguration NOTE: Checking autotools environment for common misconfiguration linux: Recipe file does not have license file information

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: BSP updates

2011-02-03 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/02/2011 09:11 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Here's the update for the sugarbay and beagleboard BSPs. To make the sugarbay inhert common-pc-64 generic config/changes/fixes it has been branched in the kernel as yocto/standard/common-pc-64/sugarbar, as a result, we'll bump the commo

Re: [yocto] [poky] meta-toolchain build failed on fetch

2011-02-03 Thread Saul Wold
Richard: I am seeing a slightly different failure with master: NOTE: Running task 551 of 9061 (ID: 8270, /intel/poky/distro/meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb, do_fetch) NOTE: Running task 1245 of 9061 (ID: 8016, /intel/poky/distro/meta/recipes-kernel/lin

Re: [yocto] [poky] meta-toolchain build failed on fetch

2011-02-04 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/04/2011 06:16 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-02-04 12:20 AM, Zhang, Jessica wrote: Has anyone run into the following failure, this is for meta-toolchain for x86_64: This is lurking in various forms at the moment, the fetcher updates + new branches and the mirrors with old copies (my gue

Re: [yocto] [poky] meta-toolchain build failed on fetch

2011-02-04 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/04/2011 08:43 AM, Zhang, Jessica wrote: Wold, Saul wrote: On 02/04/2011 06:16 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-02-04 12:20 AM, Zhang, Jessica wrote: Has anyone run into the following failure, this is for meta-toolchain for x86_64: This is lurking in various forms at the moment, the fetc

Re: [yocto] Specifying license files

2011-02-17 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/17/2011 12:57 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: I'm trying to create a recipe to build libSDL, but I can't get the licensing working. My .bb file contains: LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=27818cd7fd83877a8e3ef82b82798ef4" This is correct if the md5sum of COPYING is matchi

Re: [yocto] [REVISED PATCH 0/1] Removal of emenlow from poky core

2011-02-25 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/24/2011 05:12 PM, Elizabeth Flanagan wrote: Removing Emenlow from core as it is a BSP layer and should be built as such. Revised to correct LCONF_VERSION (now 4) and LAYER_CONF_VERSION (now, also 4) Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git Branch: eflanagan/emenlow Browse:

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: add crowbay BSP

2011-02-25 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/25/2011 07:32 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, This adds the crownbay BSP infrastructure to the 2.6.37 kernel. The BSP branch has already been pushed and this adds the config data. TomZ will use this for a baseline and for further testing, so for now the change is harmless to any e

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: add crownbay BSP infrastructure

2011-02-26 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/25/2011 07:32 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Updating the meta SRCREV to grab this linux-yocto commit: meta: add crownbay BSP infrastructure Import the 2.6.34 crownbay infrastructure and update for the 2.6.37 kernel. This also brings in the feature/drm-emgd that the crownba

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH 0/1] u-boot: don't install host mkimage on non-native builds

2011-03-01 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/01/2011 09:49 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richar/Saul, This fixes BUG 777. The u-boot package clearly uses HOST_CC and HOST_STRIP to build mkimage, so installing it into ${D}${bindir} for anything but the native mkimage is a bad idea. The native recipe has its own install function, so we ca

Re: [yocto] Could you help to have a look at BUG 660

2011-03-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/02/2011 05:43 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: Hi Richard and Saul, Could you help to have a review of BUG 660? http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660 BUG 660 is about missing kernel firmware in poky-image-minimal. As from most of the machine configuration files in current poky, inclu

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/5][PULL] meta-xilinx powerpc bsp

2011-03-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/01/2011 02:30 PM, Adrian Alonso wrote: Several fixes for meta-xilinx powerpc bsp support Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/meta-xilinx.git Branch: powerpc-support Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/meta-xilinx/log/?h=powerpc-support Thanks, Adrian Alonso --- Adrian Alo

Re: [yocto] How to compile Qt library with bitbake?

2011-03-31 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/30/2011 11:52 PM, Li, Simon wrote: To whom may concern, Since Qt library is not existed in the default build configuration, I have to port it by myself. Is there any plan to compile Qt in the Yocto? I cannot find Qt with zypper as well. Simon, Qt4 is part of the yocto meta data. The p

Re: [yocto] How to compile Qt library with bitbake?

2011-04-01 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/31/2011 11:15 PM, Li, Simon wrote: Hi, Saul, Thanks for your reply. However, I got error messages as below: It seems not support "poky-image-sato-sdk" Simon for 0.9 version then it would be poky-image-sdk, we changed the image name in 1.0. Sorry for the confusion. Sau! ===

[yocto] Patch Comments and Upstream-Status

2011-04-05 Thread Saul Wold
tream patch submissions. Wiki Page: http://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Best_Known_Methods_%28BKMs%29_for_Package_Updating#Patch_Comments Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions to improve this process. Thanks Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project /

[yocto] Recipe maintainer-ship and distro_tracking_fields.inc

2011-04-08 Thread Saul Wold
to re-assign the recipe, so the recipe does not become stale. http://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Distro_Tracking -- Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Build System ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

[yocto] meta-intel has been split into meta-dpdk and meta-intel-qat

2017-09-27 Thread Saul Wold
In an effort to create more consistency in Yocto Project layer, we are splitting the meta-intel to remove some application/libraries that should really be in their own layers. The new meta-dpdk will serve as a place for the Linux Foundation's DPDK project to host meta-data. The meta-intel-qat

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel] meta-intel has been split into meta-dpdk and meta-intel-qat

2017-09-27 Thread Saul Wold
DPDK and QAT are specificly breaking out software middleware that might not be needed for all meta-intel MACHINES. Sau! > 2017-09-28 11:27 GMT+08:00 Saul Wold : > > In an effort to create more consistency in Yocto Project layer, we > > are > > splitting the meta-intel to

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW51

2016-12-12 Thread Saul Wold
Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 -> M2 Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 (TODAY!!) YP 2.3 M2 by Jan 23, 2017 SWAT team rotation: Tracy -> Alejandro https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: * Today is the M1 feature free

[yocto] Deprecating hddimg/isoimg

2016-12-20 Thread Saul Wold
Folks, For years we have wanted to get rid of the hddimg/iso type, we now have the WIC tool integrated into OE-Core such that we can build properly partitioned disk images. Historically the hddimg was a single FAT filesystem that contained boot-loader, the kernel and a rootfs.img file for bootin

[yocto] [meta-qt4 0/2] Update LIC_FILES_CKHSUMs

2017-02-28 Thread Saul Wold
The following two recipes use the OE-Core License file in additional to the COPYING.MIT, these are really purely MIT so don't use the OE-Core LICENSE file. This was discovered when a clarification statement was added to the OE-Core LICENSE file. Sau! Saul Wold (2): qt-demo-init: LICEN

[yocto] [meta-qt4 1/2] qt-demo-init: LICENSE is straight MIT so just use COPYING.MIT

2017-02-28 Thread Saul Wold
The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum file for a purely MIT licensed package. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- recipes-qt4/qt-demo/qt-demo-init_0.1.bb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-qt4/qt-demo/qt-demo-init_0.1.bb b

[yocto] [meta-qt4 2/2] qt4e-demo-image: LICENSE is straight MIT so just use COPYING.MIT

2017-02-28 Thread Saul Wold
The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum file for a purely MIT licensed package. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- recipes-qt4/images/qt4e-demo-image.bb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-qt4/images/qt4e-demo-image.bb b

[yocto] [PATCH] i386 machine.cfg: Explicitly disable 64BIT

2017-03-30 Thread Saul Wold
repo [YOCTO #11230] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- .../substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/i386/recipes-kernel/linux/files/machine.cfg b/scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] i386 machine.cfg: Explicitly disable 64BIT

2017-03-30 Thread Saul Wold
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 11:14 -0600, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > > > Since we do not set the 64 bit flags, newer kernels seem to build > > 64bit > > config files by default. This is due to a hard-coded uname -m che

<    1   2   3   4