On 12-11-20 10:09 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote:
Poky allows to build custom Linux for you, but we have cases where the post
build customization is required, like user-addition, network configuration,
service control. Even selecting the required packages can be a post build
activity.
The
On 12-11-21 11:29 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote:
Reply inline
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:53 PM
To: Venkata ramana gollamudi
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark
Subject: Re
On 12-11-27 05:23 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
I started looking at Yocto 2 weeks back. Despite the complexity in
kernel building, I found it quite hard to locate information on
preempt-rt build. I was trying to build linux-yocto-rt for beagleboard
from "danny" and the linux-yocto-3.4 kernel, and it seems t
On 12-11-28 01:07 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for commenting :-)
You shouldn't have needed to do this part, since the board already has
a preempt-rt BSP description:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/__cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.4/__tree/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/__bsp/beagleboard/b
On 12-11-28 01:07 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for commenting :-)
You shouldn't have needed to do this part, since the board already has
a preempt-rt BSP description:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/__cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.4/__tree/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/__bsp/beagleboard/b
On 12-11-30 03:21 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Thu 29 Nov 2012 18:59:18 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió:
Hi! First of all, I don't know if this is the correct mailing list to write
this. If it is not, please point me to th right one. Thanks!
I have found that t
On 12-12-03 02:06 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke
Initial checkin for the Rangeley 32-bit Machine
branch. This machine is based on the Avoton SoC
with nCPM.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
---
.../bsp/rangeley32/rangeley32-preempt-rt.scc | 18 +++
...
On 12-12-05 09:42 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Andreas Schweigstill
wrote:
I have also tried to build a kernel and root filesystem for Zynq but the kernel
gets stuck when booting, regardless if on the ZC702 board or on Qemu. I tried
Poky denzil and Poky danny.
Als
On 12-12-05 01:09 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Some candid feedback from someone struggling with their build. They
specified a non-master branch on the SRC_URI but had not added a
KBRANCH, so bitbake fetched everything, but do_kernel_checkout checked
out the master branch.
This sort of disconnect betw
On 12-12-05 01:15 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/05/2012 06:46 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-12-05 09:42 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Andreas Schweigstill
wrote:
I have also tried to build a kernel and root filesystem for Zynq but
the kernel
gets stuck when
On 12-12-04 01:11 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke
Hi,
Resending the patch for enabling the 32-bit support for
rangeley machine by resuing the existing rangeley branch.
Please pull them into linux-yocto-3.4/meta.
merged and pushed.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
The foll
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2012, at 00:11, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to have more than one bbappend applied to a recipe?
>>
>> I'm using meta-cedartrail with my own layer (which is set as lower
>
On 12-12-09 5:48 AM, Chris Tapp wrote:
On 9 Dec 2012, at 04:47, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Chris Tapp mailto:opensou...@keylevel.com>> wrote:
On 9 Dec 2012, at 00:11, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Chris Tapp
mailto:o
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> I was used to work with oe-classic.
> When I used oe-classic, often I used the 'devshell' option to try to
> compile (make uImage) the kernel with the entire environment set up
> correctly.
> Now if I do the same procedure with Yocto 8 Danny
On 12-12-11 06:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
In response to much feedback on the linux-yocto recipes and the associated
kernel tools, we have made a number of improvements in an attempt to
make them
more accessible. In particular, the tools now allow for using your own
sources
and configurations in a
On 12-12-13 5:51 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-12-13 14:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, David Nyström wrote:
Hi,
Hmm,
This will lead to these variables beeing append:able but
non-overridable in image layer, as an(un?)intended consequence,
right ?
Br,
David
Sent from my And
On 12-12-18 10:45 AM, Marco C. wrote:
2012/12/9 Bruce Ashfield :
As Chris said, this way should still work, and it does work here for me.
There's
one thing that you may notice with kernel's that have split source/build
dirs
(like linux-yocto), is that once you have gone through the
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some stuff and
> ran across this in "updateme":
>
> split_command_line_objects() {
> command_line_values=$@
>
> for v in $command_line_values; do
> v_base
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lai Eddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m using yocto 1.3 (poky-8.0) with jasperforest BSP,
> sometimes “bitbake core-image-minimal” did create files in
> /tmp/work/xxx-poky-linux/linux-yocto-xxx/linux-xxx-standard-build , but
> always create new image in /tmp/deploy/image fo
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
>
>>
>> poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some stuff and
>> ran across this in "up
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Rick Yang wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use
> yocto-kernel-tools to manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the
> old method. So we want to know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to
> manage the kernel
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
> kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for "local
> kern-tools work".
>
> is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
> kern-tools-native, and that bbappend a
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> as i celebrate christmas by clawing my way thru the code, i run
> across pedantic nitpickery like this:
>
I'm pretty sure if you dig in your email archives, you'll see me asking you
to
cc' me directly on anything linux-yocto or kern-t
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> > I'm pretty sure if you dig in your email archives, you'll see me
> > asking you to cc' me directly on anything linux-yocto or kern-tools,
> > since
On 12-12-24 02:59 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
Hi,
Catching up on email from the holidays. Did you ever get an answer
to this ?
I'm a yocto mostly-newbie, trying to find my way. I have a custom layer
that I am using to build a kernel. The layer right now consists of a few
kernel patches and a d
On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-12-24 02:59 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
> Catching up on email from the holidays. Did you ever get an answer
> to this ?
Not yet, resumed my quest today.
>
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
> On 1/2/2013 1:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>> On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/2/2013 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> > On 12-12-24 02:59 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
>>&
thing.
Bruce
Brian
On 1/2/2013 2:15 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Brian Smucker mailto:b...@bsmucker.eu.org>> wrote:
On 1/2/2013 1:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:06 AM, Bruce As
On 13-01-15 12:54 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
Thank you for directing me toward that documentation. As it happens, I
have already read that, and it doesn't apply.
The section you mentioned begins with this text:
While it is always preferable to work with sources integrated into
the Linux
On 13-01-15 12:59 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Brian Lloyd mailto:bll...@familyhonor.net>>
wrote:
The kernel is a special case, where the SDK is really designed for
developing user applications (which the kernel is not).
Yes, it's clear to me that, in this one re
On 13-01-15 01:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-15 12:54 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
Thank you for directing me toward that documentation. As it happens, I
have already read that, and it doesn't apply.
There are ways to do this,
On 13-01-22 03:28 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 01/15/2013 10:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
I finally found the entries that I was recalling earlier. They are:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241
https
On 13-01-21 06:19 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have created a branch for emgd-1.16 kernel driver for the v3.4
kernel repo over here.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib/log/?h=nitin/emgd-1.16
It consists of mainly following 2 commits on top of the s
On 13-01-22 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
Here is a commit which adds an scc file for emgd-1.16 feature. It
depends on the emgd-1.16 branch in the kernel repo, for which a pull
request is already sent.
This commit keeps the emgd-1.14 driver support in the repo
On 13-01-21 06:19 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have created a branch for emgd-1.16 kernel driver for the v3.4
kernel repo over here.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib/log/?h=nitin/emgd-1.16
It consists of mainly following 2 commits on top of the s
On 13-01-22 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
Here is a commit which adds an scc file for emgd-1.16 feature. It
depends on the emgd-1.16 branch in the kernel repo, for which a pull
request is already sent.
This commit keeps the emgd-1.14 driver support in the repo
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-22 03:28 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
One problem I ran into … When I tried to execute "make scripts," I got a whole bunch of
config questions that I *think* should have been answe
On 13-01-23 12:14 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
If I just hold down the "Enter" key, I believe all the defaults are taken, and
I eventually *do* get hostprogs that execute, but I don't
On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:14 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
If I just hold down the "Enter" key, I b
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan <
daniel.kenji.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm still fairly new to Yocto, and having some trouble with kernel
> packaging taking an extremely long time.
> I will try and keep details as simple as possible to explain my situation.
>
> I
On 13-01-24 02:58 PM, John Mehaffey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Patrick Turley
mailto:patricktur...@gamestop.com>> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>>
wrote:
> On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patri
Hi all,
We now have a more up to date kernel repository for contributions to
the linux-yocto kernel or linux-yocto meta data (configs, patches).
(Michael indulged me and help set this up really quickly, so he gets
all the credit for the work on this).
Enough rambling, and onto the link:
git:
On 13-01-28 12:47 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if SRC_URI has some limitations as to where it will be
expanded.
I have a bsp with 2 kernel recipes. One for mainline, the other for the
yocto kernel.
The kernel may be used with some middleware that requires some furth
On 13-01-28 01:34 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote on 28/01/2013
18:01:57:
[snip]
I suspect the kernel fragment issue is down to the fact that a yocto
kernel recipe is not being used,
i.e. it relies on the yocto kernel meta data mechanism?
I can confirm this part
On 13-01-28 01:35 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-01-28 01:34 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote on 28/01/2013
18:01:57:
[snip]
I suspect the kernel fragment issue is down to the fact that a yocto
kernel recipe is not being used,
i.e. it relies on the yocto kernel
On 13-01-29 06:24 AM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote on 28/01/2013
18:56:02:
Why is the SRC_URI containing the additional patches applied when
referenced directly in the bb file,
but not when referenced in an include or scc file?
Keeping the question isolated to
On 13-01-28 11:16 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan wrote:
Sorry to bring up an old post, but I haven't managed to find information in the
mail archives and bugzilla on how the issue stands as of today.
The post I am referring to is as follows:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-December
On 13-01-23 10:17 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:14 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Bruce Ashfield
On 13-02-01 7:48 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-23 10:17 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield
On 13-02-01 11:35 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
While, I'm not an expert, I would like to point out:
http://kernel.org/doc/index-old.html (the new index references this but
the information isn't on the new index page directly).
One thing mentioned is that a make distclean is required for reasonable
res
ays, I don't usually have
problems where I can't run the cross compiled tools, so my personal
recent experience is limited as well as bad parameters issues from using
the wrong compiler (as my compiler can generally make for both).
Brian
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 23:48 -0500, Bruce Ashfie
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote:
> I apologize if that has been brought up before.
>
> The linux-yocto kernel recipes include the git tags into PV by explicitly
> setting:
>
> PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}"
>
> This means that you cannot for example do
>
> bitbake linux-yo
same issue as linux-yocto.
Cheers,
Bruce
version. Using -b with the recipe file name is not an option since you
would not get the bbappends.
Cheers,
Rudi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Rudolf St
On 13-02-08 6:18 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke
Hi,
This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
Please pull into linux-y
On 13-02-12 6:47 PM, David Mulder wrote:
I need to use the uio-pci-generic kernel module, but I don’t know how to
make it available in my image.
Yocto 1.3, core-image-minimal, did ‘bitbake linux-yocto –c menuconfig’
and added “Generic driver for PCI 2.3”. It took a while to bitbake
core-image-mi
On 13-03-01 03:53 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:
Hi Rudy,
Thank you for the basic file... I have a question here... The git
directory is already saved on my work pc. What is the necessity to
download it again? The reason behind my asking this question is, it is
secured and so password is requi
On 13-03-01 11:42 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Given that Greg KH has publicly stated linux-3.8 is not a long term
stable kernel, is it worth the effort to support it in Yocto?
We don't need LTSI to make a kernel worth supporting. We pick our
kernels based on the timing of the Yocto release schedu
On 13-03-01 02:15 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote:
Bruce,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
But note, Greg is talking specifically about LTSI, we don't
expect more than one LTSI per year, and we are already locked into
t
On 13-03-05 12:35 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
So the topic branch commit is present much deeper in the branch with
different commit-id.
May be merging of the emgd branch resulted it. Is it issue with the
emgd branch rebased to an undesired point?
It shouldn't be. That commit shouldn't be pres
On 13-03-05 12:56 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:50 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: linux-yo...@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel
On 13-03-05 12:35 PM
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well.
- http://insop.github.com/meta-dl/
FYI: I've already merged and
On 13-03-06 11:24 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
Hi,
On 03/06/2013 08:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add
scheduler testing
-3.8;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}
\
file://defconfig "
PV = "3.8"
-PR = "dl7"
+PR = "dl"
KSRC ?= ""
S = '${@base_conditional("KSRC", "", "${WORKDIR}/git", "${KSRC}", d)}'
Thank you.
In
KBRANCH = "standard/edf"
+SRC_URI =
"git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.8;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}
\
file://defconfig "
PV = "3.8"
-PR = "dl7"
+PR = "dl"
KSRC ?= ""
S = '${@base_conditional("KSRC",
use.
But in the meantime, if you want to enable the support on a yocto BSP,
you can change your "defconfig" to be "sched-deadline.cfg" and only
put the kernel options required to enable the feature.
Cheers,
Bruce
PV = "3.8"
-PR = "dl7"
+PR = "dl&q
ruce
PV = "3.8"
-PR = "dl7"
+PR = "dl"
KSRC ?= ""
S = '${@base_conditional("KSRC", "", "${WORKDIR}/git", "${KSRC}", d)}'
Thank you.
Insop
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-03-07 4:49 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Thanks Juri, I was going to add you to my linux-yocto-3.8 announcement
email and due to some last minute debug activities .. it slipped my
mind. So I'm using this thread to let you, and anyone else that is
interested know that sched_deadline support is avai
t;.
Nothing comes to mind. It all depends on what target you are using, and
if you are using the 'defconfig' that you mentioned earlier. Switching
to the linux-yocto policy and BSP fragments will likely fix your problem.
Bruce
Thank you,
Insop
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:05 AM,
On 13-03-08 03:46 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mar 3, 2013, at 4:12 AM, Satya Swaroop DAMARLA mailto:swar...@weisser.at>> wrote:
hi Rudy, hi guys
Thank you for the chnages to be made. I always do in two steps, I
fetch all and then compile the image...
After fetching then I renamed the file to defco
On 13-03-08 08:27 AM, Insop Song wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Bruce,
That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl.
(https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8)
I have another sugge
On 13-03-08 07:08 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the rest are dependent on the first. Building and installing the
modules to the rootfs works fine. Next question is h
On 13-03-08 12:03 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/07/2013 06:04 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Bruce,
That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl.
(https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8)
I have another suggesti
On 13-03-08 12:40 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
8 mar 2013 kl. 18:12 skrev Bruce Ashfield :
On 13-03-08 07:08 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the rest are dependent
On 13-03-08 12:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/04/2013 08:04 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well.
- http://insop.git
On 13-03-08 2:00 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:08:21 +0100,
Hans Beckérus a écrit :
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the re
On 13-03-08 5:36 PM, David Mulder wrote:
Hi.
I’m running a 10us control loop by (under vxWorks) setting one thread’s
priority to max and not yielding ever (letting other tasks run on other
cores), but Linux seems to thwart that capability: Ubuntu swaps out my
thread occasionally for hundreds of
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>> On 13-03-08 5:36 PM, David Mulder wrote:
>>> I’m running a 10us control loop by (under vxWorks) setting one thread’s
>>> priority to max and not yiel
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Fredrik Markström
wrote:
> The RT-throttling can be disabled with:
>
> echo -1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
> echo -1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
>
> But as mentioned in the other answers things like the system tick, ipi:s
> etc. will interfere. B
On 13-03-09 5:32 AM, Insop Song wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 13-03-08 12:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/04/2013 08:04 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-d
On 13-03-11 09:28 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 13-03-08 2:00 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13
On 13-03-11 09:46 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Le Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:37:44 -0400,
Bruce Ashfield a écrit :
Can you post your exact changes where we can see them ? You need to put
the module_autload variable in a .conf file, whether that be your
local.conf, your machine.conf or you distro
On 13-03-10 11:32 PM, Insop Song wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield
Expect that the yocto project hosted meta-realtime will appear in a
week or so. I'm doing the legwork at the moment, but with some travel
in the upcoming week, the initial push will be delayed by a few
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Insop Song wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>>
>> As an example, I have a schedtool recipe that uses the
>> git://gitorious.org/sched_deadline/schedtool-dl.git
>> repository with a 4 patch series to
On 13-03-11 01:38 PM, David Mulder wrote:
From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:twoer...@gmail.com]
You can call sched_setaffinity() before fork()ing your task, or use
taskset on the cmdline.
Will that work on a core that's offline?
Nope. Only with an online core controlled by the Linux scheduler.
If
On 13-03-11 2:13 PM, David Mulder wrote:
Will that work on a core that's offline?
Nope. Only with an online core controlled by the Linux scheduler.
If you do end up trying to get AMP working, you need to plumbing
to load the other OS/kernel in a reserved memory location, set the
program counter
On 13-03-14 12:52 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
This is for adding rt-app, please let me know what you think.
For next patch, I will add schedtool_dl
This patch looks ok, what are the differences from your original
layer ? I've already imported changes from there, so I'd just
like to hear ab
On 13-03-14 12:52 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
This is for adding rt-app, please let me know what you think.
For next patch, I will add schedtool_dl
Reading this more closely, can you split this into two patches ?
We need to review this in chunks, patch 1 for the rt-app (it
looks fine), and
On 13-03-14 10:09 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've added recipes-kernel to use edf branch and cfg.
FYI: your email keeps bouncing from the linux-yocto mailing list,
check to be sure you signed up with your gmail account, I keep
approving them for now :)
- tested on qemux86
=
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Insop Song wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>
>>
>> FYI: your email keeps bouncing from the linux-yocto mailing list,
>> check to be sure you signed up with your gmail account, I keep
>> appr
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Insop Song wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I've added recipes-kernel to use edf branch and cfg.
I was just merging your changes, and realized that gmail may have dropped
your schedtool-dl recipe.
Can you resend it with your updated series ? I have another schedtool
recip
On 13-03-14 11:36 PM, Insop Song wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Hmm. One of the arbiters is me .. if it doesn't work this time, let me know
and I'll check the list membership.
I've just signed up and got a confirmation email.
I was do
On 13-03-14 11:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-14 11:36 PM, Insop Song wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Hmm. One of the arbiters is me .. if it doesn't work this time, let
me know
and I'll check the list membership.
I've just sign
On 13-03-15 06:33 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. In an effort to shrink our rootfs by some major numbers we found two
low-hanging fruits that we would like to address before cherry picking
and removing lots of good linux functionality. We have no need for the
uImage (3MB) stored in /boot and also w
On 13-03-15 02:02 AM, Volker Vogelhuber wrote:
Volker Vogelhuber writes:
When I change to the build directory and start building the image using
bitbake, there seems to be a git call somewhere in the recipes that
switches the branch of the poky git checkout back to master. Of course
that resul
On 13-03-15 07:36 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 13-03-15 06:33 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. In an effort to shrink our rootfs by some major numbers we
found two
low-h
On 13-03-15 04:47 AM, Insop Song wrote:
---
recipes-extended/images/core-image-realtime.bb |1 +
recipes-tools/schedtool-dl/schedtool-dl.bb | 23 +++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-tools/schedtool-dl/schedtool-dl.bb
diff --git a/r
On 13-03-15 08:04 AM, Volker Vogelhuber wrote:
Hi,
Interesting. Are you working out of yocto/oe-core master ? The linux
yocto kernel support should always fail if the kernel source dir
isn't a git repo (or convert it into one) and not impact the main
yocto/oe-core tree.
As mentioned in the fir
On 13-03-16 6:16 AM, Insop Song wrote:
meta-realtime layer for testing sched_deadline and other real-time applications
Add rt-app, schedtool, define core-image-realtime, and append recipies-kernel
This looks good to me now, I still think we'll have some confusion
between the core "rt" images
On 13-03-18 04:34 AM, Florin Cristian Dan wrote:
Hello, i've managed to burn the BSP image (emenlow) on a usb stick, on
booted on my target machin, apparently it works fine, but i would like
to know how can i eliminate that 10 day timeout, i've tried to enter the
To answer this part of the ques
On 13-03-17 03:36 AM, Insop Song wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
This looks good to me now, I still think we'll have some confusion
between the core "rt" images and core-image-realtime that we are
introducing here.
I may rename it core-image-re
1 - 100 of 1414 matches
Mail list logo
