Hi,
I got following issue when building an image for live-debugging:
ERROR: updatable-app-dev-image-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of
['coreutils'] have failed. If the intention is to defer them to first boot,
then please place them into pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN} ().
Deferring to fir
It's right in the message?
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
/home/sno/gpw-community-bsp/mops-yocto-platform/tmp/work/fischer-poky-linux/core-image-minimal-dev/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.27709
Alex
2018-09-09 10:58 GMT+02:00 Jens Rehsack :
> Hi,
>
> I got following issue when building an image
> Am 09.09.2018 um 13:15 schrieb Alexander Kanavin :
>
> It's right in the message?
>
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
> /home/sno/gpw-community-bsp/mops-yocto-platform/tmp/work/fischer-poky-linux/core-image-minimal-dev/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.27709
>
> Alex
It's not much what stands
There are 2 packages using u-a for nice, but one is using {bindir} and 2nd
one is using {base_bindir}
coreutils is using bindir, find what's using ${base_bindir} and change one
of them to use the same u-a link as the other one.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:59 PM Jens Rehsack wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.09.2
busybox is most likely the one providing it in ${base_bindir}
Recent busybox upgrade probably moved this file.
There is also conflict on /usr/bin/setfattr between busybox and attr now.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:22 PM Martin Jansa wrote:
> There are 2 packages using u-a for nice, but one is usin
So far, so good.
They way to fix that seems either to check why busybox uses ${base_bindir}
nowadays in favor of ${bindir} and fix either busybox or coreutils or attr.
What drives me nuts is not only the failure after the busybox update - why does
core-image-minimal builds successful while core
Does core-image-minimal include both busybox and coreutils? Maybe only -dev
include both.
I'll send fix for attr soon, waiting for some builds to finish testing it.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 8:47 PM Jens Rehsack wrote:
> So far, so good.
>
> They way to fix that seems either to check why busybox u
SBINDIR was changed to ${base_sbindir} in commit:
8cc9c17 policycoreutils: fix installed-but-not-shipped on updated recipes
FILES_${PN}-* must now capture files installed in ${base_sbindir}
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Eric Chanudet
---
recipes-security/selinux/policycoreutils.inc | 13 ++---
Merged, thanks Eric. Unfortunate oversight from a last minute change to
handle some other changes around policycorutils.
-J.
[[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] policycorutils: package files in base_sbindir.]
On 18.09.09 (Sun 19:25) Eric Chanudet wrote:
> SBINDIR was changed to ${base_sbindir} in c