I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from
the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " libcups2"
I get this error:
ERROR: Required build target 'my-demo-image' has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependenc
run-postinsts is now installed by default in image.bbclass, so no need
to include it in each image.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Dudau
---
meta-cgl-common/images/core-image-cgl-initramfs.bb | 2 +-
meta-cgl-common/images/core-image-cgl.bb | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from
> the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe
> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " libcups2"
> I get this error:
> ERROR: Required build target 'my-demo-image' has no
On 2017-05-24 15:26, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from
the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append = " libcups2"
Hello, Yocto.
I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent layers
in various BSPs.
e.g.
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf
># The .bbappend and .bb files are included if the respective layer
># collection is available.
>BBFILES += "
On 2017-05-24 12:30, Takashi Matsuzawa wrote:
Hello, Yocto.
I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent layers
in various BSPs.
e.g.
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf
># The .bbappend and .bb files are included if the respectiv
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Takashi Matsuzawa wrote:
> Hello, Yocto.
> I am a bit confused with dynamic-layers included in some of the recent
> layers in various BSPs.
>
> e.g.
>
> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/master/conf/layer.conf
>
>># The .bbappend and .bb files are i
I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar
for this (and presumably other 'cmake' based packages) - very nice :-)
Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous
build times for such packages (webkitgtk2 can take up to 3 hours on
my [no so slow] build host
On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 16:23 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar
> for this (and presumably other 'cmake' based packages) - very nice :-)
>
> Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous
> build times for such packages (
In our development with Yocto, we use vendor provided layers. At this time we
have to pull those manually (using git or submodule or other technics) to get
the vendor layer on disk before bitbake can start. Does Yocto allow to
automatically pull a yocto layer given a uri, branch and other info
You can try to use gold to save a bit of time linking the beast.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Leonardo Sandoval <
leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 16:23 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > I see that the latest master update has brought a progress bar
> > f
Hello,
Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update
> oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in
> meta-rockchip?
Good idea yes. I will bump u-boot-common_${PV} and u-boot_2017.01 to
v2017.05 in poky (and
On 2017-05-24 16:39, Koehler, Yannick (HPN Aruba) wrote:
In our development with Yocto, we use vendor provided layers. At this time we
have to pull those manually (using git or submodule or other technics) to get
the vendor layer on disk before bitbake can start. Does Yocto allow to
automati
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier
wrote:
> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
>> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update
>> oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differences in
>> meta-rockchip?
>
> Good idea yes. I will bump u-boot-co
Hello,
Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier
> wrote:
>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
>>> u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update
>>> oe-core's u-boot to 2017.05 then just add any differenc
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Frank Meerkoetter <
meerkoet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> ERROR: /projects/meta-chip/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-chip_git.bb: This
> recipe does not have the LICENSE field set (u-boot-chip)
> ERROR: Failed to parse recipe: /data/projects/rpi-a2dp-sink/
> meta-chip/rec
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Frank Meerkoetter <
meerkoet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> WARNING: /projects/meta-chip/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-chip_git.bb:
> :14: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper
> name='/projects/meta-chip/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-chip/defconfig'
> mode='r'
On 05/24/2017 05:23 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Now [tongue-in-cheek], can someone do something about the horrendous
build times for such packages (webkitgtk2 can take up to 3 hours on
my [no so slow] build host!)?
In order of decreasing tongue in cheekiness.
1. Rewrite webkit in something that is
On 05/24/2017 05:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
You can try to use gold to save a bit of time linking the beast.
webkit is already using gold by default, except for some architectures
(aarch64, mips) where it used to fail - maybe it is not necessary anymore.
Alex
--
> I have 22 cores here, and it is not a luxury, but an absolute necessity
to get anything done as far as oe-core maintenance goes. Webkit's
do_compile takes about half an hour - I can almost see that progress bar
move :)
Heh, you're lucky with "oe-core maintenance".
My "bitbake world" builds have
Hi Romain,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Romain Perier
wrote:
> Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier
>> wrote:
>>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to u
On 05/24/2017 11:05 AM, Romain Perier wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Le 24/05/2017 à 16:55, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Romain Perier
>> wrote:
>>> Le 22/05/2017 à 18:08, Trevor Woerner a écrit :
u-boot 2017.05 was released May 10. Wouldn't it be better to update
>>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> I'd check with Marex the u-boot maintainer also. He may have something
> queued up. It is entirely possible he isn't on this list.
Good point. Marek just posted a 2017.05 update to oecore :-)
--
___
Hi Jose,
Sorry for the extreme delay reviewing this.
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 7:31:29 AM NZST Jose Lamego wrote:
> This change supports querying recipes that belong to a specific layer
> by using the prefix "layer:" + the desired layer name, for example:
> "layer: openembedded-core" and this stri
Hello.
>e.g. if you have meta-qt5 in BBLAYERS in /conf/bblayers.conf, then the
>recipes from "dynamic-layers/qt5-layer" are used as well.
Thanks now I can see how it is expected to work.
My issue here now is that some dynamyc-layers/ not being added to
BBFILES list.
I tried '-e' switch with my
Upgrade audit from 2.7.1 to 2.7.6
Signed-off-by: zhengrq
---
recipes-security/audit/{audit_2.7.1.bb => audit_2.7.6.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename recipes-security/audit/{audit_2.7.1.bb => audit_2.7.6.bb} (96%)
diff --git a/recipes-security/audit/audit_2.7.
On 2017-05-24 15:49, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2017-05-24 15:26, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 May 2017 at 13:20, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
I have an image which needs to include the libcups2 package from
the cups recipe. If I try adding this to my image recipe
CORE
Hi Yannick,
This is a feature many people have been wanting for a while, but
getting there has been slow. So slow, in fact, that many projects have
simply gone ahead and implemented their own solutions, all of which
are different from each other, making it all that much harder to get
everyone back
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> My "bitbake world" builds have few components like this, webkitgtk (used to
> have webkit1, webkit2 and webkit2-efl as separate builds), 2 chromiums (x11
> and wayland), cef (luckily broken and whitelisted for a while), firefox,
> qtwebengine,
On 2017-05-23 07:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2017-05-22 22:35, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 2:53:45 AM NZST Gary Thomas wrote:
I have a build where I've never manually removed anything from
the sstate-cache and this same build has been used for hundreds
of builds over th
Il 25 mag 2017 6:12 AM, "Trevor Woerner" ha scritto:
Hi Yannick,
This is a feature many people have been wanting for a while, but
getting there has been slow. So slow, in fact, that many projects have
simply gone ahead and implemented their own solutions, all of which
are different from each oth
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> My "bitbake world" builds have few components like this, webkitgtk (used to
>> have webkit1, webkit2 and webkit2-efl as separate builds), 2 chromiums (x11
>> and wayland), cef (luckily
Hello.
I further did some debugging and BBFOLE_COLLECTION when used in the following
'for' expansion contains only subset of what is avilable finally in
BBFILE_COLLECTION (as appears in '-e' log).
>BBFILES += "${@' '.join('${LAYERDIR}/dynamic-layers/%s/recipes*/*/*.bbappend'
>% layer \
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
