Re: [yocto] gobject introspection needing pygobject (cross-compilation)

2017-03-31 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 03/31/2017 09:06 AM, colin.helliw...@ln-systems.com wrote: I've got a few packages in my image which need gobject introspection. (x86-64 host, ARM target) One is building fine, but the other - NetworkManager - is failing to generate the introspection data because it can't analyse the cross-com

Re: [yocto] gobject introspection needing pygobject (cross-compilation)

2017-03-31 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 31 March 2017 at 09:06, wrote: > I've got a few packages in my image which need gobject introspection. > (x86-64 host, ARM target) > One is building fine, but the other - NetworkManager - is failing to > generate the introspection data because it can't analyse the cross-compiled > library. App

Re: [yocto] gobject introspection needing pygobject (cross-compilation)

2017-03-31 Thread Colin Helliwell
> On 31 March 2017 at 08:26 Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > On 03/31/2017 09:06 AM, colin.helliw...@ln-systems.com wrote: > > > I've got a few packages in my image which need gobject introspection. > > (x86-64 host, ARM target) > > One is building fine, but the other - NetworkManager - is faili

[yocto] a couple bad(?) tags in poky checkout

2017-03-31 Thread Robert P. J. Day
just listed git tags for poky, and a couple that show up that screw up the ordering: ... yocot-1.4.2 <- yocto-1.4.1 yocto-1.4.2 ... yocto-2.1.2 yocto-2.2 yocto-2.2.1 yocto_1.5_M5.rc8 <- ... rday -- Robert P.

[yocto] [PATCH] busybox: make SYSLOGD optionnal

2017-03-31 Thread Romain Perier
Some distros might choose another syslogd provider like rsyslogd. update-alternative will update the link from syslogd to the right provider. However the syslogd feature is still present and enabled in busybox. This commit adds a new configuration fragment to make syslogd optionnal in busybox. Si

[yocto] Missing dependencies on driver header

2017-03-31 Thread colin.helliwell
I have a niggly problem I keep running into, especially with fresh image builds. I have a custom driver, and a user-space library for controlling it; therefore the library includes one of the driver's header files (IOCTL defs etc). However I can't get the dependencies correct in the library recipe

Re: [yocto] Missing dependencies on driver header

2017-03-31 Thread Fabien Lahoudere
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 14:42 +0100, colin.helliw...@ln-systems.com wrote: > I have a niggly problem I keep running into, especially with fresh image > builds. > I have a custom driver, and a user-space library for controlling it; > therefore the library includes one of the driver's header files (IOC

Re: [yocto] GCC on ARM

2017-03-31 Thread Khem Raj
On 3/30/17 10:33 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2017-03-31 07:07, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> On 3/30/17 9:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> [slightly off-topic] >>> >>> I work with a number of embedded ARM devices, all with different >>> processors, hence somewhat different tuning and build directories: >

[yocto] [patchwork][PATCH v3] parsemail.py: Improve find_series_for_mail

2017-03-31 Thread Jose Lamego
Patch Series that are sent as replies to other Series with different patch quantity are not appropriately detected as such, breaking the thread and causing missing revisions. This change improves the find_series_for_mail function to appropriately detect when a message is part of a thread by perfor

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] pitft: Add support for pitft35r

2017-03-31 Thread Rob Woolley
The support for the PiTFT 3.5 inch resistive touchscreen is optional. It may be enabled by adding the following line in local.conf: MACHINE_FEATURES += "pitft pitft35r" Signed-off-by: Rob Woolley --- README | 1 + conf/machine/include/rpi-base.inc | 1 + c

Re: [yocto] GCC on ARM

2017-03-31 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On 3/30/17 9:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> [slightly off-topic] >> >> I work with a number of embedded ARM devices, all with different >> processors, hence somewhat different tuning and build directories: >> Raspberry-Pi (1,2,3 - mostly 3): >>

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] pitft: Add support for pitft35r

2017-03-31 Thread Khem Raj
On 3/31/17 11:19 AM, Rob Woolley wrote: > The support for the PiTFT 3.5 inch resistive touchscreen is optional. > It may be enabled by adding the following line in local.conf: > > MACHINE_FEATURES += "pitft pitft35r" > Looks ok, I have staged it. > Signed-off-by: Rob Woolley > --- > README