Oops, I should have submitted this to the poky list. My bad.
--
Kristian
On 16/12/16 07:58, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> The am335x_evm_config target has a subtle problem which is not present
> in the am335x_boneblack_config target: When booting from an external
> MMC card, the internal MMC is not a
On 15 December 2016 at 09:30, Takashi Matsuzawa
wrote:
>
> Hello Yocto.
>
> I am trying x86-64 BSP image (based on jethro version).
> It has following root filesystem type, and it generats .hddimg file
that I am using.
>
> > IMAGE_FSTYPES = "live"
>
> The issue is that in addition to .hddi
Previously using bbappend files for linux-raspberrypi recipe did not allow to
use "kernel_configure_variable" function to set kernel config variables.
If user wanted to use it in his bbappend with "do_configure_prepend" it was
cleared afterwards. This patch moves cleaning to a separate step.
I'm un
On 16 December 2016 at 02:54, Daniel. wrote:
> Then I tried to append packagegroup-sdk-target adding foo-dev to it
> but still I can't get the headers at the SDK. I'm building the SDK by
> building meta-toolchain and installing by executing the script
> generated at tmp/deploy/sdk.
>
Build a SDK
Hey Burton!
The headers are not in my image. Thank you a lot man!
Regards,
2016-12-16 10:21 GMT-02:00 Burton, Ross :
>
> On 16 December 2016 at 02:54, Daniel. wrote:
>>
>> Then I tried to append packagegroup-sdk-target adding foo-dev to it
>> but still I can't get the headers at the SDK. I'm bu
Am I crazy or I'm seeing reference manual twice at
https://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/active ???
[image: Imagem inline 3]
Regards,
--
"Do or do not. There is no try"
Yoda Master
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://li
Hi Mark,
The layout1 test case currently fails for x32 because there is
insufficient address space for all the libraries.
There's two ways to fix this:
1. Increase mmap_end such that there's more space.
2. Reduce max_page_size so that less space is wasted.
I'm not sure what the implications
Lately I've been seeing very intermittent, sporadic cases where a build will
fail with something similar to:
fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
and nothing else wrong. Simply restarting the build causes it to succeed
without incident. I had been seeing this, maybe, twice a week (on a
On 12/16/2016 05:06 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
I just made this adjustment but given it only happened once or twice a week on
a reasonably busy build machine it might be hard to confirm. I'm also not sure
if setting it to "infinity" is sensible ;-)
I'm guessing other host distros probably also fa
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 2:05 AM, Piotr Lewicki wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Lewicki
> ---
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-rpi.inc | 11 +--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-rpi.inc
> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-rpi.inc
> index
Thank you.
I've added this to the TODO set, and will hopefully have it (and the previous
one) staged very soon.
--Mark
On 12/16/16 8:52 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> The layout1 test case currently fails for x32 because there is
> insufficient address space for all the libraries.
>
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Daniel. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to install cxxtest to nativesdk. After done I went to
> run`cxxtestgen` and got a "bad interpreter" error from bash. I look at
> the script and there was "#! python" at first line.
>
> I know that this is something that
Well this is what I'm already doing, for target, nativesdk and native...
do_install_append() {
sed '1c\
#!/usr/bin/env python' -i ${D}${bindir}/myscript
}
Should I use do_install_class-nativesdk_append instead?
Regards,
2016-12-16 15:04 GMT-02:00 Khem Raj :
>
>> On Dec 15, 2016, at 5:49 PM,
On 12/16/2016 06:06 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On 12/16/2016 05:06 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
I just made this adjustment but given it only happened once or twice a
week on
a reasonably busy build machine it might be hard to confirm. I'm also
not sure
if setting it to "infinity" is sensible ;-)
On 12/16/2016 05:21 AM, Daniel. wrote:
Am I crazy or I'm seeing reference manual twice at
https://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/active ???
nope. the 2.1.1 release has the same issue.
- armin
Imagem inline 3
Regards,
--
"Do or do not. There is no try"
Yoda Master
--
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 05:06 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>>
>> I just made this adjustment but given it only happened once or twice a
>> week on
>> a reasonably busy build machine it might be hard to confirm. I'm also not
>> sure
>> if setting it t
On 16-12-16 17:58, Khem Raj wrote:
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment
Hi
Here is the report for QA Cycle on 2.0.3 rc6
Full Report :
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW50_-_2016-12-09_-_QA_Cycle_2.0.3.rc6
Summary
The QA cycle for 2.0.3 rc6 was completed, there were 4 new bugs found, One
important issue related to ADT repo missing that was already triaged and
A release candidate build for yocto-2.3_M1.rc1 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.3_M1.rc1
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-qt4 : 2c7f8df9039be498f8a2232d1428adb7f4e5e800
meta-intel : 466196fa2f61
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> Actually, scratch that; if bitbake can detect that the limit is not optimal
> at runtime, then it probably should. Direct the bug accordingly.
Bitbake can't possibly know how many builds you're going to spin up at
any one time, and it
20 matches
Mail list logo
