On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:35 -0800, Darcy Watkins wrote:
>
> Is this a known issue? Has it been fixed in a newer branch? If so,
> which one?
I can only say that I've encountered this (when using IPK), too. It doesn't
seem to be related to RPM specifically, unless opkg and rpm just happen to
impl
From: André Draszik
This allows us to completely remove the build time
depenency on libcheck when not needed, reducing
overall build time, and in addition tests can be
converted into a PACKAGECONFIG to enable them if
needed.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik
---
recipes-devtools/bsdiff/bsdiff_git.b
On 18 November 2016 at 21:30, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what the uninative stuff is
> (explanations
> or pointers to explanations appreciated!) but I'm trying to figure out how
> to
> work with it.
It's a prebuild glibc designed to remove the differences betwee
From: André Draszik
Backport a patch that fixes out-of-tree builds, and at
the same time switch to using autotools.bbclass rather
than autotools-brokensep.bbclass
Signed-off-by: André Draszik
---
.../0001-build-allow-out-of-tree-builds.patch | 57 ++
recipes-core/swupd
Excellent! Thanks, Ross, for the explanations :-)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 18 November 2016 at 21:30, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>>
>> To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what the uninative stuff is
>> (explanations
>> or pointers to explanations appreciated!) but I
Wow, this is great news! Thanks, both of you :-)
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Herve
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Herve Jourdain
> wrote:
>> Hi Khem, Trevor,
>>
>> I've submitted part of it yesterday, the rest should come out today
>> hopefully.
>> The 2 machine ty
From: André Draszik
These scripts don't do much and there's no reason for
them to require bash as interpreter.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik
---
recipes-core/swupd-client/oe-swupd-helpers/clr_pre_update.sh | 2 +-
recipes-core/swupd-client/oe-swupd-helpers/kernel_updater.sh | 2 +-
re
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Herve Jourdain wrote:
> Hi Khem,
>
> For cortexa53 in aarch32, the problem is to figure out if we want to cover
> all cases or not.
> Raspberrypi3 is one case of CortexA53 that has crc support, but no crypto
> support. So I could define a cortexa53-32 as being ju
From: André Draszik
The swupd client itself does not depend on bash anymore since
version 3.3.0. Any posix shell is fine. So let's move the
runtime dependency to the appropriate place.
If some layer's oe-swupd-helpers.bbappend does introduce
a bash dependency, it should just state that dependenc
> From: "Paul Eggleton"
> Sent: Friday, 18 November, 2016 2:46:07 AM
> I think the issue is this hasn't really been tested with deb
> packaging. You
> have hit a genuine bug though - would you mind filing a bug at
> http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org?
I still don't fully understand the problem, s
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:22:10 Michel D'HOOGE wrote:
> > From: "Paul Eggleton"
> > Sent: Friday, 18 November, 2016 2:46:07 AM
> >
> > I think the issue is this hasn't really been tested with deb
> > packaging. You
> > have hit a genuine bug though - would you mind filing a bug at
> > http://bugzill
On Sun 2016-11-20 @ 11:28:48 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> I gave a whirl at building and looking closely at them. As it seems
> the OE core patch is
> not needed since for armv8 we want to keep it like x86 ( common )
> I have therefore made changes to your patches and staged them here.
>
> https://github
4.4 does not support 64-bit pi3, do you set the PREFERRED_VERSION in local
conf metadata ?
On 11/21/16 3:07 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Sun 2016-11-20 @ 11:28:48 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> I gave a whirl at building and looking closely at them. As it seems
>> the OE core patch is
>> not needed sinc
Hello,
The latest release of the Yocto Project 2.1.2 (krogoth-15.0.2) is now available
for download at:
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-2.1.2/poky-krogoth-15.0.2.tar.bz2
http://mirrors.kernel.org/yocto/yocto/yocto-2.1.2/poky-krogoth-15.0.2.tar.bz2
A gpg signed version of
On Mon 2016-11-21 @ 04:09:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> 4.4 does not support 64-bit pi3, do you set the PREFERRED_VERSION in local
> conf metadata ?
Yes, my conf/local.conf contains:
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-raspberrypi = "4.8%"
If you clone git://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git and checkout
Hi Trevor,
I've never tried with 4.8, but I sent patches to the list that add 64 bits
support for 4.7.10 - and this one, I tested and it is working.
It's probably possible to port 64 bits to 4.4 as well, but I'm not sure if it's
worth the effort.
I have 4.7 covered, there is some "built-in" leve
On 11/21/16 9:39 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Mon 2016-11-21 @ 04:09:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> 4.4 does not support 64-bit pi3, do you set the PREFERRED_VERSION in local
>> conf metadata ?
>
> Yes, my conf/local.conf contains:
>
> PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-raspberrypi = "4.8%"
>
> If you
Hi Khem,
I believe it would be more appropriate to have it "system-wide", because at
some point it should not be something the apps need to worry about.
Plus, it's really a SoC thing, some armv8 SoCs do implement those options, some
don't (when I say "option" there, I mean it's a HW block that m
On Mon 2016-11-21 @ 10:29:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Did you take
>
> https://github.com/kraj/meta-raspberrypi/commit/361757b9c1538b0a15577d75308ecef93db55965
>
> as well?
Yes, I'm using the following as of 4735e7cde210b2b0b855bca1eb90ef4adca8019b,
which includes 361757b9c1538b0a15577d75308ecef93d
19 matches
Mail list logo
