[yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

2016-10-19 Thread Vivek Per
Hi, I am trying to build tomfastmath and tomcrypt shared libraries using yocto, I couldn't get recipes for libtomcrypt and tomfastmath in web. So started to write one but i am failing to write correct recipe every time. the skeleton i used is both the recipes S = "${WORKDIR}/git" inherit autot

[yocto] Problems with image creation

2016-10-19 Thread Markus Volk
Hi, I am building an image for development in the morty branch. It is quite large and therefore I only create iso images with the variable NOHDD = "1". At task do_image_wic the following is applied: | Error: exec_cmd: cp /home/flk/yocto-pc/poky/build-pc/tmp/work/genericx86-poky-linux/neutrin

Re: [yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

2016-10-19 Thread Markus Volk
tomcrypt builds like this for me: DESCRIPTION = "tomcrypt" HOMEPAGE = " http://www.libtom.net"; LICENSE = "DWTFYW" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${S}/LICENSE;md5=71baacc459522324ef3e2b9e052e8180" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/libtom/libtomcrypt.git;branch=develop \ " SRCREV = "${AUTOREV}" PV = "$

Re: [yocto] Migration info - runqemu

2016-10-19 Thread Lock, Joshua G
Hi Scott, My only real concern is where we say "The script requires a configuration file…". The configuration file isn't compulsory. Previous usage models are supported, as noted below. The configuration file enables fine-grained tuning of options passed to qemu without the runqemu script har

Re: [yocto] Migration info - runqemu

2016-10-19 Thread Robert Yang
Hi Joshua, On 10/19/2016 05:31 PM, Lock, Joshua G wrote: Hi Scott, My only real concern is where we say "The script requires a configuration file…". The configuration file isn't compulsory. Previous usage models are supported, as noted below. If we want to officially support runqemu boot th

Re: [yocto] General policies for CVE fixes

2016-10-19 Thread Sona Sarmadi
> > From https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance: > > > > General policies: > > > > Fixes must go into master first unless they are applicable only to the > > stable branch; if back-porting to an older stable branch, the fix > > should first be applied to the newer stable bran

Re: [yocto] General policies for CVE fixes

2016-10-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-10-19 06:42 AM, Sona Sarmadi wrote: From https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance: General policies: Fixes must go into master first unless they are applicable only to the stable branch; if back-porting to an older stable branch, the fix should first be applied to

Re: [yocto] General policies for CVE fixes

2016-10-19 Thread akuster
On 10/19/2016 03:42 AM, Sona Sarmadi wrote: From https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance: General policies: Fixes must go into master first unless they are applicable only to the stable branch; if back-porting to an older stable branch, the fix should first be applied to

[yocto] Install mozroot-certdata package on a read only root file system

2016-10-19 Thread Nick Wareing
I have an established yocto build which I'm now trying to switch over to having a root file system (eg. EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES += "read-only-rootfs"). However I'm running into an issue with a recipe in the meta-mono layer: mozroot-certdata. I see the culprit is the pkg_postint script (http://git

Re: [yocto] Install mozroot-certdata package on a read only root file system

2016-10-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 October 2016 at 23:26, Nick Wareing wrote: > However I'm running into an issue with a recipe in the meta-mono layer: > mozroot-certdata. I see the culprit is the pkg_postint script ( > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-mono/tree/ > recipes-mono/mozroot-certdata/mozroot-certdata

Re: [yocto] libtomcrypt libtomfastmath recipe

2016-10-19 Thread Burton, Ross
Please considering posting these recipe into meta-oe or similar, tomcrypt etc comes up every few months. And posting a recipe to the list implies you want review, right? :) On 19 October 2016 at 10:12, Markus Volk wrote: > DESCRIPTION = "tomcrypt" > HOMEPAGE = " http://www.libtom.net";

[yocto] Recipe for Turbo.lua ?

2016-10-19 Thread Dinh Nguyen (dinhn)
Hi Yocto Gurus, I am trying to use the Turbo Lua as a framework for building Lua JIT. https://github.com/kernelsauce/turbo.git Is there any existing recipe for “turbo lua” ? Many thanks in advance, —Dinh -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject

[yocto] 2.2 release note material

2016-10-19 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi all, I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I have at the moment. Things missing: * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there anything worth noting? * Known issues that are worth calling out Note that I haven't included all of the bu

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

2016-10-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I have at > the moment. Things missing: > > * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there > anything worth noting? it does not cover th

Re: [yocto] Recipe for Turbo.lua ?

2016-10-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > > Hi Yocto Gurus, > > I am trying to use the Turbo Lua as a framework for building Lua JIT. > https://github.com/kernelsauce/turbo.git > > Is there any existing recipe for “turbo lua” ? I checked at layers.openembedded.org and it seems

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

2016-10-19 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:51:43 you wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I > > have at the moment. Things missing: > > > > * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there > > a

Re: [yocto] 2.2 release note material

2016-10-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-10-19 10:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi all, I've been gathering material for the 2.2 release notes, here is what I have at the moment. Things missing: * Any new features/enhancements for the kernel tools - Bruce, is there anything worth noting? It is probably worth mentioning a few t