[yocto] Re(vival?): Missing files in rootfs when adding links /bin ->/usr/bin and /lib -> /usr/lib in recipe base-files

> When changing package base-files, so that the /bin directory is soft linked > to /usr/bin and the /lib directory is soft linked to /usr/lib, the > > resulting image/rootfs directory structure is missing a lot of files, most of > which are unrelated to any of the directories mentioned > above.

Re: [yocto] Git/yocto newbie question re: submodules and multiple layers

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:24:34PM -0500, Michael Habibi wrote: > Hi, I am well-versed with Git but I haven't really ever had to use > submodules. I am trying to create a git repository on our server that > will host our yocto distribution. Our distribution will include the > yocto repo, plus meta-

Re: [yocto] [meta-swupd][PATCH] swupd-client_git.bb: Make pinned pubkey configurable

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 10:35 +0300, Dmitry Rozhkov wrote: > SWUPD server may move to a new location where a different pubkey > needs to be used and the hardcoded one won't work. > > This makes pinned pubkey configurable. This change sounds good but fails to build here. swupd-client do_install fai

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW35

Current Dev Position: YP 2.2 M3 Next Deadline: YP 2.2 M3 which will be Aug 29th (5:00pm GMT) SWAT team rotation: Anibal -> Tracy https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: * The M3 deadline and feature freeze for 2.2 is on Monday. The patch queue is re

[yocto] [PATCH] [yocto-autobuilder] RunOeSelftest.py: changed to new oe-selftest syntax

oe-selftest is changing syntax with YOCTO #8938. This patch modifies required commands to avoid breaking oe-seltest autobuilder. Should be integrated together with the syntax changing patch. [YOCTO #8938] --- lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunOeSelftest.py | 4 ++-- 1 file c

[yocto] [PATCH] Makefile: remove static linking in Linux build

The removed static linking was for a desire to make rmc run on systems where c libraries are not provided. But it is nothing wrong to dynamically link rmc with libraries. We also don't have to hardcode the way of linking in Makefile since people can specify it in RMC_CFLAGS passed to make command.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Makefile: remove static linking in Linux build

On 8/26/16 3:45 PM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > The removed static linking was for a desire to make rmc run > on systems where c libraries are not provided. > > But it is nothing wrong to dynamically link rmc with libraries. > We also don't have to hardcode the way of linking in Makefile > since peop