Re: [yocto] yocto eclipse ADT for mars

2016-06-07 Thread Esponde, Joel
Hi, On my side, I had to add the luna site as a first step before being able to install ADT with Eclipse Mars: Luna - http://download.eclipse.org/releases/luna ADT plugin is dependent of a version of plugin that is only available in Eclipse Luna. Once the site added, Eclipse should automati

Re: [yocto] calibrator fails to run

2016-06-07 Thread Christian Ege
Hello Frederick, > Goal: Run a cross compiled executable called calibrator from > git://git.ti.com/wilink8-wlan/18xx-ti-utils.git > > Here's my build script: > > export NFSROOT=/srv/imx/CS65X-dev > export > CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/prickle/1.7.2/sysroots/x86_64-pricklesdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-prickle-lin

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:10:58 Oleksandr Poznyak wrote: > Unfortunately You can't have two *.bbappend files per one package (recipe). Let's clarify that for the benefit of others reading along - you absolutely *can* have multiple bbappends per recipe. To answer the original question though, no you

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Oleksandr Poznyak
Thanks, Paul. You are absolutely correct. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:10:58 Oleksandr Poznyak wrote: > > Unfortunately You can't have two *.bbappend files per one package > (recipe). > > Let's clarify that for the benefit of others reading along

[yocto] DISTRO_FEATURES modification from image recipe?

2016-06-07 Thread piotr.lewicki
Hi, Is it possible to manipulate DISTRO_FEATURES from my image recipe file? In my case I added line: DISTRO_FEATURES += " systemd" to local.conf and it worked (added systemd), but when I moved this line to my image.bb recipe I got build errors: ERROR: Required build target 'my-image' has no b

Re: [yocto] DISTRO_FEATURES modification from image recipe?

2016-06-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 7 June 2016 at 13:10, piotr.lewicki wrote: > Is it possible to manipulate DISTRO_FEATURES from my image recipe file? > No. You should control distro features in your distro configuration or if they're for local tweaking in your local.conf. Would it be helpful if you explained why you want t

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] omxplayer: fix compilation with GCC 6

2016-06-07 Thread Jonathan Liu
Specifying -isystem${STAGING_DIR_HOST}/usr/include in INCLUDES gives: In file included from utils/PCMRemap.cpp:26:0: .../build/tmp/sysroots/raspberrypi2/usr/include/c++/6.1.1/cstdlib:75:25: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory #include_next ^

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:00 AM US Pacific Time

2016-06-07 Thread Jolley, Stephen K
Attendees: Stephen, Joshua, Bill, Sona, Randy, Ross, Michael, Agenda: * Opens collection - 5 min (Stephen) * Yocto Project status - 5 min (Stephen/team) *YP 1.8.2 was released 2 weeks ago. *YP 2.0.2 was released last week. *YP 2.2 M1 cut off is next Monday. We have

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Edward Wingate
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Let's clarify that for the benefit of others reading along - you absolutely > *can* have multiple bbappends per recipe. To answer the original question > though, no you cannot have bbappends conditionally applied based on what image > is being

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 5 June 2016 at 17:44, Gary Thomas wrote: > I just updated my Poky repo and did a rebuild and saw this "error" > (although it carried on with the build): > ERROR: base-files-3.0.14-r89 do_install: Taskhash mismatch > ceb25febc6f11a5cc2b3c4a4b0b2c136 verses 44f498452dfce5875451bca66b230e31 > for

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 7 June 2016 at 17:02, Burton, Ross wrote: > It means the hash calculated my the bitbake master was different to the > hash calculated when the worker started up. This usually means that you're > using something like ${TIME} in the recipe but not marking it appropriatly > so the cache ignores

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2016-06-07 18:02, Burton, Ross wrote: On 5 June 2016 at 17:44, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: I just updated my Poky repo and did a rebuild and saw this "error" (although it carried on with the build): ERROR: base-files-3.0.14-r89 do_install: Taskhash mismatch ceb

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2016-06-07 18:20, Burton, Ross wrote: On 7 June 2016 at 17:02, Burton, Ross mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com>> wrote: It means the hash calculated my the bitbake master was different to the hash calculated when the worker started up. This usually means that you're using something like $

[yocto] [PULL] fixes in Dependency Explorer

2016-06-07 Thread Woronicz, Bartosz ( NSN - PL/Wroclaw)
-- Kind regards, Bartosz Woronicz Engineer, Software Configuration (SCM) Nokia Networks - PL/Wroclaw >From 11f4a3e137e2eda76c8dce44c053d0db68d6b208 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bartosz Wieslaw Woronicz Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:08:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] depexp: remove the requirement fo

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:57:24 Edward Wingate wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > > Let's clarify that for the benefit of others reading along - you > > absolutely > > *can* have multiple bbappends per recipe. To answer the original question > > though, no you cannot

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:20:12 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 7 June 2016 at 17:02, Burton, Ross wrote: > > It means the hash calculated my the bitbake master was different to the > > hash calculated when the worker started up. This usually means that > > you're > > using something like ${TIME} in the re

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Joshua G Lock
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 18:58 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-06-07 18:20, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > On 7 June 2016 at 17:02, Burton, Ross > > wrote: > > > > It means the hash calculated my the bitbake master was > > different to the hash calculated when the

[yocto] Secure remote access

2016-06-07 Thread Juan Carlos Trujillo
Has anyone used successfully any secure remote access utility (like Weaved for RPi) on Yocto? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] What's this

2016-06-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 09:24 +1200, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:20:12 Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 7 June 2016 at 17:02, Burton, Ross > > wrote: > > > It means the hash calculated my the bitbake master was different > > > to the > > > hash calculated when the worker started up. Thi

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Edward Wingate
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > So what this will give you is alternative packages to be installed instead of > sysvinit-inittab in your image. I was under the (mistaken) impression that my recipe will run in addition to, not instead of, sysvinit-inittab (occurring after

Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

2016-06-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 16:07:26 Edward Wingate wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > So what this will give you is alternative packages to be installed instead > > of sysvinit-inittab in your image. > > I was under the (mistaken) impression that my recipe will run in >

[yocto] New warning

2016-06-07 Thread Gary Thomas
I'm seeing a lot of these: NOTE: /local/poky-cutting-edge/meta-xyz/.../some-pkg_2.38.0.bb: base_contains is deprecated, please use bb.utils.contains instead. This is all well and good and I'll clean them up as I go. That said, why is the same NOTE printed [at least] twice for every recipe ev

Re: [yocto] New warning

2016-06-07 Thread Christopher Larson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > I'm seeing a lot of these: > NOTE: /local/poky-cutting-edge/meta-xyz/.../some-pkg_2.38.0.bb: > base_contains is deprecated, please use bb.utils.contains instead. > > This is all well and good and I'll clean them up as I go. That > said, why