[yocto] [screenshot][PATCH 0/1] Support Gtk+3

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
This patch is part of the quest to make Sato compatible with GTK+3. Complete WIP collection of patches can be found in jku/matchbox-wip branch at git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib The following changes since commit 3a9688e8a01b63a78f402b4e7c0b8b005fcdfa29: build: change link ordering to f

[yocto] [screenshot][PATCH 1/1] Quick port to Gtk/Gdk 3

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
This still has all the problems that the new API would allow us to fix: mainly that multiple displays will almost certainly not work at all. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- configure.ac | 2 +- screenshot-utils.c | 77 +- 2 files chang

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote: > >> I used to be able to use something like this: > >> VARIABLE = "xyz" > >> > >> and maybe in a .bbappend use > >> > >> VARIABLE_mymachine = "x

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote: I used to be able to use something like this: VARIABLE = "xyz" and maybe in a .bbappend use VARIABLE_m

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2016-04-29 09:24, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote: I used to be able to use something like this: VARIABLE = "xyz" and

[yocto] [xsettings-daemon][PATCH 0/2] Upgrade to Gdk3

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
No code changes needed, just link with the newer library. This patchset is part of the quest to make Sato compatible with GTK+3. Complete WIP collection of patches can be found in jku/matchbox-wip branch at git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib The following changes since commit 9a99528b022554

[yocto] [xsettings-daemon][PATCH 1/2] Need -lx11 in linker flags

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 99ba9f3..b3e7dae 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ AC_PROG_CC dnl TODO: make gconf optional -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(APP

[yocto] [xsettings-daemon][PATCH 2/2] Use gdk-x11-3.0 instead of 2.0

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index b3e7dae..5af0c52 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ AC_PROG_CC dnl TODO: make gconf optional -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(APP

[yocto] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread S . Jaritz
Hej sorry for the user -> usr misswriting. Now the packing works fine. Thanks for the help - now I understand much better how makefiles are processed. There is only the licence problem left. Are there some common way how to handle this? below goes the bb file. ## SUMMARY = "libhired

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
Took it for another ride on our AB last night: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Latest/?filter=ab893d4e1c3efc1ee73c6cfbbb9a64036c63d93c&type=commit The systemd-sysusers stuff I failed to remove, and is broken. There's a pango-native failure that appears to be caused by GIR. And two SDK ima

[yocto] Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

2016-04-29 Thread Richard Purdie
NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going to disable those builds going forward. I don't like doing that but equally this does put a c

Re: [yocto] Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Stefan, So close :) Some more points: On 29 April 2016 at 08:54, wrote: > LICENSE = "COPYING" This should be the name of the license itself, not the filename. Looks a bit like MIT to me. > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${WORKDIR}/git/COPYING;md5=d84d659a35c666d23233e54503aaea51" This URI is

[yocto] Help on submitting patch to yocto projcet

2016-04-29 Thread SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P
Hi, Can any one guide me on submitting or upstreaming patch to git.yoctoproject.org recipe? Thanks in advance. Regards, Sivasubramanian -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:24:23 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote: > I used to be able to use something like this: >

[yocto] Antwort: Re: Re: Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread S . Jaritz
Hej Finally we made it - Thanks to you all for helping me! I attached my bb file for that case someone is searching for a bitbake recipe for building the libhiredis ## SUMMARY = "libhiredis" SECTION = "lib" LICENSE = "MIT" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d84d659a35c666d23233e

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2016-04-29 11:51, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:24:23 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:24:55 Gary Thomas wrote: I used to be able to u

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:00:58 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-04-29 11:51, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:24:23 Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2016-04-29 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:06:16 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-04-29 07:08, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >>>

[yocto] [matchbox-terminal][PATCH 0/1] Upgrade to Gtk+ 3 and current Vte

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
The big change is that spawning a shell is now done "manually" as vte_terminal_fork_*() have been removed. This patchset is part of the quest to make Sato compatible with GTK+3. Complete WIP collection of patches can be found in jku/matchbox-wip branch at git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib T

[yocto] [matchbox-terminal][PATCH 1/1] Upgrade to current Vte and Gtk+ versions

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- Makefile.am | 4 ++-- configure.ac | 2 +- main.c | 49 +++-- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 480fbc0..ef2125c 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Mak

[yocto] [matchbox-config-gtk][PATCH 0/1] Upgrade to Gtk+3

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
This one is a trivial port. This patchset is part of the quest to make Sato compatible with GTK+3. Complete WIP collection of patches can be found in jku/matchbox-wip branch at git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib The following changes since commit 3ed74dfb7c57be088a5ab36e446c0ccde9fa1028:

[yocto] [matchbox-config-gtk][PATCH 1/1] Port to Gtk+3

2016-04-29 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen --- appearance/mb-appearance.c | 4 ++-- configure.ac | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/appearance/mb-appearance.c b/appearance/mb-appearance.c index 34640b4..6dfe98e 100644 --- a/appearance/mb-appearance.c +++ b/app

Re: [yocto] Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 April 2016 at 10:59, wrote: > Finally we made it - Thanks to you all for helping me! I attached my bb > file for that case someone is searching for a bitbake recipe for building > the libhiredis > If you submit the recipe to meta-oe then you can share development of the recipe with others.

Re: [yocto] what's the "standard" for adding .dts patches to a BSP layer?

2016-04-29 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-04-28 14:14, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > >looking for common practice here ... what's the canonical way > > that one should add content to a .dts file for a new board -- all > > at once, or broken into patches associated with corresponding .s

Re: [yocto] Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

2016-04-29 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
On 29 April 2016 at 09:44, Richard Purdie wrote: > NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the > project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing > we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going > to disable those builds going forwa

Re: [yocto] Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 29 April 2016 at 10:59, wrote: >> >> Finally we made it - Thanks to you all for helping me! I attached my bb >> file for that case someone is searching for a bitbake recipe for building >> the libhiredis > > > If you submit the recipe to

Re: [yocto] Antwort: Re: how to configure the build packages of a makefile based libary

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 April 2016 at 15:01, SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P wrote: > > If you submit the recipe to meta-oe then you can share development of the > > recipe with others. > > How can we do that? Kindly guide. > In general the README at the top of the layer that your recipe would be suited for should tell you ho

Re: [yocto] [xsettings-daemon][PATCH 2/2] Use gdk-x11-3.0 instead of 2.0

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 April 2016 at 08:47, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(APP, [gconf-2.0 gdk-x11-2.0 x11]) > +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(APP, [gconf-2.0 gdk-x11-3.0 x11]) > Looking at this, so little of GTK+ is used (just gdkx). Maybe we should port this to pure XLib? Ross --

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

2016-04-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in > fixing them is welcome. > > 1. kernel older than 4.4, backport needed fixed into these branches or > move to newer kernels. > 2. uboot dont have gcc6 compiler header f

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

2016-04-29 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in > >> fixing them is welcome. > >> > >> 1. kern

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18

2016-04-29 Thread Jolley, Stephen K
Current Dev Position: YP 2.2 M1 Next Deadline: YP 2.2 cut off: June 13, 2016 SWAT team rotation: Randy -> Benjamin https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: *YP 2.1 M4.rc2 is going to become the final 2.1 release! *WDD started to ri

Re: [yocto] [matchbox-terminal][PATCH 1/1] Upgrade to current Vte and Gtk+ versions

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
Merged and pushed, thanks Jussi. I've started tagging the last GTK+ 2 commit with 'GTK+2'. Ross On 29 April 2016 at 11:41, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen > --- > Makefile.am | 4 ++-- > configure.ac | 2 +- > main.c | 49 +++

Re: [yocto] [matchbox-config-gtk][PATCH 1/1] Port to Gtk+3

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi, mb-appearance.c: In function 'new_frame': mb-appearance.c:352:3: warning: 'gtk_alignment_get_type' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] *align = g_object_new (GTK_TYPE_ALIGNMENT, ^ In file included from /usr/include/gtk-3.0/gtk/gtk.h:248:0, from mb-appearance.c:28:

Re: [yocto] [screenshot][PATCH 1/1] Quick port to Gtk/Gdk 3

2016-04-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 April 2016 at 08:06, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > This still has all the problems that the new API would allow us to > fix: mainly that multiple displays will almost certainly not work > at all. > screenshot-utils.c: In function 'screenshot_grab_lock': screenshot-utils.c:251:3: warning: 'gdk_po

[yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 2.1 (krogoth 15.0.0) Released

2016-04-29 Thread Graydon, Tracy
Hello, The latest release of the Yocto Project 2.1 (krogoth-15.0.0) is now available for download at: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-2.1/poky-krogoth-15. 0.0.tar.bz2 http://mirrors.kernel.org/yocto/yocto/yocto-2.1/poky-krogoth-15.0.0.tar.bz2 A gpg signed version of these

Re: [yocto] Manipulating code and Building in offline environment

2016-04-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Lars Larsen wrote: > Hello > > I have 2 questions > > I have finally managed to build an image like I want it. > > > I consists of a kernel. > > The ROS framework. > > And our proprietary software under git control > > > What I want to achieve is the following: > >

Re: [yocto] Error while buildng SGX

2016-04-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Harinath maddelal wrote: > Hi all, > > > When i build sgx using yocto, im getting following errors. > > The same builds fine when i use my local gcc of version 4.8.3. > > > I have used 1.8.1 Yocto its using 4.9.2 gcc. > > > Can you please help me resolve the issue.

Re: [yocto] Help on submitting patch to yocto projcet

2016-04-29 Thread Khem Raj
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 2:46 AM, SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P wrote: > > Hi, > Can any one guide me on submitting or upstreaming patch to > git.yoctoproject.org recipe? Thanks in advance. Generally README of the concerned project describes the upstreaming process. Additionally you can read http://www.ope

Re: [yocto] Change in override behavior?

2016-04-29 Thread Khem Raj
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 3:09 AM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > >> >> By experimentation, I have found that XYZ_append_ seems to do >> the correct thing, even when has upper case letters. Maybe this >> is an oversight that will be fixed? > This seems to be an oversight and should be fixed for cons

Re: [yocto] Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

2016-04-29 Thread Khem Raj
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:44 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the > project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing > we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going > to disable those builds

[yocto] [AUH] Upgrade status: 2016-04-30

2016-04-29 Thread auh
AUH finished upgrade batch the result patches/logs can be found at: https://logs.yoctoproject.org/auh//20160428014037.tar.gz, next are the statistics: Recipe upgrade statistics: * Succeeded: 46 tcl, 8.6.5, Robert Yang clutter-gst-3.0, 3.0.18, Jussi Kukkonen libsoup-