I am trying to configure dropbear to do the following.
1) Only listen on port 22 of the tun0 interface (made by openvpn service).
2) Only use public key authorization.
To do this I've overridden the dropbear.socket file with my own.
start
[Uni
Current Dev Position: 1.9 Milestone 1 (M1)
Next Deadline: M1 cut off of June 23rd
Key Status/Updates:
There is an RFC about removing bitbake's update_data datastore operation being
considered on the mailing list.
YP 1.6.3 and has been released this week. The 1.6.x series will now move to
commun
Hi Ed,
On 05/27/15 16:32, Ed Sutter wrote:
> This year I have two ongoing iMX6 based linux projects, and may need
> to use a beaglebone
> or RPi for some other small project.
>
> The point of the above detail is that I'd like to backup a bit and
> attempt to use Yocto to
> organize all four of the
Hi Scott,
On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks about
> building out-of-tree-modules on the target -
Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that document the other
day. As soon as I saw a section titled "Bu
On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>> I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks
>about building out-of-tree-modules on the target -
>
>Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that
Hi Robert,
On 05/18/15 13:50, Robert Tulke wrote:
> Hi i’ve a question, how i can create a keybinding or mapping for a specific
> key to run an application?
>
> So what i want, i’ll press for example F12 and that will start a application?
It depends.
If you're running a GUI environment with a w
On 05/29/15 15:28, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the
>> opinion that doing development work on the target is wrong (if for no
>> other reason than to prove your cross-development setu
On May 29, 2015 3:37:34 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>On 05/29/15 15:28, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> On May 29, 2015 3:21:04 PM EDT, Trevor Woerner
>wrote:
>>> If it were me, I'd just remove that section altogether. I'm of the
>>> opinion that doing development work on the target is wrong (if fo
On 5/29/15, 12:21 PM, "Trevor Woerner" wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>On 05/18/15 10:42, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>> I have a section in the YP Linux Kernel Development Manual that talks
>>about building out-of-tree-modules on the target -
>
>Interestingly enough, I was just reading through that document
Ok - so we established that we want it... If I get some clarifications in there
about the "rarity" of the situation that would allow someone to develop on the
target and also the benefits of having a verified cross-development system if
they were to develop on the host, does the rest of the sect
On 5/29/15, 12:46 PM, "Rifenbark, Scott M"
wrote:
>Ok - so we established that we want it... If I get some clarifications in
>there about the "rarity" of the situation that would allow someone to
>develop on the target and also the benefits of having a verified
>cross-development system if they w
Darren,
Thanks for the extra information. I will take action on it and then throw the
URL to the section out here in the list for a look.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Hart, Darren
>Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 12:59 PM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M; Trevor Woerner; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Hi,
I added a clarifying paragraph at the start of this section. Also, for the
last paragraph I mentioned kernel-devsrc. I could not find any commits that I
understood looking in poky for "kernel-devsrc" so from the comment you gave
Darren about the package not being uniformly installed on al
HI team
Question what are the necessary IMAGE_INSTALL_append to build a c
hello world in an core-image-minimal ?
If I just add gcc .. then I need "as" when I try to gcc -0 hello hello.c
I will add gcc and gcc-dev .. anyone else that I might be missing ?
Thanks a lot and regards
Victor Rodrigu
If a BSP layer sets a preferred kernel using an equals sign (e.g.
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-raspberrypi") is there any
way of overriding this decision that doesn't involve:
1) forking the layer
2) hoping the maintainer accepts a relevant patch
3) creating my own DISTRO
?
If I crea
> On May 29, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>
> If a BSP layer sets a preferred kernel using an equals sign (e.g.
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-raspberrypi") is there any
> way of overriding this decision that doesn't involve:
> 1) forking the layer
> 2) hoping the mainta
This issue ended up going away when I wiped my build folder and started
with a new one.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Jesse Cobra wrote:
> Always reproducible on this build folder.
>
> Just created a new build folder and kicked off a brand new build. See if
> that works...
>
> my setup:
>
> r
17 matches
Mail list logo