[yocto] LLVM/CLang only works in Multilib x64

2015-03-03 Thread Yu, Chan KitX
Hi all, As some of you might know through IRC and the mailing list itself, I'm trying to get LLVM/CLang to work in Yocto in platforms other than x64 multilib. To set the purpose of this email clear, I am only trying to get LLVM to work as host-only compiler. As much as I want to get LLVM cross

Re: [yocto] Fwd: dizzy 1.7 udev automount misbehaviour

2015-03-03 Thread Michaƫl Burtin
Hi Yocto, For the record the issue is in current dizzy branch and occurs when using systemd and udev along with udev-extraconf mount scripts. By default, systemd-udevd.service has the option MountFlags=slave, which means that mounts are only seen by udevd process. This explains some weird behavior

[yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" while ref manual variable glossary uses KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter" is there a preference for the usage of the .scc suffix? (i'm assuming they're both valid, i didn't actually

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 05:41:43 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: > I am generated the yocto SDK using the yocto sdk script "bitbake > core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk" command. With this command I am able to > generte the installation script file and .manifest file. > > I run the installation script

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Raghavendra Kakarla
Hi Paul Eggleton, Thank you for your response. Now my issue is resolved. I have some doubts on yocto-sdk. Can you please clarify them. When i Built SDK for YOCTO, I am getting a cross compilation tool chain. With which i am able to build the applications for my platform. I wanted to confirm,

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 10:26:46 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: > When i Built SDK for YOCTO, I am getting a cross compilation tool chain. > With which i am able to build the applications for my platform. I wanted to > confirm, whether SDK means a toolchain to build the applications or is > there som

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: > > KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" > > while ref manual variable glossary uses > > KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter" > > is there a preference for the usage of the .scc

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Raghavendra Kakarla
Hi Paul Eggleton, Where can i get the documents generated by the yocto sdk. Regards, Raghavendra. From: Raghavendra Kakarla Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 3:56 PM To: Paul Eggleton Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: SDK generation issue Hi Paul Eggleto

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
Assuming you built the SDK you had installed with "doc-pkgs" in SDKIMAGE_FEATURES, they would be in the target sysroot i.e. /sysroots//usr/share/doc/ On Tuesday 03 March 2015 11:55:22 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: > Hi Paul Eggleton, > > Where can i get the documents generated by the yocto sdk. >

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Raghavendra Kakarla
Hi Paul Eggleton, Shall i get any API information in the generated SDK documents. Regards, Raghavendra. From: Paul Eggleton Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 5:40 PM To: Raghavendra Kakarla Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: SDK generation issue Assuming

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
Maybe, it depends on the individual projects. We haven't embarked upon any documentation standardisation effort. On Tuesday 03 March 2015 12:17:45 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: > Hi Paul Eggleton, > > Shall i get any API information in the generated SDK documents. > > Regards, > Raghavendra. > ___

[yocto] what is the "simplest unit of kernel Metadata"?

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims: "The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a .scc file that describes the fragment." that pretty clea

[yocto] Remove and create link symbolic /etc

2015-03-03 Thread Cleiton Bueno
Problem in remove /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf and create link symbolic to ln -sf /app/etc/snmpd.conf /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf Build error: Collected errors: * check_data_file_clashes: Package ideale wants to install file /home/bueno/yocto/proj-bbb-2015-vter/tmp/work/beaglebone-poky-linux-gnueabi/vter2015/

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" while ref manual variable glossary uses KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter" is there a

Re: [yocto] what is the "simplest unit of kernel Metadata"?

2015-03-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-03-03 08:32 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims: "The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a .scc file

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-03-03 11:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" wh

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > >kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: > > > > > > KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" > > > > > > while ref man

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: ... snip ... > This format: KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter" > > Is the historical remnant. The tools can convert that to > features/netfilter/netfiler.scc internally. It was a shortcut to > make the features more human readable when they followed th

Re: [yocto] SDK generation issue

2015-03-03 Thread Jim Rafert
Try doing: ${CC} test.c This will invoke the cross compiler with all the compilation flags required to produce an executable for the target, using libraries on the target root file system. From: Raghavendra Kakarla [raghavendra.kaka...@inedasystems.com

Re: [yocto] difference in explanation of kernel "build directory"

2015-03-03 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Robert, I talked with Bruce on this and determined that we can update that first string with the second. Thanks, Scott >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:1

Re: [yocto] kernel dev manual ... KMACHINE/fri2 content seems out of date

2015-03-03 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Yes - correct. I switched out fri2 with emenlow. Scott >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:08 PM >To: Yocto discussion list >Subject: [yocto] kernel dev manual

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Documentation: Ref Manual, fill out missing machines for MACHINE variable

2015-03-03 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Applied... thanks. >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 11:46 PM >To: Yocto discussion list >Subject: [yocto] [PATCH] Documentation: Ref Manual, fill out missing >mach

[yocto] Release Candidate Build for yocto-1.8_M3.rc3 now available.

2015-03-03 Thread Poky Build User
A release candidate build for yocto-1.8_M3.rc3 is now available at: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-1.8_M3.rc3 Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible. Build hash information: meta-intel : 367fd4758d23318b3adab8021d7bdc8b56e04917 meta-fsl-arm : 5d8185213b3

Re: [yocto] [Recipe reporting system] Upgradable recipe name list

2015-03-03 Thread Robert Yang
On 03/02/2015 07:16 PM, recipe-rep...@yoctoproject.org wrote: python-git0.3.60.3/ Robert Yang It there anything wrong with the reporting system, please ? Please see the "0.3/". // Robert -- ___ yocto mailing lis

[yocto] [][meta-selinux][PATCH] Fix bad path in d382d5

2015-03-03 Thread flihp
From: Philip Tricca BBFILE_COLLECTIONS for meta-virtualization is 'virtualization-layer'. This is required to get lxc bbappend working when meta-virtualization is added to bblayers.conf. Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca --- meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend |1 - virtu

[yocto] defunct cedartrail BSP still mentioned in ref manual

2015-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
while intel's cedartrail BSP was removed back in 2013, it's still used as an example in the explanation of the KMACHINE variable in the variable glossary: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-KMACHINE someone might want to swap in a current example for that.