[yocto] do_install() is not getting called

Hi All, I am creating a new recipe in bsp layer. So I created a bb file inside the recipe. Then from the build directory, I am able to successfully compile the source files and was able to create the library ( bitbake -c compile -f ). This is a makefile based package and I don't have an instal

Re: [yocto] do_install() is not getting called

Am 08.11.2014 13:10 schrieb "hari kumar" : > > Hi All, > > I am creating a new recipe in bsp layer. So I created a bb file inside the recipe. > Then from the build directory, I am able to successfully compile the source files and was able to create the library ( bitbake -c compile -f ). This is a

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Perl: fix PERL5LIB settings

Am 07.11.2014 um 12:55 schrieb Burton, Ross : > Hi Wolfgang, > > On 5 November 2014 19:29, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.14.3.bb | 4 ++-- > meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.3.bb| 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Perl w

[yocto] Build optimization question

So I am using core-image-minimal and trying to shrink things as much as possible for boot speed. I wrap the bitbake command in some other commands to basically extract the image and then attach it to a kernel as a ramdisk. So the size of the image is critical to boot speed. In some of my custo

Re: [yocto] Build optimization question

On Nov 8, 2014 9:02 AM, "Dean" wrote: > > So I am using core-image-minimal and trying to shrink things as much as possible for boot speed. I wrap the bitbake command in some other commands to basically extract the image and then attach it to a kernel as a ramdisk. So the size of the image is criti

Re: [yocto] Build optimization question

On Nov 8, 2014 9:23 AM, "Brian Hutchinson" wrote: > > > On Nov 8, 2014 9:02 AM, "Dean" wrote: > > > > So I am using core-image-minimal and trying to shrink things as much as possible for boot speed. I wrap the bitbake command in some other commands to basically extract the image and then attach i

Re: [yocto] Build optimization question

On 8 November 2014 14:23, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > I'm planning to just start excluding some of the packages in it ... I > don't need sound, wireless, Bluetooth etc. > > If you don't need sound, wifi, and bluetooth then remove the relevant flags from DISTRO_FEATURES and they'll never be built.

[yocto] [PATCH] [meta-mingw] *-mingw32.conf: Add whitelist of WINDRES and RC to hash

WINDRES and RC values are exported when building for a mingw32 target. These values, due to being exported, end up in the signature hash for everything in the system. By adding these to the whitelist we prevent contamination and allow the system to properly reuse existing -native and other sstate

[yocto] [PATCH] [meta-mingw] Add whitelist of WINDRES and RC to hash

Add the two specific exported values to the hash, otherwise task hashes change and things rebuild unnecessarily. (perl-native may also fail to rebuild.) Mark Hatle (1): *-mingw32.conf: Add whitelist of WINDRES and RC to hash conf/machine-sdk/i686-mingw32.conf | 2 ++ conf/machine-sdk/x86_64

Re: [yocto] Build optimization question

Take a look at poky-tiny distro: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf As you are using BBB you can optimize u-boot code and remove some board detection steps. I noticed that MLO generated by u-boot 2014.07 mainline is too much faster than the o

Re: [yocto] Build optimization question

Diego, I agree with Ross here in from my experience with embedded systems the three best ways to strip your root file system are by removing unneeded boot loader coe, removing unneeded kernel components and that of striping your middle ware to smaller versions like Busybox and other similiar pack