On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Nathan Rossi wrote:
> Reverting this commit on the top of master results in a functional build.
> I've done some 'bitbake -e' scanning with and without the above commit, and
> I cannot see any differences between the variables that are changed in the
> meta-xilinx
Hi Todd,
I can't reproduce the problem, the rpm has more space than ipk is because
of the IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE, which is 50M * 1.3 by default.
Would you please try the following commands:
1) $ ls -stlh
tmp/deploy/images/wandboard-dual/core-image-minimal-dev-wandboard-dual-*.ext3
2) $ fs
Hi Christopher,
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 23:02:43 Thornburg, Christopher A wrote:
> I must be missing something obvious. It's easy for me to build and install a
> toolchain package using bitbake meta-toolchain
> The resulting toolchain package shows up at...
> ./tmp/deploy/sdk/poky-eglibc-i68
Hi Paul,
thank you for that hint and description of your workaround!
Looks like you've invested a little bit more time into working around this
issue than me :-)
I've added "-f" to the update-rc.d.bbclass and now it's working like a charm:
diff --git a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass b/meta/cla
Hi all,
I'm trying to include a recipe that depends on tracker_0.14.2. When I build
the image it is failing to do_compile tracker with the following output:
*| make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/stuart/yocto/fsl-community-bsp/build/tmp/work/cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/tracker/0.14.2-r7/t
Hi Edward,
On Friday 22 November 2013 11:00:44 Edward Vidal wrote:
> Is chkconfig part of any image?
It's part of the LSB images and the self-hosted image, but you probably don't
want to build those unless you're looking for those things exactly. You can
add chkconfig to any image just by addin
Bruce,
Any updates on this?
Regards,
--
*dS
Diego Sueiro
/*long live rock 'n roll*/
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-10-29 11:31 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> I've created new build setup with this configuration:
>>
>> BB_VERSION= "1.18.0
On 11/28/2013, 10:37 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
Bruce,
Any updates on this?
Which part ? :) The defconfig "selection" (prioritization) was
explained by instrumenting the SRC_URI processing order, and it
was behaving as expected.
And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated
re
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield <
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote:
> And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated
> release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were
> seeing.
>
This patch was applied in some repo?
Regards,
--
*dS
Diego Sue
On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedicated
release branch for dylan fixed the other patching issue you were
seeing.
This
Hi Bruce / Diego,
On Thursday 28 November 2013 11:28:41 Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> >
> > mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
> > And the patch I attached for the kern-tools to use the dedi
On 11/28/2013, 11:41 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Bruce / Diego,
On Thursday 28 November 2013 11:28:41 Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11/28/2013, 11:26 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
And the patch I attached f
Hi Todd,
I can reproduce the similar problem now, I think that it should be a
bug of e2fsprogs, it seems the debugfs can't know the free space
correctly, and thus it appears no free blocks, I'm sorry to say that
I can't fix it in a short while, but I will fix it in one or two weeks,
maybe you ca
13 matches
Mail list logo
