Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 29 August 2013 10:11:31 Navani Srivastava wrote: > In order to execute > "bitbake -c populate_sdk poky-image" are we supposed to declare > BUILD_ARCH or SDK_ARCH somewhere in local.conf file? > Yocto Documentation has not mentioned anything like that. Just a doubt as > "bitbake poky-ima

Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Navani Srivastava
>>You should set SDKMACHINE if you need the machine that runs the SDK to be a different architecture from the machine Please find the local.conf file which clearly shows SDKMACHINE is i686 and I want to build for arm1136 arch.. So MACHINE ??= "EBboard" is given where EBboard refers to arm1136 archi

Re: [yocto] bitbake -c populate_sdk -v poky-image

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 29 August 2013 13:57:12 Navani Srivastava wrote: > >>You should set SDKMACHINE if you need the machine that runs the SDK to be > > a > different architecture from the machine > Please find the local.conf file which clearly shows SDKMACHINE is i686 and > I want to build for arm1136 arch

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Hans, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 21:22:36 Hans Beckerus wrote: > On 2013-08-28 6:06, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 August 2013 17:08:41 Hans Beckérus wrote: > >> Hi, I am a little bit confused about how to handle these two and what > >> they are supposed to solve. I have so far neve

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Hans Beckérus
Hi Paul, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Wednesday 28 August 2013 21:22:36 Hans Beckerus wrote: >> On 2013-08-28 6:06, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> > On Wednesday 28 August 2013 17:08:41 Hans Beckérus wrote: >> >> Hi, I am a little bit confused about how to han

Re: [yocto] confusion about DEPENDS vs RDEPENDS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Paul / Nicolas, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 15:15:27 Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > From: Nicolas Dechesne > > if the source code changes, the version of the recipe needs > > to change too. if you change the source code without bumping > > the version, the package might not be rebuilt properly > > in

[yocto] Lighttpd web server on BlueGiga's APx4 development board

2013-08-29 Thread vinayak.garad
Hi, I am using BlueGiga's APx4 development board which have Yocto BSP. It have Lighttpd web-server configured. I have seen that Lighttpd web-server on Yocto BSP uses cgi-bin and .json scripts for HTML. I would like to use cgi-bin and .xml tags for HTML. I visited Yocto's GIT server but didn't g

[yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should be in the standard kernel configuration. Is thi

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 11:36 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should

[yocto] Partitioned Image Creation and Initramfs Problem for ALIX3D3

2013-08-29 Thread Eren Türkay
Hello all, As you may already know, I have been working on a BSP for ALIX3D3[0]. I enabled specific kernel configurations and reached to the point of booting the board with its features enabled. I can boot the board with "live" image type. However, what I want to have is a direct partitioned hdd i

Re: [yocto] OE recipes- linphone build error in poky-9.0.0 build environment

2013-08-29 Thread Amit Kumar
Thanks for replay, I have follow the steps suggested by Mr. Paul, but still i am facing an error. I wants to build the linphone along with my Yocto Project build environment setup. I found linphone recipes in openembedded git. I have added that recipe and also add the dependanc

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
> Which kernel version ? This is linux-yocto-3.8 and the dylan-9.0.0 yocto. > It's not about them being common or not, it's about BSPs following a > base policy versus having wild, per-board behaviour. I've cleaned up many items from the yocto-bsp generated {{machine}}.cfg that are already add

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 02:56 PM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: Which kernel version ? This is linux-yocto-3.8 and the dylan-9.0.0 yocto. It's not about them being common or not, it's about BSPs following a base policy versus having wild, per-board behaviour. I've cleaned up many items from the yocto-bsp gen

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:36 -0400, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: > It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that > creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg > file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. > > It seems like

[yocto] Help with merging files

2013-08-29 Thread Timothy Bean
Hello all, I am a little new to Yocto and bitbake. Could someone please help me with probably some simple concepts that seem to be missing. I would like to build a initramfs image to boot to my device (Freescale i.MX6) I think I need to change the image type to cpio.gz for the output. But my rea

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
Some additional information: I noticed that the two CONFIG's are also defined in the fragment features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg. They are defined without using the non-hardware flag. > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 29

Re: [yocto] Status of 1.5_M4 release candidate.

2013-08-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > An update on where we are at: > > rc1 is still churning. There was one autobuilder issue with regards to > genericx86 in nightly-x86-lsb. I've built this out by hand and > populated the release with it as well as corrected the ab issue.

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

2013-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-08-29 5:39 PM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: Some additional information: I noticed that the two CONFIG's are also defined in the fragment features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg. They are defined without using the non-hardware flag. That's could be a contributing factor, if they have their bucket chan

[yocto] build stuck at cloning GIT Repo.

2013-08-29 Thread arun kumar
My YOcto Project build, The first build is stuck here -- Loading cache: 100% |#| ETA: 00:0