Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
remove it. There are basically two chunks of code in there.
The meta-linaro pieces in there haven't been touched in two years and
are there
I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of the
latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires Python
2.7.3".
My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (and is out of
support, so no updates!) and the "latest" "Quick Start
On 06/28/2013 04:55 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of the latest
updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires Python 2.7.3".
My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (and is out of support, so
Hi Chris,
On Friday 28 June 2013 09:55:42 Chris Tapp wrote:
> I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of
> the latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires
> Python 2.7.3".
>
> My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (
On 28 June 2013 10:40, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
> FWIW, for older hosts where installing these tools in the normal fashion is
> difficult or impractical, there is now buildtools-tarball (which replaces and
> extends the old external-python-tarball). This builds on the relocatable SDK
> installer to
Yep - this is on my plate to document.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Paul Eggleton
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:40 AM
>To: Chris Tapp
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [yocto] Bitbake requ
Hi Paul,
On Friday 28 June 2013 11:16:14 Paul Barker wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 10:40, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > FWIW, for older hosts where installing these tools in the normal fashion
> > is difficult or impractical, there is now buildtools-tarball (which replaces
> > and extends the old external-
On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
> Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
> known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
has it, but stable/testing/unstable have a working 3.8
If I am not mistaken you can do:
bitbake meta-toolchain-qte
then you'll get a toolchain with qmake.
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:41:41 +0200
From: satyaswaroop.dama...@gmail.com
To: e...@eukrea.com; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Qt4 - qmake in toolchain for Qt/X11
Hi Eric,
Can you
On Friday 28 June 2013 10:50:01 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> Here is the story on the relationship between the YP Metadata Layers as
> listed in the YP Source Repositories and the OpenEmbedded Metadata Index.
> Functionally, the YP layers are a subset of the OE layers. However, the YP
> layers are
On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
remove it. There are basically two chunks of code in there.
The meta-linaro pieces in there h
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 08:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Hi Bruce/Darren,
> >
> > My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
> > a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
> > remove it. There a
On 13-06-28 08:57 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 08:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has
All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:03 AM
>To: Richard Purdie
>Cc: Hart, Darren; yocto; Rifenbark, Scott M; Michael Halstead
>Subject: Re: poky-extras
>
>O
On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
never easy, so I won't agonize over whether or not an "extras"
should be on the end. But the name should be clear that it isn't
th
I would favor adding "extras" into the name then so there is no confusion over
it being the main thing.
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:41 AM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: Richard Purdie; Hart, Darren; yocto; Mi
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
>
> Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
> never easy, so I won't agonize over whether or not an "extras"
>
Just out of curiosity...
On 27 June 2013 06:06, Ross Burton wrote:
> buildset-config/nightly-arm.conf |2 ++
> buildset-config/nightly-fsl-arm.conf |2 ++
> buildset-config/nightly-fsl-ppc.conf |2 ++
> buildset-config/nightly-mips.conf|2 ++
> buildset-config/nightly-oec
Aha. And apparently there was a typo in the README that lead you down the
wrong path. Looks like it just got fixed.
(Btw I meant to leave the response on-list last time, so I'm bringing this
back on-list.)
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jerrod Peach wrote:
> Ram,
>
> Looks like the fatal
Bruce,
I'm still working on the changes you asked for in the meta branch, but here
is the pull request for the new bsp branch. I'll have to send the meta
layer changes too. Should I send those to this list or the meta-lsi
list?
-paul
The following changes since commit
fff57da7886cf5e99c07adf66
On 28 Jun 2013, at 10:06, ChenQi wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 04:55 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
>> I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of
>> the latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires
>> Python 2.7.3".
>>
>> My development system is Ubun
On 6/28/13 5:53 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
has it, but st
On 28 June 2013 18:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Fedora 16 and newer
> Arch Linux
> Debian Experimental
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if there are others.
>
> (I filed a bug for Fedora, so FC 18 and FC 19 will be fixed if they're not
> already.)
I'm pretty sure FC17 onwards is fixed.
Ross
__
On Jun 24, 2013, at 7:57 AM, "Burton, Ross" wrote:
> meta-yocto is what makes Poky Poky, otherwise it would be just oe-core
> + bitbake. oe-init-build-env looks for sample files in $TEMPLATECONF,
> which is one of the things that get munged as
> bitbake+oe-core+meta-yocto becomes poky.
yeah, m
On Jun 24, 2013, at 10:15 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Trevor Woerner
> wrote:
> Awesome! That's great news! I was hoping someone would "beat me to it"
> :-) I look forward to reading it once it's done. Do you have a
> publisher or an expected
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> We use android repo internally to manage the layers and I think there are
> projects out there like here
>
> http://www.jann.cc/2012/08/08/building_freescale_s_community_yocto_bsp_for_the_olinuxino.html
>
> which are also using android repo to ma
On Jun 27, 2013, at 3:06 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
> The meta-toolchain* recipes are deprecated, so when building
> meta-toolchain-gmae
> also build the SDK for core-image-sato.
as an aside, if meta-toolchain is deprecated why should we carry
meta-toolchain-gmae as well? it seems a special SDK
o
On Friday 28 June 2013 12:01:39 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Just out of curiosity...
>
> On 27 June 2013 06:06, Ross Burton wrote:
> > buildset-config/nightly-arm.conf |2 ++
> > buildset-config/nightly-fsl-arm.conf |2 ++
> > buildset-config/nightly-fsl-ppc.conf |2 ++
> > buildset-
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M"
wrote:
> I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the OE
> area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it that way to
> dampen the existence of the "many" differences :)
>
hmm may be they shoul
On 2013-06-27 04:06, Ross Burton wrote:
The meta-toolchain* recipes are deprecated, so when building meta-toolchain-gmae
also build the SDK for core-image-sato.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
If/when the meta-toolchain recipes go away, how do I create a stand-alone
toolchain
derived from Poky/Yo
Thanks Khem for this extra insight.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:59 PM
>To: Burton, Ross
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [yocto] Documenting YP Deve
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:56 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > > All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
32 matches
Mail list logo
