Hi ,
We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use yocto-kernel-tools to
manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the old method. So we want to
know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to manage the kernel ? Is there a
plan?
Thanks!
Rick
__
at the moment, the only mention of that task is in the reference
manual. does it deserve additional coverage, perhaps in the ADT
manual? just asking.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, On
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying "no PyGobject" whereas
> python-object has already been installed. Can anyone kindly give a help?
>
>
> $ hob
> FATAL: Gtk+, PyGtk and PyGobject are required to use Hob,
> You
here: https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/projects, the
para on the Build Appliance is mentioned twice.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
>
> poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some stuff
> and
> ran acros
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 14:23 +0200, Mihai Lindner wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying "no PyGobject"
> > whereas python-object has already been installed. Can anyone kindly give a
> > help?
> >
O
> got errors during "bitbake core-image-minimal" on yacto 1.3 + jasperforest
> BSP
> how can I just clean everything then re-build all?
> since I don't modify any kernel code before make the build, will this
> error caused by build environment settings problem?
> message from
> "tmp/work/x86_64-lin
i'm still a bit unclear on the differences(?) between what is listed
as "required packages for the host development system" in the
reference manual, and what's listed as ASSUME_PROVIDED in the oe-core
bitbake.conf file.
should those two lists not match? for instance, the ref manual
states th
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Rick Yang wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use
> yocto-kernel-tools to manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the
> old method. So we want to know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to
> manage the kernel
i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for "local
kern-tools work".
is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
kern-tools-native, and that bbappend appears to simply let the
developer work with the head of kern-tools rat
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
> kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for "local
> kern-tools work".
>
> is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
> kern-tools-native, and that bbappend a
Hi,
I'm a yocto mostly-newbie, trying to find my way. I have a custom layer
that I am using to build a kernel. The layer right now consists of a few
kernel patches and a defconfig and is based on the standard kernel
otherwise.
When I do a diff on my defconfig and the bitbake generated .conf
At 2012-12-24 20:37:26,"Mihai Lindner" wrote:
>On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 14:23 +0200, Mihai Lindner wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> >
>> > I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying "no PyGobject"
>> > whereas python-object has already bee
13 matches
Mail list logo
