On 04/09/12 21:25, William Mills wrote:
> I suspect the current issue is just growing pains for a case that has
> not been tested.
The simplest fix would be for meta-ti to preppend itself to the path the
same way meta-yocto does, i.e., in the layer.conf
BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}"
In fa
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> The simplest fix would be for meta-ti to preppend itself to the path the
> same way meta-yocto does, i.e., in the layer.conf
>
> BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}"
>
> In fact, this is the *only* way that a layer can override any co
On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and
> not prepend, the thinking being that then the search path matches the order
> of
> the layers listed in bblayers
On 03/09/12 22:00, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi Jack,
On 03/09/12 18:52, Jack Mitchell wrote:
As some of you know I run a small Raspberry Pi community site[1] and I
would like to write a follow up to an earlier blog post about preparing
yourself for programming on the Raspberry Pi with the Yocto Pr
- @Override annotations can be used starting with jre >= 1.6
- Headless build plugin limited the java compilation to 1.5 (no matter what the
system jdk is)
Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol
---
.../org.yocto.sdk.headless.build/build.properties |4 ++--
.../sdk/remotetools/wizards/bsp/MainPag
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and
> > not prepend, the thinking being that then the sea
On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:
Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the
poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not
claiming meta-ti is clean yet but I want to understand the Intel
Documentation fixes for the recent package group changes as well
as a few other things I noticed along the way.
The following changes since commit 12f77236b602e9ec43e845c8cec060ad342af19c:
documentation: Fixed links to BitBake User Manual (2012-09-04 12:05:21 -0700)
are available in the git r
The meta-intel BSPs and yocto-bsp tool no longer use a bbappend of
task-core-tools-profile to add systemtap, so these sections should be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml| 24
.../dev-manual/dev-manual-bsp-appendix.xm
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-bitbake.xml |2 +-
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-variables.xml |8
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-bitbake.xml
b/documentation/poky-ref-manua
Task has been renamed to package group, and there are some minor changes
in how package group recipes should be constructed - in particular the
inherit of packagegroup.bbclass is now highly recommended as it will set
appropriate defaults and automatically add complementary -dev and -dbg
packages.
* apps-console-core has been effectively replaced by splash
* apps-x11-core, apps-x11-games have been removed
* ssh-server-* were added quite a while ago, add these here
* x11 has been added
* x11-base has changed behaviour slightly
* doc-pkgs was added
* nfs-server never exported the entire /, so
These file paths are no longer valid, instead point to the section
of the reference manual with more information on valid IMAGE_FEATURES.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-variables.xml |9 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Also add a definition for PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN since the default value of
PACKAGES now includes this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-variables.xml |9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-var
* core-image-core was renamed to core-image-x11 and the editor and file
manager were removed.
* core-image-basic's description has been updated to reflect its
intended purpose
* core-image-lsb is intended to be standalone - should not be
associated with core-image-basic.
* The Pimlico applica
List frameworks we provide that are likely to be used by people these
days - Pimlico has been removed and GuPNP and Matchbox don't really
belong. Also slightly modify the sentence following so that it is clear
that these are optional.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../yocto-project-qs/yocto-p
Update the BitBake "Preferences and Providers" section to remove
references to these two Pimlico applications that have been removed,
and tweak the example slightly so it is technically correct.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-bitbake.xml |8
1 fil
* For PE/PV/PR/PN these pertain to a recipe ("package" was used here
historically).
* References to variables should not be prefixed with $ in the text
* Add text about suffixing RCONFLICTS as per other package variables
* Make ALLOW_EMPTY example complete
* Clarify and add example for AUTOREV
S
Add a short section about packagegroup.bbclass.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-classes.xml | 22 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-classes.xml
b/documentation/poky-ref-manu
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-classes.xml | 28 +++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-classes.xml
b/documentation/poky-ref-manual/ref-classes.xml
index b836e2c..9e07c62 100
On 09/05/2012 02:15 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> The simplest fix would be for meta-ti to preppend itself to the path the
>> same way meta-yocto does, i.e., in the layer.conf
>>
>> BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}"
>>
>> In fact, th
On 09/05/2012 07:20 AM, William Mills wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:
>>
>>> Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the
>>> poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not
>
On 09/05/2012 08:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and
not prepend,
On 05/09/12 15:45, William Mills wrote:
>> Its accepted that most layers will append to BBPATH. I do think its
>> acceptable for a distro policy layer to prepend though and this is why
>> meta-yocto does this. I don't remember the exact reason right now but
>> the principle stands.
>
> So how shou
On 12-09-05 10:20 AM, William Mills wrote:
On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:
Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the
poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not
claiming meta-ti is cl
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> This is now livefor anyone interested.
> http://www.pimpmypi.com/blog/blogPost.php?blogPostID=7
Shouldn't the instructions include a step adding the meta-raspberrypi
layer to conf/bblayers.conf?
___
On 05/09/12 16:20, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
This is now livefor anyone interested.
http://www.pimpmypi.com/blog/blogPost.php?blogPostID=7
Shouldn't the instructions include a step adding the meta-raspberrypi
layer to conf/bblayers.conf?
Well
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:45 -0400, William Mills wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2012 08:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> >> On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> >>> It has been
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
.../base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bbappend |3 +++
meta-tlk/recipes-core/base-files/files/motd|7 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta-tlk/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bbappend
create
The following changes since commit 16a7879b98352b70e8c17181912a26212d716c87:
meta-emenlow: rename recipes-gnome bbappends (2012-09-04 10:04:37 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib sgw/meta-tlk
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contri
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend |6 ++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |6 ++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
.../recipes-core/psplash/files/psplash-tlk.png | Bin 0 -> 42295 bytes
meta-tlk/recipes-core/psplash/psplash_git.bbappend | 10 ++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta-tlk/recipes-core/psplash/files/psplash-tlk.png
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> ---
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend |6 ++
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |6 ++
> 3 files chan
I also found that I had to add:
BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "yes"
at the end of my conf/local.conf since I received a:
ERROR: No recipes available for:
/home/trevor/devel/yocto/raspi/poky/meta-raspberrypi/recipes-multimedia/libav/libav_0.7.4.bbappend
the first time I tried baki
On 09/05/2012 10:08 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend |6 ++
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bba
I successfully built core-image-minimal. I now what to understand how the
build determine what linux kernel it will be using because the next step I
will want to do is add my own recipe that references my own kernel. I
have not been able to find where the linkage to specific kernel is. Can
so
Hi,
On 05/09/12 18:35, James Macon wrote:
> I successfully built core-image-minimal. I now what to understand how the
> build determine what linux kernel it will be using because the next step I
> will want to do is add my own recipe that references my own kernel. I
> have not been able to fi
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>
>
> It will add another .1 to the PR, if PR = 4.1, it will become 4.1.1
sorry, I was more interested in the time limited kernel option.
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yocto
On 5 September 2012 18:13, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> I also found that I had to add:
>
> BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "yes"
>
> at the end of my conf/local.conf since I received a:
>
> ERROR: No recipes available for:
>
> /home/trevor/devel/yocto/raspi/poky/meta-raspberrypi/recipes-m
I just built Yocto/Poky for the raspberrypi, following the
recent thread on this list. I noticed that the resulting SD
image is ~4GB, but most of that space seems to be unused:
$ ssh root@192.168.1.150
Warning: Permanently added '192.168.1.150' (RSA) to the list of known hosts.
root@192.16
On 09/05/2012 10:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
It will add another .1 to the PR, if PR = 4.1, it will become 4.1.1
sorry, I was more interested in the time limited kernel option.
Sorry, you had put that right under the PR line and JaMa had also
Sorry for the late. Forgot to hit the sent button yesterday.
Attendees:
Alex, MichaelH, Cristian, Darren, Tom, LaurentiuP, Nitin, Bjorn, BogdanM,
Bruce, Sean, Dave, Paul, Saul, Richard, LaurentiuS, Cristiana, Ross, ScottR
Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto 1.3 status - 10 min
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> This is to prevent the HW BSP generated by the autobuild from being used in
> production, it's added by the autobuilder to the HW bsps.
thats fine. However, I am using linux-yocto unmodified from meta-yocto
so this will now
force me to generate
I found it but this is only partially the answer. I found
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-yocto" in qemu.inc but there
is no recipe for linux-yocto. There are recipes for linux-yocto_3.* ,
linux-yocto-tiny, and linux-yocto-rt_3*.
Somewhere during the build process something is appe
On 12-09-05 03:03 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
This is to prevent the HW BSP generated by the autobuild from being used in
production, it's added by the autobuilder to the HW bsps.
thats fine. However, I am using linux-yocto unmodified from meta-yocto
On 05/09/12 20:03, James Macon wrote:
> I found it but this is only partially the answer. I found
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-yocto" in qemu.inc but there
> is no recipe for linux-yocto. There are recipes for linux-yocto_3.* ,
> linux-yocto-tiny, and linux-yocto-rt_3*.
>
> So
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On 12-09-05 03:03 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>
>>> This is to prevent the HW BSP generated by the autobuild from being used
>>> in
>>> production, it's added by the autobuilder to the HW bs
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > > It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to app
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:18:43PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 02:00 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:57:19PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> >> ---
> >> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
> >> .../recipes-kern
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> .../base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bbappend |3 +++
> meta-tlk/recipes-core/base-files/files/motd|7 +++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend |6 ++
> .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> .../recipes-core/psplash/files/psplash-tlk.png | Bin 0 -> 42295 bytes
> meta-tlk/recipes-core/psplash/psplash_git.bbappend | 10 ++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+),
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:56 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> The following changes since commit 16a7879b98352b70e8c17181912a26212d716c87:
>
> meta-emenlow: rename recipes-gnome bbappends (2012-09-04 10:04:37 -0500)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:48 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The root of the problem is that meta-yocto mixes up policy and hardware
> support which is bad. It also means its not compliant with the new Yocto
> Project compliance criteria and hence is not Yocto Project Compatible.
>
> Now we've got t
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:16:44 Gary Thomas wrote:
> I just built Yocto/Poky for the raspberrypi, following the
> recent thread on this list. I noticed that the resulting SD
> image is ~4GB, but most of that space seems to be unused:
>
>$ ssh root@192.168.1.150
>Warning: Permanent
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:58 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
> > meta-yocto in this scenario ?
>
> a) I am targeting multiple chips, including TI Omap and Intel Atom.
>
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:20 -0400, William Mills wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:
> >
> >> Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the
> >> poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bi
On 05/09/2012 18:13, Trevor Woerner wrote:
I also found that I had to add:
BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "yes"
at the end of my conf/local.conf since I received a:
ERROR: No recipes available for:
/home/trevor/devel/yocto/raspi/poky/meta-raspberrypi/recipes-multimedia/libav/l
On 05/09/2012 22:46, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:16:44 Gary Thomas wrote:
I just built Yocto/Poky for the raspberrypi, following the
recent thread on this list. I noticed that the resulting SD
image is ~4GB, but most of that space seems to be unused:
$ ssh root@1
On 04/09/12 09:43, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 03/09/12 22:00, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi Jack,
On 03/09/12 18:52, Jack Mitchell wrote:
As some of you know I run a small Raspberry Pi community site[1] and I
would like to write a follow up to an earlier blog post about preparing
yourself for programm
Hi
I need to add a new environment that LD_LIBRARY_PATH when I use my own
external toolchain .
I add 1 line in external-toolchain.inc "LD_LIBRARY_PATH =.
"${EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN}/i586-target-linux-gnu/lib:"",but there is no effect.when
I used this toolchain to compile , there als
On 05/09/2012 22:46, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:16:44 Gary Thomas wrote:
I just built Yocto/Poky for the raspberrypi, following the
recent thread on this list. I noticed that the resulting SD
image is ~4GB, but most of that space seems to be unused:
$ ssh root@1
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:21 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Tomas Frydrych
> > wrote:
> >> snip...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
> >> meta-yocto in this scenario
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 22:57:22 Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 22:46, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:16:44 Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> Also, is it possible to just build the SD image much like I do for
> >> other devices like the BeagleBoard, albeit with differ
On 05/09/12 22:56, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 22:46, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 12:16:44 Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> I just built Yocto/Poky for the raspberrypi, following the
>>> recent thread on this list. I noticed that the resulting SD
>>> image is ~4GB, but mo
On 05/09/12 22:46, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:58 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
>>> meta-yocto in this scenario ?
>>
>> a) I am targeting multi
66 matches
Mail list logo
