[yocto] image recipe gives error: has no buildable providers

2012-08-06 Thread Tim Verstraete
Hi, I am making my own recipe for an image based on core-image-core and has been generated by HOB. So after I have made HOB selection (to try it out) I saved the HOB files and created my own BSP. I went to yocto-bsp create test arm and got a BSP directory. I adapted the machine file, placed t

[yocto] Method to use same sstate_cache across 32&64bit machines

2012-08-06 Thread Venkata ramana gollamudi
Hi All, Is there any method exists to use same sstate_cache across 32&64bit machines? Like can we generate 32bit sstate_cache for native packages on 64bit machine, so that same sstate_cache can be used across 32bit & 64bit (with 32bit ib support) machines, without a need to rebuild the native

Re: [yocto] [meta-baryon][PATCH 1/2] webmin: include webmin-module-acl

2012-08-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 14:25:01 Kevin Strasser wrote: > Webmin's logging module depends on webmin-module-acl. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser > --- > recipes-extended/images/baryon-image.bb |1 + > recipes-extended/webmin/webmin_1.570.bb |2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+),

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] webmin: remove nfsd check from exports-lib.pl

2012-08-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 02 August 2012 10:20:13 Kevin Strasser wrote: > Webmin expects the userspace version of nsfd and attempts to > find its pid when applying a new set of nfs exports. This check > fails because baryon is configured to install the kernelspace > version. In result the command that is assigne

Re: [yocto] image recipe gives error: has no buildable providers

2012-08-06 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tim Verstraete wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am making my own recipe for an image based on core-image-core and has been > generated by HOB. > > > > So after I have made HOB selection (to try it out) I saved the HOB files and > created my own BSP. > > > > I went to yocto-bs

Re: [yocto] Adding gcc-4.5.4 release back into oe-core

2012-08-06 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > Hi Khem, > Do you think it makes sense to add gcc-4.5.4 back into > oe-core, if it turns out that gcc-4.7.2 is causing a lot of issues for some > targets? You can add it to your layer. Although that might be a lot more work

Re: [yocto] Method to use same sstate_cache across 32&64bit machines

2012-08-06 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote: > Hi All, > > > > Is there any method exists to use same sstate_cache across 32&64bit > machines? > > Like can we generate 32bit sstate_cache for native packages on 64bit > machine, > > so that same sstate_cache can be used across 32b

[yocto] Agenda: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2012-08-06 Thread Liu, Song
Agenda:   * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Yocto 1.3 status - 10 min (Song/team) https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.3_Status * SWAT team rotation: Beth -> Paul * Opens - 10 min * Team sharing - 20 min -Original Appointment- We encourage people attending the meeti

[yocto] [meta-baryon] [PATCH 1/2] proftpd: update package to 1.3.4b

2012-08-06 Thread Kevin Strasser
The contrib directory now contains its own Makefile which is used during installation. It was required to pass in the DESTDIR variable. Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser --- recipes-extended/proftpd/files/contrib.patch | 25 recipes-extended/proftpd/proftpd_1.3.3c.bb | 53

[yocto] [meta-baryon] [PATCH 2/2] webmin: update package to 1.590

2012-08-06 Thread Kevin Strasser
The patch "fdisk-partprobe-fix.patch" has been accepted upstream and is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser --- .../webmin/files/fdisk-partprobe-fix.patch | 16 --- recipes-extended/webmin/webmin_1.570.bb| 147 recipes-extended/webmin/webmi

Re: [yocto] Adding gcc-4.5.4 release back into oe-core

2012-08-06 Thread Scott Garman
On 08/04/2012 12:19 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi Khem, Do you think it makes sense to add gcc-4.5.4 back into oe-core, if it turns out that gcc-4.7.2 is causing a lot of issues for some targets? I'll politely add that discussions like this (specifically about oe-core) belong on the oe-core maili