Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

So that about a disto refusing this and possibly other BSP layers ? Should the disto.conf select of nativesdk be made machine specific on all machines in meta-fsl-ppc ? And one added target after a meta-fsl-ppc rebase would break stuff, I guess. Br David Sent from Android -Original Mess

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

On Thursday 05 July 2012 23:00:17 Stewart, David C wrote: > Guys - I'm really struggling with this overall concept of concurrency. > > It implies that if Paul and I are sharing the same project and I make a > change to a .bb file to experiment with something (assuming we have the > ability to do t

[yocto] [PATCH 0/7] move intel bsps to v3.4 kernel

From: Nitin A Kamble These commits move Intel BSPs to v3.4 kernel. The crownbay v3.4 kernel is not quet ready yet, so for crown bay the default kerenl is still v3.2 The following changes since commit f5dcebe57832551219da048945237a7cf7bda369: linux-firmware: Fix FILESEXTRAPATHS typo (2012-06-

[yocto] [PATCH 1/7] FishRiver: add recipe extention for linux-yocto_3.4

From: Nitin A Kamble Tested this on FishRiver hardware, and it works as expected. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux

[yocto] [PATCH 2/7] FishRiver: set v3.4 as the default kernel recipe version

From: Nitin A Kamble Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- meta-fishriver/conf/machine/fishriver.conf |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-fishriver/conf/machine/fishriver.conf b/meta-fishriver/conf/machine/fishriver.conf index 289e41d..ec2e87f 100644 ---

[yocto] [PATCH 3/7] emenlow: add recipe extention for linux-yocto_3.4

From: Nitin A Kamble This is tested on the emenlow hardware, and it works as expected. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/li

[yocto] [PATCH 4/7] emenlow: set v3.4 as the default kernel recipe version

From: Nitin A Kamble Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf b/meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf index 26ca43b..afb3866 100644 --- a/meta-emenl

[yocto] [PATCH 5/7] sugarbay: add recipe extention for linux-yocto_3.4

From: Nitin A Kamble This is tested on the HuronRiver (sugarbay laptop) platform, and it works as expected. Signed-Off-By: Nitin A Kamble --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |9 + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-sugarbay

[yocto] [PATCH 6/7] sugarbay: set v3.4 as the default kernel recipe version

From: Nitin A Kamble Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf b/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf index adb1fa7..a80c938 100644 --- a/meta

[yocto] [PATCH 7/7] crownbay: add recipe extention for linux-yocto-3.4

From: Nitin A Kamble In testing on the crownbay hardware found that, X is failing due to missing emgd driver. Hence the v3.4 kernel is not made the default kernel for crownbay bsps yet. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend | 15 +++

Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

typo refusing = reusing. -Original Message- From: David Nyström [david.nyst...@enea.com] Received: Friday, 06 Jul 2012, 12:49 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org [yocto@yoctoproject.org]; raj.k...@gmail.com [raj.k...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf:Let

[yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and the local download directory. I got an error compiling the kernel. It didn't fail yesterday early

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone > of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to > support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and the local download > directory. > Are

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and the

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > >> Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone > >> of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only mo

[yocto] Yocto WebHob update

Hi everyone, Here's the latest update (2.0) from the London team on the WebHob design https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Web_Hob_Design There's a PDF of all the screens of the latest version (v.2.0) of the application , a link

Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:49 AM, David Nyström wrote: > So that about a disto refusing this and possibly other BSP layers ? > Should the disto.conf select of nativesdk be made machine specific on all > machines in meta-fsl-ppc ? And one added target after a meta-fsl-ppc rebase > would break stuf

Re: [yocto] Yocto WebHob update

Nice update! I particularly like the availability of the sources and source manifest. Not sure how we will be able to do the “test” feature on page 28 across the web. Dave From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kosem Sent: Friday, July 06,

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

> From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:23 AM > To: Stewart, David C > > On Thursday 05 July 2012 23:00:17 Stewart, David C wrote: > > Guys - I'm really struggling with this overall concept of concurrency. > > > > It implies that if Paul and I

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

On Friday 06 July 2012 17:13:45 Stewart, David C wrote: > > From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:23 AM > > To: Stewart, David C > > > > On Thursday 05 July 2012 23:00:17 Stewart, David C wrote: > > > Guys - I'm really struggling with this ove

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone of poky and meta-intel. che

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone of poky and meta-intel. che

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:30 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > >> On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > Something has changes very

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > >> On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > Something has changes very

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: S

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > >> On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom

[yocto] Documentation improvement

I was looking at the Yocto Development Manual (Latest), section 4.6.2. Creating Config Fragments. I was confused about the file statement and the naming of the directory to locate the fragment file until I found a similar discussion in the BSP Guide (lastest) section 1.2.10. Linux Kernel Confi

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: O

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: O

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > >> On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > > On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > > >> On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > >>> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13

Re: [yocto] build failure on denzil - n450

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:13 -0400, James Abernathy wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Tom Zanussi > wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote: > > On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy

[yocto] [PATCH] Fix for psplash segmentation fault

Fix segmentation fault when passing -a without angel value. When psplash -a is called instead of psplash -a it will segmentation fault calling out of bound argv[]. git://git.yoctoproject.org/psplash Signed-of-by: Aws Ismail - dif

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Fix for psplash segmentation fault

s/angel/angle :) Aws\ On 07/06/2012 04:53 PM, Aws Ismail wrote: Fix segmentation fault when passing -a without angel value. When psplash -a is called instead of psplash -a it will segmentation fault calling out of bound argv[]. git://git.yoctoproject.org/psplash Signed-of-by: Aws Ismail ---

Re: [yocto] Documentation improvement

Jim, I am looking at that section in the BSP Guide and it is actually out of date regarding the 1.2.10 section. In the section it lists the linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend file (which is probably lagging as it should be 3.2). Anyway, the listing uses KERNEL_FEATURES and I believe that KBRANCH is now

Re: [yocto] Documentation improvement

Cool! Sent from my iPhone On Jul 6, 2012, at 5:06 PM, "Rifenbark, Scott M" wrote: > Jim, > > I am looking at that section in the BSP Guide and it is actually out of date > regarding the 1.2.10 section. In the section it lists the > linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend file (which is probably lagging

Re: [yocto] Yocto WebHob update

On 06/07/12 09:17, Stewart, David C wrote: Nice update! I particularly like the availability of the sources and source manifest. Not sure how we will be able to do the “test” feature on page 28 across the web. Suse Studio does it (iirc) by installing a VNC server onto the image, running tha

Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

Yes this was my suggestion, since you might not want to change the nativesdk kernel headers for all machines in all BSP layers, if the distro is using multiple BSP layers, which it probably should be able to do. Setting this with machine overrides in distro.conf is possible but quite messy IM

Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

On Jul 6, 2012 5:35 PM, "David Nyström" mailto:david.nyst...@enea.com>> wrote: > > Yes this was my suggestion, since you might not want to change the nativesdk > kernel headers for all machines in all BSP layers, if the distro is using > multiple BSP layers, which it probably should be able to