[yocto] task 240 of 4900 and task 1526 of 4900 failed When I followed "The Yocto Project Quick Start"

2012-05-31 Thread fungjack
Hello all! When I followed "The Yocto Project Quick Start" and ran bitbake -k core-image-sato, two tasks(240 and 1526) failed. My host is Ubuntu 10.04. Who can give me some advices? Thanks! NOTE: Running task 240 of 4900 (ID: 586, /home/jack/work/poky-denzil-7.0/meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl

Re: [yocto] task 240 of 4900 and task 1526 of 4900 failed When I followed "The Yocto Project Quick Start"

2012-05-31 Thread Mihai Lindner
On 05/31/2012 11:49 AM, fungjack wrote: > > Hello all! > When I followed "The Yocto Project Quick Start" and ran bitbake -k > core-image-sato, two tasks(240 and 1526) failed. My host is Ubuntu 10.04. Who > can give me some advices? Thanks! > > NOTE: Running task 240 of 4900 (ID: 586, > /home/j

[yocto] PR and bbappends

2012-05-31 Thread David Nyström
Hi All, Is there a good way to get the layer name ?, I want to add PR .= "+${LAYER_NAME}.0" to my bbappends for clarity and versioning when having multiple meta layers. Where a bbappend:s on package X can reside in one, two or more layers. Best Regards, David _

Re: [yocto] task 240 of 4900 and task 1526 of 4900 failed When I followed "The Yocto Project Quick Start"

2012-05-31 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
If you are running denzil, be sure to use the manual set from the website. Quick Start is http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [yocto] PR and bbappends

2012-05-31 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:54 AM, David Nyström wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there a good way to get the layer name ?, I want to add > PR .= "+${LAYER_NAME}.0" to my bbappends for clarity and versioning when > having multiple meta layers. > Where a bbappend:s on package X can reside in one, two or more

[yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread jfabernathy
Using a DN2800MT (Marshalltown) Intel board, I'm testing the meta-cedartrail using edison branch and noticed an issues with the serial console. The cedartrail.conf in the machine directory has the following statements: SYSLINUX_OPTS = "serial 0 115200" SERIAL_CONSOLE = "115200 ttyS0" APPEND +=

[yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Hi all, As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. Neither 'vanilla' nor 'branded' are meant in any negative way. We did ha

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Hi, On 31/05/12 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > I would like to know what the Yocto Project community thinks about these 2 > approaches. Vanilla please, 'branded' applications are so 1990s. I think very few users care whether an application looks different on a different OS then their own, but

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 31/05/2012 18:08, Tomas Frydrych wrote: Hi, On 31/05/12 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: I would like to know what the Yocto Project community thinks about these 2 approaches. Vanilla please, 'branded' applications are so 1990s. I think very few users care whether an application looks diffe

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2][linux-yocto-3.2] fri2 serial port fixes for preempt-rt

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
These patches address are lockup when attempting login over serial on the fri2 when running the preempt-rt kernel. I have sent the first patch out for review, but have not yet heard back. The serial port works and appears fairly stable. However, I would prefer to keep these patches in yocto/preempt

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
pch_uart_interrupt() takes priv->port.lock which leads to two recursive spinlock calls if low_latency==1 or CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y (one otherwise): pch_uart_interrupt spin_lock_irqsave(priv->port.lock, flags) case PCH_UART_IID_RDR_TO (data ready) handle_rx_to push_rx tty_port_tty

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] [RT] pch_uart: Correct spin_lock and irqsave usage in pch_console_write

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
pch_console_write was calling: local_irq_save() spin_lock(a) spin_lock(b) ... spin_unlock(b) spin_unlock(a) local_irq_restore() Which trips the rtmutex debug code: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:646 Update t

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/31/2012 09:55 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > Hi all, > > As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make > a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a > 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. > Neither '

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/31/2012 09:11 AM, jfabernathy wrote: > Using a DN2800MT (Marshalltown) Intel board, I'm testing the > meta-cedartrail using edison branch and noticed an issues with the > serial console. > > The cedartrail.conf in the machine directory has the following statements: > > SYSLINUX_OPTS = "

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread Bodke, Kishore K
>-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of jfabernathy >Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:12 AM >To: yocto@yoctoproject.org >Subject: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console > >Using a DN2800MT (Marshalltown) Intel board,

Re: [yocto] Bugzilla Re-organization

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback > now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently > disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and see > if you spot any errors. Addition

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread jfabernathy
On 05/31/2012 02:18 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of jfabernathy Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:12 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console Us

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread jfabernathy
On 05/31/2012 02:13 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/31/2012 09:11 AM, jfabernathy wrote: Using a DN2800MT (Marshalltown) Intel board, I'm testing the meta-cedartrail using edison branch and noticed an issues with the serial console. The cedartrail.conf in the machine directory has the following s

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][linux-yocto-3.2] fri2 serial port fixes for preempt-rt

2012-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-05-31 02:04 PM, Darren Hart wrote: These patches address are lockup when attempting login over serial on the fri2 when running the preempt-rt kernel. I have sent the first patch out for review, but have not yet heard back. The serial port works and appears fairly stable. However, I would pr

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > Hi all, > > As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make > a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a > 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. > N

Re: [yocto] Hob implementation: vanilla or branded?

2012-05-31 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Belen, On 31 May 2012 17:55, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > As part of the Hob work for the 1.3 release it looks like we need to make > a visual design and implementation decision: do we want a 'vanilla' or a > 'branded' look for Hob? Sorry if the choice of words is not the best. > Neither 'vanil

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread jfabernathy
On 05/31/2012 02:18 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of jfabernathy Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:12 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console Us

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/31/2012 11:54 AM, jfabernathy wrote: > On 05/31/2012 02:13 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> On 05/31/2012 09:11 AM, jfabernathy wrote: >>> Using a DN2800MT (Marshalltown) Intel board, I'm testing the >>> meta-cedartrail using edison branch and noticed an issues with the >>> serial console. >>>

Re: [yocto] meta-cedartrail - serial console

2012-05-31 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/31/2012 12:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote: > On 05/31/2012 02:18 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of jfabernathy >>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:12 AM >>> To: yocto@yoctop

[yocto] Hello

2012-05-31 Thread Jim Rucker
I'm fairly new to Yocto and Poky and I have a question that I haven't been able to find through Google. If there are multiple .bb files in a directory, how does bitbake choose which one to use? Background: I'm inheriting a project from someone and they have a SRC_URI="git" version and a SRC

Re: [yocto] Hello

2012-05-31 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jim Rucker wrote: > I'm fairly new to Yocto and Poky and I have a question that I haven't been > able to find through Google. If there are multiple .bb files in a directory, > how does bitbake choose which one to use? read http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.0/po

Re: [yocto] Bugzilla Re-organization

2012-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and s