Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Seebach
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:21:26 +0800 "Xu, Dongxiao" wrote: > What do you mean by first build? Did you click "Just bake" button? Yes. The original reproducer I saw said that it worked the first time, but failed the second time. > 1) build_target(packages) > 2) build_target(image) > I noticed th

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 23 March 2012 02:16:35 Peter Seebach wrote: > Still really weird to me that I can't reproduce this outside of hob. > I am pretty sure there exists a series of forks and execs and > environment changes such that this will end up happening. I now have a fairly simple test case outside of h

[yocto] [PATCH] ia32-base.inc: Use '=' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

2012-03-23 Thread Tom Rini
As per http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/019772.html a machine conf file should use '=' to set IMAGE_FSTYPES. Cc: Kishore Bodke Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: Darren Hart Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertio

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Seebach
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:20:08 + Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2012 02:16:35 Peter Seebach wrote: > > Still really weird to me that I can't reproduce this outside of hob. > > I am pretty sure there exists a series of forks and execs and > > environment changes such that this will en

[yocto] first pass at cleaning up ref manual: dead(?) variables in glossary

2012-03-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
as part of a concerted effort to tidy up more of the docs, i'm currently perusing the variable glossary in the yocto/poky ref manual: file:///home/rpjday/yocto/yocto-docs/documentation/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html#ref-variables-glos and cross-checking entries against their actual usage

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [meta-intel] meta-romley switching kernel to 3.2

2012-03-23 Thread kishore . k . bodke
From: Kishore Bodke These patch set is to switch the kernel version to 3.2 for romley bsp. Please pull into meta-intel/master. Thanks Kishore. The following changes since commit f89405e115d73426c8a6450b6e795b5885d6bdf3: MAINTAINERS: Add FRI2 maintainer (2012-03-23 09:46:15 -0700) are avail

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] [meta-intel] meta-romley: switch to linux-yocto-3.2 kernel

2012-03-23 Thread kishore . k . bodke
From: Kishore Bodke Switch romley to the 3.2 kernel and update kernel SRCREVs. Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke --- meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf |3 +++ .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.2.bbappend |8 .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [linux-yocto-3.2][meta] common-pc: Add PCNET32 to the config

2012-03-23 Thread Darren Hart
In support of the self-hosted-image, add CONFIG_PCNET32 to the common-pc BSP default cfg. This enables the qemux86 image to be run on both qemux86 machines as well as the vmware 32b machine. Since the qemux86 machine optionally supports pcnet, this seems a reasonable compromise to managing a dedica

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] [meta] common-pc: Add PCNET32 to the config

2012-03-23 Thread Darren Hart
Qemu and VM Ware both support PCNET32 and the latter requires it for 32 bit images. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/common-pc.cfg |3 +++ meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/hardware.cfg |1 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --gi

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-23 Thread Peter Seebach
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:20:08 + Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2012 02:16:35 Peter Seebach wrote: > > Still really weird to me that I can't reproduce this outside of hob. > > I am pretty sure there exists a series of forks and execs and > > environment changes such that this will en

Re: [yocto] poky ref manual still confuses BB_ENV_WHITELIST and BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE

2012-03-23 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Okay - I dug into this a bit with the help of Scott Garman. He uncovered a bit in the BitBake changelog. It states the following: By default it will now only pass certain whitelisted variables into the data store. If BB_PRESERVE_ENV is set bitbake will use all variable from the enviro

Re: [yocto] yocto docs: confusion between shell env vars and bitbake env vars

2012-03-23 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
I clarified about 5 instances of this problem in the reference manual. As usual, see http://www.yoctoprojects.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html for the latest. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On